岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 1364-1372.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0305CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0305

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

裂隙岩层中的地铁车站基底孔压实测与分析

宋林辉1,张静轩1,郭易龙1,杨天娇1,李志明2,梅国雄3   

  1. 1.南京工业大学 数理科学学院,江苏 南京 211800;2.徐州地铁集团有限公司,江苏 徐州 221000; 3.浙江大学 海洋学院,浙江 杭州 310058
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-26 接受日期:2025-07-25 出版日期:2026-04-13 发布日期:2026-04-16
  • 作者简介:宋林辉,男,1980年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土力学方面的研究工作。E-mail: h27991@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.12402482);江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划(No.KYCX25-1714)。

Measurement and analysis of pore pressure at the base of subway stations in fractured rock layers

SONG Lin-hui1, ZHANG Jing-xuan1, GUO Yi-long1, YANG Tian-jiao1, LI Zhi-ming2, MEI Guo-xiong3   

  1. 1. School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211800, China; 2. Xuzhou Metro Group Co., Ltd., Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221000, China; 3. Ocean College, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
  • Received:2025-03-26 Accepted:2025-07-25 Online:2026-04-13 Published:2026-04-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12402482) and the Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX25-1714).

摘要: 以城市轨道交通为主导的大规模地下空间开发带来的岩土问题日益突出,地铁车站结构抗浮便是关键问题之一。现依托地铁车站项目制定监测方案,在场地周边设置水位监测点和气象监测点、在车站基底设置孔压计,进行为期两年的实时监测,得到了从车站施工到运营全过程的基底孔压、现场水位和降雨量数据,并对孔压变化规律及其影响因素展开分析。测试与分析结果表明,基底各点孔压动态变化,对降水和降雨响应及时,降水施工可有效消减基底孔压,部分区域停止降水后孔压会增长,最大增长值为76.8 kPa、最大增长率为213%,孔压增长值和增长率与停止降水区域的降深、到监测区的距离和停排水量密切相关,且距离的影响最大、停排水量次之;降雨会增大基底孔压大小,中雨以上降雨量引起的孔压增量大于0.04 kPa/mm,且降雨后水位和基底孔压增长会滞后4~5 h;运营期间的孔压比平均值在0.84~0.96之间变化,丰水期较大,孔压测试值与静水压值基本相等,抗浮设计有必要设置1.05的安全系数。研究成果可为地铁车站施工和抗浮设计提供参考。

关键词: 裂隙岩地基, 地铁车站, 孔压测试, 降水, 降雨, 孔压比

Abstract: The geotechnical issues arising from the large-scale development of underground spaces, primarily driven by urban rail transit, are becoming increasingly prominent. One of the key issues is the anti-floating performance of subway station structures. Based on the subway station project, a monitoring plan has been developed. Water-level and meteorological monitoring points were established around the site. Pore-pressure sensors were installed at the base of the station to enable real-time monitoring for two years. Pore-pressure, on-site water level, and rainfall data have been collected for the entire period from construction to operation. Moreover, the variations in pore pressure and their influencing factors were analyzed. The test and analysis results indicate that the pore pressure at each point of the base dynamically changes and responds promptly to dewatering and rainfall. Dewatering can effectively reduce the pore pressure of the foundation. The pore pressure will increase after stopping dewatering in local area, with a maximum growth value of 76.8 kPa and a maximum growth rate of 213%. The growth value and growth rate of pore pressure are closely related to the depth, distance to the monitoring area, and amount of water in the area where dewatering is stopped, and the distance has the greatest impact, followed by the amount of water to be stopped. Rainfall will increase the pore pressure, and the increase in pore pressure caused by moderate to heavy rainfall is greater than 0.04 kPa/mm. Moreover, the increase in water level and pore pressure after rainfall will lag behind by 4 to 5 hours. The average pore pressure ratio during subway operation varies between 0.84 and 0.96, with higher values during the wet season. The pore pressure test values are basically equal to the static water pressure values. It is necessary to set a safety factor of 1.05 in anti-floating design. The research results can provide reference for subway station construction and anti-floating design.

Key words: fractured rock foundation, subway station, pore pressure measurement, dewatering, rainfall, pore pressure ratio

中图分类号: TU 46
[1] 王家辉, 江洎洧, 孙逸飞, 王培清, 王保田, 陈亮, 周钺, 李超. 泥浆介质饱和下松散堆积体抗剪强度特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1313-1322.
[2] 蒋水华, 葛成民, 元志镕, 向晖, 胡伟, 黄发明. 基于等效渗透系数的多层土坡降雨入渗模型及可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1417-1430.
[3] 杨俊鹏, 段晓沛, 张倩, 李博文, 汪益敏. 降雨条件下加筋改良软岩残积土排水性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 882-892.
[4] 张西文, 江晓童, 吕颖慧, 邱 宇, 刘福震. 倾斜液化场地地铁车站地震响应和损伤特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 1022-1030.
[5] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[6] 高品红, 高晨博, 彭成威, 刘飞禹, . 降雨作用下花岗岩残积土边坡模型试验及离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1632-1642.
[7] 宋享桦, 肖衡林, 倪化勇, 谭勇, . 降雨作用下砂土边坡失稳破坏触发机制宏细观研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 969-979.
[8] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
[9] 丁军领, 吉锋, 魏松, 张波, 曾瑞, 李卓, 陆宇鹏. 降雨及库水位作用下碎石土岸坡变形破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3740-3756.
[10] 慕焕东, 邓亚虹, 赵勋昌, 何乃楠, 郑龙浩, 何也, . 基于非饱和剪切体变特征的马兰黄土液化评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3197-3207.
[11] 杨昊天, 吴红刚, 韦洪, 赖国泉, 尹威江, . 降雨条件下三级桥基岸坡−BFRP锚杆体系的协同变形机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 267-276.
[12] 林滨强, 章德生, 简文彬, 豆红强, 王浩, 樊秀峰, . 风驱雨作用下植被斜坡稳定性响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2765-2774.
[13] 谌文武, 王科玉, 祁强, 张少冉, 王立, . 降水与蒸发交替作用下西北土遗址盐分迁移与赋存规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2209-2220.
[14] 薛秀丽, 刘治珩, 曾超峰, 白 宁, 陈宏波. 开挖前抽水条件下基坑围挡两侧非极限土压力计算模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1699-1708.
[15] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 陈虹羽, 郭玉丰, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 基于变形的降雨后地震基覆型边坡劣化特性与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1789-1802.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!