岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 3531-3539.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0232

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同冷却条件对高温砂岩物理力学性质的影响

金爱兵1, 2,王树亮1, 2,魏余栋1, 2,孙浩1, 2,韦立昌1, 2   

  1. 1. 北京科技大学 土木与资源工程学院,北京 100083;2. 北京科技大学 金属矿山高效开采与安全教育部重点实验室,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-05 修回日期:2020-04-13 出版日期:2020-11-11 发布日期:2020-12-24
  • 通讯作者: 孙浩,男,1992年生,博士,讲师,主要从事采矿工艺与理论、岩石力学方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail:sunhao2019@ustb.edu.cn E-mail:jinaibing@ustb.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:金爱兵,男,1974年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩石力学与工程方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51674015);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(No. FRF-TP-19-026A1)

Effect of different cooling conditions on physical and mechanical properties of high-temperature sandstone

JIN Ai-bing1, 2, WANG Shu-liang1, 2, WEI Yu-dong1, 2, SUN Hao1, 2, WEI Li-chang1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Resources Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mine, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2020-03-05 Revised:2020-04-13 Online:2020-11-11 Published:2020-12-24
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51674015) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(FRF-TP-19-026A1).

摘要: 岩石工程可能会经受高温环境。岩石高温后冷却方式的不同往往会导致岩石物理力学性质产生重大变化,这对岩石工程的稳定性、渗透性等都会产生重要影响。采用核磁共振(MRI)、电镜扫描(SEM)和单轴压缩试验对100、300、500、600、800 ℃ 5种不同温度砂岩经两种不同冷却方式(自然冷却和水中冷却)后的孔隙率、孔径分布、峰值强度、峰值应变、应力-应变关系以及微观结构变化等进行研究。试验结果表明:自然冷却时,高温砂岩强度并非随温度升高而持续降低,而水冷却会导致砂岩强度持续降低,且降低幅度远超自然冷却;500 ℃可以看作不同冷却方式对砂岩孔隙率影响的临界值,超过500 ℃,水冷却方式会导致孔隙率急剧增长,大孔径(Ф 10 μm)孔隙所占比例也高于自然冷却,因此,高温砂岩工程采用水冷却方式(如隧道着火后用水灭火)要充分考虑由此可能带来渗透危害;SEM测试表明,当温度 500 ℃时,水冷却对裂纹的增宽和扩展产生促进作用;当温度达到800 ℃时,水冷却砂岩孔洞变大,裂隙更加发育,并贯通连成网络,这会导致透水性大幅提高,同时,这也是该温度水冷却导致强度急剧降低的原因之一。

关键词: 砂岩, 热处理, 冷却条件, 孔隙, 核磁共振, 电镜扫描

Abstract: Rock engineering may be subjected to high temperature environment. Different cooling methods of high-temperature rock often lead to significant changes in the physical and mechanical properties of the rock, which will have an important impact on the stability and permeability of rock engineering. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), scanning electron microscope (SEM) and uniaxial compression test were used to study the porosity, pore size distribution, peak strength, peak strain, stress-strain relationship and microstructure changes of five temperatures for sandstone samples at 100, 300, 500, 600 and 800℃ under two cooling methods (natural cooling and water cooling). The test results show that: (1) When the rock samples used the natural cooling method, the strength of high-temperature sandstone does not decrease continuously with the increasing of temperature. However, rock samples using water cooling method show continuous decrease of sandstone strength, and the decreasing extent is far greater than that of natural cooling; (2) 500℃ can be considered as the critical value of the influence of different cooling methods on the porosity of sandstone. When the temperature is above 500℃, the water cooling method will cause the rock porosity increase rapidly, and the proportion of pores with large pore diameter (Ф>10 μm) is also higher than that of the natural cooling method. In this consideration, in the field of high-temperature sandstone engineering, the possible seepage hazards should be fully considered when water cooling is used (i.e., fire extinguishing with water after a tunnel is on fire); (3) The SEM test results shows that when the temperature is above 500℃, water cooling promotes the widening and expansion of cracks. When the temperature reaches to 800℃, the pore size of water-cooled sandstone becomes larger, and the fracture is largely developed and connects into a network. This will lead to a substantial increase in water permeability. At the same time, it is one of the reasons for the sharp decrease in rock strength that caused by water cooling at this temperature.

Key words: sandstone, heat treatment, cooling conditions, pore, MRI, SEM

中图分类号: TU 521
[1] 张胜, 柏巍, 徐鼎平, 郑虹, 江权, 李志伟, 向天兵, . 循环荷载作用下砂岩损伤演化的声发射与电阻率监测及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 53-66.
[2] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[3] 秦立科, 郭瑞琦, 赵皓辰, 甄刚, 王琦, . 环境蒸发条件下石质文物毛细水动态分布规律影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 354-365.
[4] 张春瑞, 纪洪广, 付桢, 张月征, 宋宇, 田竹华, 范文博, . 白云石对粉砂岩物理力学性质影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2661-2675.
[5] 刘先珊, 孙梦, 郑志伟, 熊振瑀, 于明智, 曹伊婷, 宋昱霖, 黄子宣, . 复杂孔隙介质两相驱替模式及驱替效率研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2363-2375.
[6] 雷瑞德, 顾清恒, 胡超, 贺培, 周林森, . 裂隙砂岩声发射信号特征及破裂前兆识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2023-2038.
[7] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[8] 吴婷, 杨志兵, 胡冉, 陈益峰, . 细颗粒运移与孔隙堵塞对两相渗流特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1755-1764.
[9] 倪祖甲, 乔江美, 张俊楷, 唐旭海, . 基于微观岩石力学试验及精确矿物晶体建模的砂岩力学性质及波速分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1865-1880.
[10] 陈一纬, 董平川, . 饱和各向异性裂缝型岩石中波的频散和衰减[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1934-1942.
[11] 吴青钱, 石露, 李小春, 白冰, . 水/超临界CO2对低黏土含量砂岩力学性质影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1442-1454.
[12] 杨柳, 吉明秀, 赵艳, 耿振坤, 李思源, 马雄德, 张谦, . 致密砂岩孔隙结构对两相驱替特征及CO2封存效率的影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1187-1195.
[13] 唐先习, 张徐军, 李昊杰, . 钢渣-煤矸石地聚合物固化黄土的力学特性评价与固化原理分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1205-1214.
[14] 宋勇军, 卢云龙, 王双龙, 谢丽君, 操警辉, 安旭晨, . 岩石冻融过程未冻水含量演化特征及对力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1049-1059.
[15] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!