岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2461-2469.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1374

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

地震作用下岩羊村滑坡稳定性与失稳机制研究

杜文杰1, 2，盛谦1, 2，付晓东1，汤华1，陈贺1, 2，杜宇翔1, 2，周永强1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室，湖北 武汉 430071；2. 中国科学院大学，北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-07 修回日期:2019-12-16 出版日期:2020-07-10 发布日期:2020-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 盛谦，男，1962年生，博士，研究员，主要从事工程岩体力学性质与稳定性评价、地质灾害防治等方面的研究工作。E-mail: qsheng@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail: dwj_7490@163.com
  • 作者简介:杜文杰，男，1995年生，硕士研究生，主要从事地质灾害防治的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划资助（No. 2018YFC0809400）；国家自然科学基金（No. 51779250）；中国科学院国际合作局国际伙伴计划项目 （No. 131551KYSB20180042）；云南省交通科技项目《云交科教[2017]33号》

Dynamic stability analysis and failure mechanism of Yanyang village landslide under earthquake

DU Wen-jie1, 2, SHENG Qian1, 2, FU Xiao-dong1, TANG Hua1, CHEN He1, 2, DU Yu-xiang1, 2, ZHOU Yong-qiang1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2019-08-07 Revised:2019-12-16 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC0809400), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51779250), the International Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (131551KYSB20180042) and the Traffic Science, Technology and Education Project of Yunnan Province ([2017] 33).

PDF (Chinese)

255

摘要： 以云南香丽高速公路沿线的岩羊村滑坡为研究对象，开展了滑坡动力稳定性评价及失稳机制研究：进行了不同烈度地震下的滑坡稳定性分析，采用滑带弹性区体积占比的变化反映其失稳过程，结合滑坡变形破坏模式，对滑坡整体稳定性进行评价；针对极限地震工况，分别从时间和空间角度描述滑坡失稳过程；建立了同时考虑滑带弱化和硬化的滑坡尖点突变模型，揭示了滑坡失稳的触发机制。研究表明：滑坡在区域Ⅷ度地震烈度条件下基本保持稳定，在锁固段的“锁固作用”下滑坡仅发生局部破坏；滑坡发生整体失稳的临界峰值加速度为2.29 m/s2，其失稳机制为在前缘牵引、后缘拉裂作用下，滑带塑性区贯通导致的整体失稳；地震作用下滑带前缘、中部、后缘并非同步破坏，表现为累积?触发效应；利用改进尖点突变模型推导了刚度效应失稳判据，揭示了滑坡整体稳定性与滑带介质的刚度及尺寸特性密切相关。研究结果为岩羊村滑坡的防治与抗震设计提供了指导，并可为同类工程的动力稳定性评价与失稳机制分析所借鉴。

关键词: 滑坡, 地震, 动力稳定性, 锁固作用, 尖点突变理论, 启动机制

Abstract: Dynamic stability evaluation and failure mechanism research were performed on the Yanyang village landslide along Xiangli expressway in Yunnan province. The landslide stability analysis under different seismic intensities was carried out, the progressive failure of landslide was described by the change in volume ratio of residual elastic zone of slip zone. The dynamic stability of landslide was evaluated by combining with the deformation mode of landslide and the volume ratio of residual elastic zone. For the failure mechanism of landslide under extreme earthquake conditions, the failure process of landslide was described in terms of time and space respectively. A cusp catastrophe model of landslide, which could consider both weakening and hardening section of slip zone, was established and the trigger mechanism was revealed. The results showed that: (1) the landslide under the condition of Ⅷ degree seismic intensity remained stable, and only local failure occurred due to the "locking effect " of locking section; (2) The critical peak acceleration of overall failure of the landslide was 2.29 m/s2, and its failure mechanism was the whole failure caused by the sudden penetration of the plastic zone due to the failure of "locking action" under the coupling action of leading section traction and trailing section tension crack; (3) The leading, middle and trailing section of the slide zone were not destroyed synchronously, but presented a cumulative-triggering process. (4) A failure criterion of stiffness effect was derived based on the improved cusp catastrophe model, the overall stability of the landslide was found to be closely related to the stiffness and size characteristics of the sliding zone medium. The results could offer guidance for disaster prevention and seismic design of Yanyang village landslide, and be used for reference in the dynamic stability evaluation and failure mechanism analysis of similar projects.

Key words: landslide, earthquake, dynamic stability, locking effect, cusp catastrophe model, trigger mechanism

中图分类号: P 642.22；O 241
[1] 赵武胜, 周帅, 解佩瑶, 高厚, 秦长坤, 陈卫忠, . 考虑初衬−二衬界面效应下隧道地震易损性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 477-490.
[2] 余小越, 许明, 谢强, 蔡宇, 刘先珊, 甘峰帆, . SH波在三角形山体地形中的散射与能量分布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2639-2649.
[3] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[4] 范猛, 李敬军, 杨正权, 刘小生, 朱凯斌, 赵剑明, . 基于标准贯入试验的液化判别方法对深埋砂土适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[5] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[6] 杨景泉, 郑长杰, 丁选明, . 竖向入射P波激励下饱和土中管桩地震响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[7] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[8] 杨艳霜, 闫磊, 张占荣, 刘永莉, 崔臻, 彭剑承, 亢兆鹏, . 基于三相孔隙介质模型的地震动传播特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1109-1121.
[9] 王滢, 刘嘉怡, 高盟, 孔祥霄, . 地震作用下深海含气能源土动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 457-466.
[10] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[11] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[12] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.
[13] 何颖, 陈雅, 尹奔驰, 刘中宪, 刘旭, . 频率相关等效线性山谷交错场地多点地震动模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3280-3288.
[14] 钱法桥, 邓亚虹, 慕焕东, 杨楠, 刘凡, 王梦晨, . 基于小波变换和拟动力法的边坡地震稳定性评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 88-96.
[15] 周桓竹, 刘圣安, 李斌, 陈炜昀, 苏雷, 郑俊杰, 郑烨炜, . 穿越变化地层的沉管隧道接头地震响应的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 289-298.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发