岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10): 3389-3398.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.1105CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.1105

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

碱激发剂种类对磷石膏-矿渣胶凝材料固化粉质黏土性能的影响

王冲1, 2,刘金保1, 2,谈云志1, 2,田苗苗1, 2,骆江涛3   

  1. 1.三峡大学 特殊土资源化利用宜昌市重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002;2.三峡大学 防灾减灾湖北省重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002; 3.华工丘力(湖北)新材料科技有限公司,湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-16 接受日期:2025-11-19 出版日期:2026-10-10 发布日期:2026-10-08
  • 通讯作者: 谈云志,男,1979年生,博士,教授,主要从事特殊土土力学方面的研究。E-mail: yztan@ctgu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王冲,男,1993年生,博士,讲师,主要从事特殊土土力学方面的研究。E-mail: chongwang@ctgu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. U24A20183);湖北省自然科学基金(No. 2026AFC0420)。

Effects of alkali-activator types on the properties of silty clay solidified with phosphogypsum-slag cementitious materials

WANG Chong1, 2, LIU Jin-bao1, 2, TAN Yun-zhi1, 2, TIAN Miao-miao1, 2, LUO Jiang-tao3   

  1. 1. Yichang Key Laboratory of Special Soil Resource Utilization, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 3. Huagong Qiu Li (Hubei) New Material Technology Co., Ltd., Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
  • Received:2025-10-16 Accepted:2025-11-19 Online:2026-10-10 Published:2026-10-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U24A20183) and the Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2026AFC0420).

摘要: 碱激发剂对磷石膏基胶凝材料(phosphogypsum-based cementitious materials,简称PPSC)的强度发展至关重要,然而其在固化土中的作用因土体干扰尚不明确。通过无侧限抗压强度(unconfined compressive strength,简称UCS)、pH值、压汞孔隙分析(mercury intrusion porosimetry,简称MIP)和扫描电镜(scanning electron microscope,简称SEM)等试验,分析激发剂种类(水泥、生石灰、NaOH、NaOH+水玻璃)及PPSC掺量对固化土力学性能与微观结构的影响规律,揭示碱性环境对PPSC固化土性能的调控机制。结果表明:激发剂提供的碱性环境对固化土的早期强度影响显著。其中,水泥激发剂提供的碱性环境最弱,水化早期无法有效激发固化土中PPSC的反应活性,导致水泥激发剂组早期(7 d)UCS最低(0.46 MPa),远低于生石灰组(1.11 MPa)、水玻璃+NaOH组(0.84 MPa)与NaOH组(0.98 MPa)。但随着水泥激发剂的持续水化,固化土的碱性环境增强,其对固化土后期强度的影响有所减弱,养护28 d后固化土的强度依次为水泥组(1.61 MPa)<生石灰组(1.74 MPa)<水玻璃+NaOH组(1.95 MPa)<NaOH组(2.08 MPa)。固化土中的碱性环境存在pH阈值,当pH<10.08时,固化土中的PPSC无法充分水化,固化土强度受PPSC掺量影响不大;当pH≥10.08时,固化土强度随PPSC掺量的增加显著增长。本研究对磷石膏的高效资源化利用及土壤固化具有重要意义。

