岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 1110-1128.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0887CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0887

• 测试技术 • 上一篇    

月壤原位力学特性探测发展与关键技术展望

韩宗芳1, 2,李玉琼1, 2,李娜1, 2,袁征1, 2,应黎坪1, 2,吴文旭1, 2,褚福临1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院力学研究所 流固耦合系统力学重点实验室,北京 100190; 2. 中国科学院力学研究所 超常环境非线性力学全国重点实验室,北京 100190
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-16 接受日期:2025-12-10 出版日期:2026-03-17 发布日期:2026-03-24
  • 通讯作者: 李玉琼,男,1982年生,博士,研究员,主要从事星壤力学测试与模型构建、机器与地面系统力学、特种车辆全域越野机动等研究。E-mail: liyuqiong@imech.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:韩宗芳,女,1988年生,博士,助理研究员,主要从事月壤原位力学探测、贯入阻力机制研究、多尺度力学数值仿真与理论分析。E-mail: hanzongfang@imech.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学院青年创新促进会优秀会员(No.Y2022009);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(B类)(No.XDB0620103)。

Research progress and technological prospects for in-situ mechanical characterization of lunar soil

HAN Zong-fang1, 2, LI Yu-qiong1, 2, LI Na1, 2, YUAN Zheng1, 2, YING Li-ping1, 2, WU Wen-xu1, 2, CHU Fu-lin1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory for Mechanics in Fluid Solid Coupling Systems, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Nonlinear Mechanics, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • Received:2025-08-16 Accepted:2025-12-10 Online:2026-03-17 Published:2026-03-24
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y2022009) and the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB0620103).

摘要: 获取月壤的原位力学是人类在月面开展科研和建设的先决条件。系统梳理了不同原位探测方法的原理、功能和优缺点,并总结了苏联月球号和美国阿波罗号在月壤原位力学探测方面已取得的研究成果、存在的问题以及目前相关技术的发展趋势。聚焦我国月壤原位力学探测技术的研究现状,重点阐述了相关研究单位基于静力触探方法在月壤、星壤原位力学探测方面所开展的预研工作。由于月壤独特的物理性质、极端月球环境以及有限资源的限制,要实现月壤原位力学以及3 m以上更深的精准探测和解译,其关键技术尚待进一步创新和突破。依据我国探月工程的发展需求,提出了月壤原位力学探测亟需重点攻关的技术难点和发展方向。未来的月壤原位力学探测载荷将朝着小型化、自动化、智能化的方向发展,形成作业模式新颖的新原理和新方法,同时在结构设计上进行创新,并嵌入机器学习的技术,AI赋能建立适合月壤的力学参数精准解译方法,从而为我国月壤原位力学探测任务的顺利实施以及实现更准、更深的探测目标提供参考和技术支撑。

关键词: 月壤, 力学参数, 静力触探, 原位力学探测

Abstract: Obtaining in-situ mechanical properties of lunar soil is a prerequisite for human scientific research and construction on the lunar surface. This paper systematically reviews the principles, functions, advantages and disadvantages of various in-situ detection methods, and summarizes the research achievements, existing problems and current development trends of related technologies in in-situ mechanical characterization technology employed in the Soviet Union’s Luna and the United States’ Apollo missions. Focusing on the research status of in-situ mechanical characterization technology for lunar soil in China, it elaborates on the preparatory research work carried out by relevant research institutions in the in-situ mechanical detection of lunar soil and extraterrestrial soil based on static cone penetration method. Due to the unique physical properties of lunar soil, extreme lunar environments, and constraints imposed by limited resources, achieving in-situ mechanical detection of lunar soil and precise exploration and interpretation at depths exceeding 3 m still requires further technological innovation and breakthroughs. In accordance with the development needs of China’s lunar exploration program, this paper identifies the critical technical challenges and key development directions that require urgent attention for in-situ mechanical detection of lunar soil. The future in-situ mechanical detection payloads for lunar soil will develop towards miniaturization, automation and intelligence, forming novel operation modes based on new principles and methods. At the same time, innovations will be made in structural design and machine learning technology will be integrated. AI will be empowered to establish precise interpretation methods for mechanical parameters suitable for lunar soil, thereby providing reference and technical support for the successful execution of China’s in-situ lunar soil mechanical exploration missions and achieving more accurate and deeper exploration objectives.

Key words: lunar soil, mechanical parameters, static cone penetration, in-situ mechanical detection

中图分类号: TU443
[1] 张波波, 马芹永, . 氧化石墨烯和纳米二氧化硅增强模拟月壤地聚合物的制备及性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 607-626.
[2] 蔡玉娟, 蔡静森, 任少文, 刘锴, 陈劲, 李漪, . 岩溶区非均质岩组岩体力学参数快速估计方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2749-2762.
[3] 赖丰文, 刘松玉, 蔡国军, 鲁泰山, 李洪江, 段伟, . 基于孔压静力触探原位测试的基坑围护结构变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2650-2660.
[4] 陈志波, 陈峰, 翁洋, 曹光伟, 曾旭明, 潘生贵, 杨辉, . 考虑土塞效应的大直径钢管桩竖向承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2224-2236.
[5] 吴盾, 孙林, 陆建伟, 于秉坤, 蔡国军, . 火壤工程地质原位探测技术研究进展与孔压静力触探应用展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2308-2324.
[6] 张世殊, 李青春, 刘松玉, 崔德山, 李洪江, 黎伟, 陈盼. 深厚覆盖层孔内原位测试技术现状与展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 4009-4028.
[7] 代仲海, 李裕成, 莫品强, 位鑫宇, 蔡国军. 基于静力触探数据的滨海黏土应力历史与强度特性解译研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3913-3923.
[8] 童森杰, 黄茂松, 时振昊, 王滨. 砂土全应变范围非线性特性对贯入大变形问题的影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3707-3714.
[9] 莫云, 胡新丽, 崔德山, 顾东明, 谢昭宇, 杨勇, . 砂化白云岩Hoek-Brown准则参数取值方法研究及其岩体力学参数估算[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 257-265.
[10] 王新龙, 聂利青, 蔡国军, 张宁, 赵泽宁, 刘薛宁, 宋登辉, . 基于孔压静力触探技术的SVR优化算法评估土体液性指数[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 645-653.
[11] 王宽君, 刘彬, 莫品强, 李国耀, 朱启银, 沈侃敏, 胡静, . 考虑粉土温度效应与排水状态的CPTu计算模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1731-1742.
[12] 张思宇, 李兆焱, 袁晓铭, . 国内外静力触探液化判别方法对比检验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1517-1526.
[13] 芮瑞, 田子衿, 杨海青, 黄腾, 蒙庆辉, 王金元, . 温度效应影响下的海相软土静力学特性试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1112-1120.
[14] 孙淼军, 谢雅囡, 王栋, . 结构性土中静力触探孔压消散的大变形模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3416-3422.
[15] 李林, 左林龙, 胡涛涛, 宋博恺, . 基于孔压静力触探试验测试数据的原位固结系数物理信息神经网络反演方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2889-2899.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!