岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8): 2653-2664.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0986CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0986

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

真空预压-辐射式电渗方法处理污染淤泥脱水与重金属Cu剔除机制研究

冯双喜1, 2, 3,卜天浩1,雷华阳1, 2, 3, 4,邢道润1,张国庆1,李建楷1   

  1. 1. 天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300350;2. 天津大学 滨海土木工程结构与安全教育部重点实验室,天津 300350; 3. 中国地震局地震工程综合模拟与城乡抗震韧性重点实验室,天津 300350;4. 广西大学 土木建筑工程学院,广西 南宁 530004
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-15 接受日期:2025-12-22 出版日期:2026-08-11 发布日期:2026-08-17
  • 通讯作者: 雷华阳,女,1974年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail:leihuayang74@163.com
  • 作者简介:冯双喜,男,1988年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail:shuangxi@tju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52108336);天津市自然科学基金(No. 22JCQNJC00130)。

Dehydration of contaminated silt and mechanism of heavy metal Cu removal by vacuum preloading-radiation electroosmosis method

FENG Shuang-xi1, 2, 3, BU Tian-hao1, LEI Hua-yang1, 2, 3 ,4, XING Dao-run1, ZHANG Guo-qing1, LI Jian-kai1   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering Simulation and Seismic Resilience of China Earthquake Administration, Tianjin 300350, China; 4. Department of Civil Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China
  • Received:2025-09-15 Accepted:2025-12-22 Online:2026-08-11 Published:2026-08-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52108336) and the Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (22JCQNJC00130).

摘要: 针对传统真空预压处理污染淤泥存在脱水效果差、重金属剔除不达标等问题,提出兼具脱水和重金属剔除功能的真空预压-辐射式电渗技术。通过对辐射式电极加固机制与重金属离子剔除机制的理论推导,发现与传统竖向电极相比,辐射式电极通过叠加横向电场增强总电场强度、扩展有效作用面积两个机制,显著提升单位时间排水量,缩短固结时间,其固结排水效果优于传统竖向电极,并且传统竖向电极电渗法重金属离子迁移时间大于辐射式电极电渗重金属离子迁移时间,证明了相同位置的重金属离子,受到辐射式电极电场强度更强,离子迁移速度更快。为验证真空预压-辐射式电渗技术处理污染淤泥脱水与重金属剔除效果,设计6组室内模型试验,即常规真空预压、真空预压-电渗、真空预压-阴阳极辐射式电渗、真空预压-持续通电电渗、真空预压-间歇通电电渗、真空预压-逐级通电电渗,分析排水量、沉降量、十字板剪切强度、含水率、固结度及Cu²⁺含量等指标。结果显示:逐级通电脱水效果最优,与传统真空预压相比,排水量增加38.19%,沉降量提高26.63%,十字板剪切强度提升39.51%~73.4%,含水率降低3.41%~5.36%;重金属剔除效果持续通电最佳(Cu²⁺剔除量为224.04 mg/kg),逐级通电略低(Cu²⁺剔除量为220.1 mg/kg),为真空预压法技术的改良提供了理论依据。

关键词: 真空预压, 辐射式电极, 室内模型试验, 重金属剔除, 污染淤泥

Abstract: To tackle the problems of poor dehydration effect and unqualified removal of heavy metals in the traditional vacuum preloading for contaminated sludge treatment, we propose a vacuum preloading-radiation electroosmosis technology that integrates both dehydration and heavy metal removal capabilities. Through the theoretical derivation of the reinforcement mechanism of the radiation electrode and the removal mechanism of heavy metal ions, we discovered that, compared with the traditional vertical electrode, the radiation electrode substantially improves the drainage volume per unit time and shortens the consolidation time via two mechanisms: superimposing the transverse electric field to augment the overall electric field intensity, expanding the effective action area. Its consolidation and drainage performance surpasses that of the traditional vertical electrode. Moreover, the migration duration of heavy metal ions is longer in electroosmosis with traditional vertical electrodes than with radiation electrodes, proving that heavy metal ions at the identical position are subjected to a more intense electric field from the radiation electrode, leading to accelerated ion migration. To assess the dehydration and heavy metal removal efficacy of the vacuum preloading-radiation electroosmosis technology in treating contaminated silt, we conducted six sets of laboratory model tests, encompassing traditional vacuum preloading (VP), vacuum preloading + electro-osmosis (VP+EO), vacuum preloading + electro-osmosis with cathode-anode radiant electrode (VP+EOCAR), vacuum preloading + electro-osmosis with sustained power (VP+EOSP), vacuum preloading + electro-osmosis with intermittent power (VP+EOIP), and vacuum preloading + electro-osmosis with graded power (VP+EOGP). We analyzed indicators such as drainage volume, settlement, vane shear strength, water content, degree of consolidation, and Cu2+ content. The findings reveal that VP+EOGP yields the optimal dehydration results, with a 38.19% increase in drainage volume, a 26.63% rise in settlement, a 39.51% to 73.4% enhancement in vane shear strength, and a 3.41% to 5.36% reduction in water content compared to VP. For heavy metal removal, VP+EOSP performs best (with a Cu²⁺ removal of 224.04 mg/kg), followed by gradual power-on VP+EOGP (with a Cu²⁺ removal of 220.1 mg/kg). This finding offer a theoretical foundation for the improvement of vacuum preloading technology.

Key words: vacuum preloading, radiant electrode, laboratory model test, heavy metal removal, contaminated silt

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] SUTANTO Daniel, LIM Aswin, SUKIWAN Octavianus Arvin, WIJAYA Martin. 真空预压过程中与预压后的软土蠕变特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1632-1644.
[2] 周游, 郭伟, 任宇晓, 闫澍旺, 郎瑞卿. 套筒辅助水下真空预压法模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1262-1272.
[3] 张京, 宗梦繁, 吴文兵, 张驿, 梅国雄. 自由应变下多级堆载预压联合电渗-真空排水径向固结特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1340-1350.
[4] 周亚东, 吴松林, 邢蓓琪, 李玉龙. 真空预压-加热联合作用下竖井地基大变形固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 571-580.
[5] 贾宝新, 袁庆雷. 注浆影响下隧道渗流场及最小覆土厚度修正研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 255-266.
[6] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[7] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[8] 杨少朋, 杨爱武, 许福军, . 改性纤维排水板真空预压加固吹填软土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 789-797.
[9] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[10] 孙宏磊, 徐振恺, 刘斯杰, 蔡袁强, . 考虑土柱发展过程的淤泥真空预压大应变固结计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 133-146.
[11] 崔允亮, 潘方然, 高楥园, 金子原, . 真空预压淤堵区渗透系数的计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2085-2093.
[12] 刘景锦, 罗学思, 雷华阳, 郑刚, 罗昊鹏, . 等应变条件下增压式真空预压固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 809-821.
[13] 季雨坤, 王钦科, 赵国良, 张健, 马建林, . 斜坡上嵌岩抗拔桩竖向承载变形特性模型试验及数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1604-1614.
[14] 周翔, 蔡静森, 马伟成, 肖皓文, . 物质组成特征对碎石土斜坡变形破坏影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 531-540.
[15] 胡利文, 洪义, 王德咏, . 水下双面真空预压离心模型试验及数值模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 3059-3070.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!