关键词: 磷石膏, 矿渣, 碱激发剂, 固化土, 力学性能, 微观结构

Abstract: The type of alkali activator is crucial for the strength development of phosphogypsum-based cementitious materials (PPSC), yet its role in soil solidification remains unclear due to the soil interference. Through unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests, pH measurements, mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), this study analyzed the effects of activator type (cement, quicklime, NaOH, NaOH+sodium silicate) and PPSC content on the mechanical properties and microstructure of solidified soil, revealing the regulatory mechanism of the alkaline environment on the performance of PPSC-solidified soil. The results indicate that the alkaline environment generated by the activator significantly influences the early-age strength development of the solidified soil. Notably, the alkaline environment induced by the cement activator exhibits the least potency, failing to effectively activate the reactivity of PPSC within the soil during the early hydration stage, resulting in the lowest early-age (7 d) UCS (0.46 MPa), which is substantially inferior to those observed in the quicklime-treated group (1.11 MPa), the NaOH+sodium silicate-treated group (0.84 MPa), and NaOH-treated group (0.98 MPa). However, with the continued hydration of the cement activator, the alkalinity in the solidified soil intensifies, thereby diminishing its impact on the later strength development. After 28 d of curing, the strength rankings of the solidified soil are as follows: cement-treated group (1.61 MPa)<quicklime-treated group (1.74 MPa)<NaOH+sodium silicate-treated group (1.95 MPa)<NaOH-treated group (2.08 MPa). Furthermore, the alkalinity of the solidified soil demonstrates a discernible pH threshold effect. When pH<10.08, the PPSC in the soil cannot fully hydrate, and the strength of the solidified soil is not significantly affected by the PPSC content. When pH≥10.08, the strength increases markedly with the increase of PPSC content. This study holds significant implications for the efficient resource utilization of phosphogypsum and soil solidification.

Key words: phosphogypsum, slag, alkaline activators, solidified soil, mechanical properties, microstructure

中图分类号: TU 442
[1] 吴俊, 周子翰, 姚传芹, 张丰收. 环境-组分耦合作用对月壤基地质聚合物的力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2549-2567.
[2] 谢明星, 贾良天, 孙涵, 崔岚, 解晓伟, 郑俊杰. 粒化高炉矿渣、粉煤灰及废旧轮胎纺织纤维协同固化膨胀土的力学性能与微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(8): 2617-2628.
[3] 谈云志, 王明威, 王冲, 明华军, 吴军, 陈阳. 盾构粉泥“粒化-压实-固化”联动处置方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2408-2419.
[4] 董武书, 雍睿, 杜时贵, 李泽, 张小艳, 宋佳敏. 动态CO2溶蚀作用下节理灰岩剪切力学性能及工程应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 2141-2156.
[5] 卢正, 则志辉, 赵阳, 柴少强, 刘斌, 李元彪, 姚海林. 基于开挖弃土与粉煤灰的泡沫轻质土物理力学性能及耐久性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 1917-1928.
[6] 夏敏, 李泓霖, 常朝凯, 黄琦. 冻融循环对泥炭土力学特性及微观结构演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 1929-1940.
[7] 邹高威, 王子帅, 王东星, 史宇豪. 碱性固废增强水泥流态固化有机质土效能与机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1645-1658.
[8] 马渊博, 董旭光, 胡倩倩, 黄德昭. 钙源对大豆脲酶固化黄土强度和水稳定性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 939-950.
[9] 田威, 贾祎恒, 云伟, 余宸, 程续. 脲酶诱导碳酸钙沉积对3D打印类砂岩试样力学性能与微观结构的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 767-779.
[10] 张波波, 马芹永, . 氧化石墨烯和纳米二氧化硅增强模拟月壤地聚合物的制备及性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 607-626.
[11] 张宏越, 金佳旭, 武鹏飞. 冻融循环作用下铁尾矿砂非均质堆积体力学性能劣化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 627-639.
[12] 赵康, 黄奇正, 石一辰, 马超, 冯印成, 田向勤, 刘浪. 不同粉煤灰掺量尾砂胶结充填体声发射与破坏预警特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 88-100.
[13] 姜海波, 刘建锋, 张军, 鲁功达, 谢良甫. 长距离输水渠道黄土湿陷性及微观结构特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 61-72.
[14] 郅彬, 魏园钧, 王番, 张茜, 刘存利, 任会明, . 冻融循环作用下含Na2SO4盐原状黄土宏观强度与微观结构关联机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 106-120.
[15] 张兴文, 曹净, 雷舒羽, 李育红, 程芸, 张柠锐, . 富里酸环境对含腐殖酸水泥土结构及渗透性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 249-261.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!