岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 2122-2131.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1057

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制

张振1, 2,张朝1, 2,叶观宝1, 2,王萌1, 2,肖彦1, 2,程义3   

  1. 1. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092; 3. 杭州都市高速公路有限公司,浙江 杭州 310024
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-17 修回日期:2019-11-21 出版日期:2020-06-11 发布日期:2020-08-02
  • 作者简介:张振,男,1984年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事软基处理研究与教学工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51508408,No.41772281);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No.22120180106);浙江省交通投资集团有限公司科技项目计划(No.201813)。

Progressive failure mechanism of stiffened deep mixed column-supported embankment

ZHANG Zhen1, 2, ZHANG Zhao1, 2, YE Guan-bao1, 2, WANG Meng1, 2, XIAO Yan1, 2, CHENG Yi3   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Hangzhou Metropolitan Expressway Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310024, China
  • Received:2019-06-17 Revised:2019-11-21 Online:2020-06-11 Published:2020-08-02
  • Contact: 叶观宝,男,1964年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事软土地基处理技术及理论研究。E-mail: ygb1030@126.com E-mail:dyzhangzhen@126.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51508408, 41772281), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(22120180106) and the Research Program of Zhejiang Communications Investment Group Co., Ltd.(201813).

摘要: 劲芯水泥土桩是一种软土地基处理的新方法,近年来已成功应用于公路、铁路路基处理工程中。然而由于人们对其承载路堤的失稳破坏机制认识不足,无法正确指导设计。采用反映桩体材料破坏后特征的应变软化模型,模拟劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤失稳破坏1g模型试验,通过分析路堤失稳破坏过程中桩体塑性区的开展和桩身受力的变化情况,研究了桩体的破坏顺序及其破坏模式。结果表明:路堤失稳过程中,劲芯水泥土桩并非同时发生破坏,路面正下方桩体首先发生受压破坏,坡面下方桩体自坡脚至坡肩依次发生弯剪破坏;由于桩体的存在,路基中滑动面并非完全穿过桩体破坏位置。基于桩体破坏顺序、破坏模式、受力情况变化,以及荷载传递规律,阐释了劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制。采用现行规范中基于残余强度的柔性桩处理方法,计算的安全系数与试验结果较为接近,但其适用性还需做进一步研究。

关键词: 劲芯水泥土桩, 路堤, 应变软化, 渐进式破坏, 数值模拟

Abstract: Stiffened deep mixed (SDM) column is a new ground improvement method for soft soil foundations, and has been successfully applied in ground improvement projects in roadways and railways recently. However, due to inadequate understanding of the instability mechanism of the embankment supported by SDM column, there is no mature theory to guide the design. In this paper, strain-softening model, which can reflect the post-failure behavior of column materials, was used to model the scale-down 1g model test of stability of SDM column-supported embankment. The sequence and modes of SDM column failure were investigated through examining the developments of plastic zone and force changes in SDM columns in the failure process. The results showed that the columns did not fail simultaneously in the process of embankment failure. The columns near the center of embankment failed by compression at first, followed by the sequence bending failures of the columns under embankment slope from the toe to the shoulder. The slip surface did not completely pass through the failure positons of the columns due to the existence of columns. Accordingly, the failure mechanism of SDM column-supported embankment was interpreted. The semi-rigid column method based on residual strength in the currently-used code yielded close factor of safety to the model test, but its feasibility still needs a further study.

Key words: stiffened deep mixed column, embankment, strain-softening, progressive failure, numerical simulation

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[3] 吴嘉园, 王华宁, 宋飞, 胡韬, 蒋明镜, . 考虑能源土软化特性及钻采全过程的井壁稳定半解析模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2121-2134.
[4] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[5] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[6] 李林, 张等红, 张淼, 顾晓强, 徐龙飞, . 考虑水-力耦合的桩-非饱和黄土接触面荷载传递模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1343-1355.
[7] 张佩, 杨承儒, 侯世伟, 杜修力, . 基于内聚力单元的土石混合体细观数值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1620-1631.
[8] 张玲, 彭搏程, 徐泽宇, 赵明华, . 基于桩身弯曲破坏的路堤下筋箍碎石桩复合地基稳定分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 413-421.
[9] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[10] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[11] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[12] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[13] 许国庆, 黄高翔, 王协康, 罗登泽, 李洪涛, 姚强, . 新型弧形聚能爆破作用下的岩石破裂演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
[14] 王帅, 王豫徽, 王玲, 李佳祺, 赵梓皓, 庞凯旋, . 基于晶体模型的岩石孔隙结构与矿物组成对裂纹扩展影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[15] 杨立. 平板载荷试验数值分析及承载力判定标准研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!