岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 1194-1206.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0349CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0349

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

岩体粗糙裂隙注浆可视化试验及扩散机制研究

刘先珊1, 2,熊振瑀1, 2,杨志兵3,周小平1, 2,谢强1, 2, 杨文远1, 2,宋昱霖1, 2,刘洋1, 2   

  1. 1.重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400045;2.山区土木工程安全与韧性全国重点实验室,重庆 400045; 3.武汉大学 水资源工程与调度全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 400072
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-07 接受日期:2025-09-26 出版日期:2026-04-13 发布日期:2026-04-15
  • 作者简介:刘先珊,女,1978年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程渗流、多场耦合理论及数值方法等教学研究工作。 E-mail: liuxianshan@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52579098,No.52279094,No.52478328)。

Visualized experiments on grouting in rough fractures and corresponding diffusion mechanism of the grout

LIU Xian-shan1, 2, XIONG Zhen-yu1, 2, YANG Zhi-bing3, ZHOU Xiao-ping1, 2, XIE Qiang1, 2, YANG Wen-yuan1, 2, SONG Yu-lin1, 2, LIU Yang1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Safety and Resilience of Civil Engineering in Mountain Area, Chongqing 400045, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 400072, China
  • Received:2025-04-07 Accepted:2025-09-26 Online:2026-04-13 Published:2026-04-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52579098, 52279094, 52478328).

摘要: 注浆充填法作为采空区岩体裂隙治理的重要手段,现场仍难以准确获得浆液扩散规律,注浆过程难以控制,优化其技术以提高注浆效率并提升其效果是关键。以山西晋城市某下伏采空区的实勘岩体裂隙为研究对象,构建了粗糙度可控的裂隙模型,3D打印了环氧树脂透明粗糙裂隙,自主搭建了粗糙裂隙注浆可视化试验平台,分析不同浆液浓度、裂隙粗糙度、注浆压力与速率的浆液扩散特征、扩散范围及扩散速率,揭示了浆液浓度、裂隙粗糙度与注浆输入条件协同的浆液扩散机制;并应用相界面理论表征浆液扩散形式,基于分形维数描述不同因素影响的浆液扩散形式,探讨了浆液实际填充率与填充能力的关联性,提出了实际充填率作为粗糙裂隙内浆液填充能力的评价指标。研究结果表明:浆液扩散形式受注浆压力、裂隙粗糙度、浆液流变性能等显著影响,阐明其主控因素为注浆速率与注浆压力,但仍受浆液流变性能与裂隙形貌的调控;浆液扩散速度越快,其扩散轮廓越不规则,不利于完全填充复杂的裂隙网络;实际填充率的效果评价表明,高浓度浆液与高注浆压力的组合可有效填充裂隙。进一步建立了岩体裂隙注浆数值模型,验证了试验结果的可靠性。其研究成果可为岩体裂隙注浆中的浆液配置、注浆孔间距、注浆压力等优化提供科学依据,突破了传统注浆法的参数选择难题。

关键词: 可视化试验, 注浆, 粗糙裂隙, 浆液扩散, 填充率

Abstract: Grouting is a crucial technique for treating rock fractures in goafs, but it still faces challenges in predicting diffusion patterns and controlling the process; thus, optimization is needed to improve efficiency and effectiveness. As a case study, actual rock fractures in a grouting project for an underlying goaf in Jincheng City, Shanxi Province were used. A fracture model with controllable roughness was constructed, and transparent epoxy resin rough fractures were fabricated by 3D printing. And then, a self-developed visual experimental platform for rough fractures was established to analyze the diffusion characteristics, range, and grouting rate considering different grout concentrations, fracture roughness, grouting pressures and grouting rates, revealing the grouting diffusion mechanism with combination of grout concentration, fracture roughness, and grouting input conditions. And also, the phase interface theory was applied to characterize the diffusion pattern, and the fractal dimension was proposed to describe corresponding diffusion pattern under different conditions. The correlation between actual filling rate and filling capacity was explored, with “actual filling ratio” used as an index for grout filling capacity in rough fractures. These investigations show that grouting diffusion exhibits different patterns depending on grouting pressure, fracture roughness, and grout rheology, with grouting rate and grouting pressure as primary controlling factors and diffusion regulated by rheology and fracture morphology. Furthermore, faster grout diffusion leads to more irregular diffusion contours, which hinders complete filling of complex fracture networks, so the actual filling ratio can explain effective grouting in the fractures considering the combination of high-concentration grout and high grouting pressure. Additionally, a proposed numerical model for rock fracture grouting was established, verifying the reliability of the experimental results. The above achievements provide scientific supports for optimizing grout mixture design, grout hole spacing, and grouting pressure, solving corresponding parameter selection in traditional grouting methods for rock fractures grouting.

Key words: visualized experiment, grouting, rough fractures, grout diffusion, actual filling rate

中图分类号: TU 457
[1] 万志辉, 郭子龙, 段畅, 戴国亮, 龚维明. 分布式后压浆工艺对深长大直径灌注桩承载性能影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1373-1385.
[2] 谢云鹏, 杨磊, 许振浩, 盛祥超, 马晨阳, 王蓥森, 宓祥云. 致密软弱地层重复劈裂注浆扩散特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1273-1287.
[3] 郑福, 姜谙男, 张浩扬. 高温作用下注浆结构面剪切特性及强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 893-911.
[4] 贾宝新, 袁庆雷. 注浆影响下隧道渗流场及最小覆土厚度修正研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 255-266.
[5] 李博, 唐敏, 刘蓉蓉, 谢雨施, 邹良超, 石振明. 岩石正交裂隙内浆液驱替动水机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 337-348.
[6] 冉龙洲, 袁松, 王希宝, 张廷彪, 刘德军, 黎良仆, . 考虑围岩−盾体−注浆体−管片相互作用的深埋护盾式隧道掘进机法隧道围岩压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 366-376.
[7] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[8] 高帅, 任富强, 常远. 预制单裂隙砂岩注浆过程中的浆液流动特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2505-2515.
[9] 祁凯, 万志辉, 戴国亮, 胡涛, 周峰, 张鹏, . 基于不同注浆材料固化钙质砂的力学性能试验及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1825-1838.
[10] 都海龙, 金爱兵, 秦文静, 商瑞豪, 王传江, 马赛, . 单轴压缩下水泥注浆煤岩力学性能及损伤特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1521-1533.
[11] 乔龙全, 常聚才, 严良欢, 齐潮, 史文豹, . 类软岩真三轴劈裂注浆裂隙扩展特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 833-850.
[12] 李博, 刘蓉蓉, 邹良超, . 单裂隙内浆液基本流动规律的理论、试验、模拟对比分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 751-760.
[13] 黄大维, 刘家璇, 谭满生, 邓翔浩, 黄永亮, 翁友华, 陈升平, . 盾构隧道底部注浆抬升模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 371-381.
[14] 周禹良, 侯公羽, 李生生, 贺文, 杨雪, 赵庆儒, 黄佳铭, . 裂隙型类岩竖井注浆帷幕试样开挖卸荷响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 391-404.
[15] 李晓龙, 赵泽鑫, 陈坤洋, 马鹏, 陈灿, 钟燕辉, 张蓓, . 考虑化学反应的高聚物压密劈裂注浆仿真研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2823-2838.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!