岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 1123-1133.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0491

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

降雨入渗下非饱和坡残积土湿润锋运移试验研究

简文彬1, 2,黄聪惠1,罗阳华1,聂闻3   

  1. 1. 福州大学 岩土与地质工程系,福建 福州 350108;2. 福州大学 地质工程福建省高校工程研究中心,福建 福州 350108; 3. 中国科学院海西研究院泉州装备制造研究所,福建 泉州 362200
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-11 修回日期:2019-06-20 出版日期:2020-04-11 发布日期:2020-07-01
  • 作者简介:简文彬,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程与工程地质方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41861134011)

Experimental study on wetting front migration induced by rainfall infiltration in unsaturated eluvial and residual soil

JIAN Wen-bin1, 2, HUANG Cong-hui1, LUO Yang-hua1, NIE Wen3   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350108, China; 2. Engineering Research Center of Geological Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350108, China; 3. Quanzhou Institute of Equipment Manufacturing, Haixi Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Quanzhou, Fujian 362200, China
  • Received:2019-03-11 Revised:2019-06-20 Online:2020-04-11 Published:2020-07-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41861134011).

摘要: 我国东南沿海地区丘陵山地发育,降雨入渗到土体中的水分是导致滑坡灾害频发的关键因素。以福建省泉州市德化县地质灾害点为主要研究对象,考察典型地质灾害点具有代表性的坡积土与花岗岩残积土的渗透特性。利用自行研制的土体入渗装置,分别在降雨强度为15、30、60 mm/h条件下,考虑降雨历时一致(180 min)与过程降雨量一致(90 mm)两种工况开展一维土柱入渗试验,得到相应的各个土柱含水率、湿润锋、入渗率随时间变化的响应规律。试验结果表明:(1)土体渗透系数越大、雨强越大,土体湿润蔓延距离越深、速度越快。(2)降雨入渗过程中,土体含水率由浅及深逐次对降雨进行响应。不同雨强对含水率的影响主要体现在第一次响应时间以及饱和速度上,雨强越大,响应时间越快,饱和速度也越快。(3)提出可表征在不同雨强作用下,德化县马坪滑坡与崩土岭滑坡的湿润锋入渗公式。该研究成果对台风暴雨型滑坡的孕灾机制分析以及精细化监测预警具有重要的理论及实际意义。

关键词: 降雨, 坡残积土, 湿润锋, 响应时间, 滑坡

Abstract: Rain infiltration through the soil is the critical factor in the frequent landslides on the coast of China. By considering the geological disaster points of Dehua County, Quanzhou City, Fujian Province as the main research object, the permeability characteristics of slope soil and granite residual soil are concerned in these typical geological disaster points. The one-dimensional soil column infiltration test was carried out using the soil infiltration device developed by simulating rain intensities of 15, 30 and 60 mm/h, respectively, with the rainfall conditions of duration (180 min) and amount (90 mm). The response law of moisture content, wetting front and infiltration rate of each soil column with time under different working conditions was investigated. The main results are presented in detail. The soil wetness spreads deeper and faster as the permeability coefficient of soil and the rainfall intensity become greater. The soil moisture content responds to rainfall from shallow to deep part during the process of rainfall infiltration. Meanwhile, the influence of different rain intensities on water content is mainly reflected in the first response time and saturation time. The high intensity of rain leads to short response time and a quick saturation speed. A function is proposed for different rainfall intensities, which can characterise the wetting front infiltration laws of the Maping landslide and the Bengtuling landslide in Dehua County. The results are of great significance for the early warning of landslide hazards.

Key words: rainfall, slopewash and residual soil, wetting front, response time, landslide

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[2] 高品红, 高晨博, 彭成威, 刘飞禹, . 降雨作用下花岗岩残积土边坡模型试验及离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1632-1642.
[3] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[4] 宋享桦, 肖衡林, 倪化勇, 谭勇, . 降雨作用下砂土边坡失稳破坏触发机制宏细观研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 969-979.
[5] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
[6] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[7] 钱法桥, 邓亚虹, 慕焕东, 杨楠, 刘凡, 王梦晨, . 基于小波变换和拟动力法的边坡地震稳定性评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 88-96.
[8] 杨昊天, 吴红刚, 韦洪, 赖国泉, 尹威江, . 降雨条件下三级桥基岸坡−BFRP锚杆体系的协同变形机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 267-276.
[9] 李秋旺, 冯万里, 黄波林, 董星辰, 陈云飞, . 三峡库区涉水滑坡涌浪预测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 424-432.
[10] 赵宽耀, 许强, 陈婉琳, 彭大雷, 高登辉, . 黄土塬边漫灌区土体水入渗过程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2754-2764.
[11] 林滨强, 章德生, 简文彬, 豆红强, 王浩, 樊秀峰, . 风驱雨作用下植被斜坡稳定性响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2765-2774.
[12] 张伟, 晏飞, 王兆丰, 李邵军, . 基于物质点和深度积分耦合模型的滑坡数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2515-2526.
[13] 谌文武, 王科玉, 祁强, 张少冉, 王立, . 降水与蒸发交替作用下西北土遗址盐分迁移与赋存规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2209-2220.
[14] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[15] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 陈虹羽, 郭玉丰, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 基于变形的降雨后地震基覆型边坡劣化特性与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1789-1802.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!