岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9): 2891-2900.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1992

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于不同卸荷速率与路径影响下 吹填土力学特性研究

杨爱武1, 2,杨少坤1, 2,张振东2   

  1. 1. 东华大学 环境科学与工程学院,上海 201620;2. 天津城建大学 天津市软土特性与工程环境重点实验室,天津 300384
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-25 修回日期:2020-04-20 出版日期:2020-09-11 发布日期:2020-10-20
  • 作者简介:杨爱武,男,1971年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,从事软黏土力学特性及土体微观结构研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51978440);天津市科技计划项目(No.19JCZDJC39700,No.2016CJ01)。

Experimental study of mechanical properties of dredger fill under different unloading rates and stress paths

YANG Ai-wu1, 2, YANG Shao-kun1, 2, ZHANG Zhen-dong2   

  1. 1. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China; 2. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Soft Soil Characteristics and Engineering Environment, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China
  • Received:2019-11-25 Revised:2020-04-20 Online:2020-09-11 Published:2020-10-20
  • Supported by:
    The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978440) and Tianjin Science and Technology Project (19JCZDJC39700, 2016CJ01).

摘要: 运用应力路径三轴试验仪,对天津滨海吹填土开展等向固结条件下的不排水卸荷试验,探讨不同卸荷路径及卸荷速率对应力?应变关系、孔压变化规律及破坏强度特性的影响。试验结果表明:各卸荷路径下应力?应变曲都近似呈双曲线型。UU0.0(径向卸荷、轴向不卸荷)卸荷路径下试样变形表现为轴向压缩,且孔压变化曲线存在明显的屈服点;UU2.0(轴向和径向均卸荷),UU∞(轴向卸荷、径向不卸荷)及UL1.0(轴向卸荷、径向加荷)路径下试样变形表现为轴向伸长,孔压随着应变的增加而增大,最终速度减缓并趋于稳定增长状态。同种路径下,卸荷速率越大,卸荷初期孔压发展越缓慢,峰值孔压越大。对0.1、0.2、0.3 kPa/min卸荷速率下的应力?应变曲线研究发现,卸荷压缩路径下初始切线模量受卸荷速率影响较大,拉伸路径下则不明显。UL1.0路径下卸荷破坏强度最大,UU2.0路径下该值最小,UU∞路径下则居中。同一卸荷路径下,土体破坏强度随卸荷速率的增大而增大。对各应力?应变曲线进行归一化处理,构建了考虑卸荷速率及卸荷路径影响的初始切线卸荷模量和卸荷破坏强度预测公式。

关键词: 吹填土, 卸荷路径, 卸荷速率, 应力?应变, 初始卸荷模量, 卸荷破坏强度

Abstract: The undrained unloading tests of isotropic consolidation on soft dredger fill of Tianjin Binhai are performed using the stress-path triaxial apparatus to determine the effects of different unloading stress paths and unloading rates on stress-strain relationship, pore pressure variation and failure strength characteristics. Some findings are as follows. The stress-strain curves under each unloading path are approximately hyperbolic curves. Under the unloading stress path of UU0.0(radial unloading, axial not unloading), the deformation of samples exhibits axial compression, and the curves of pore pressure have sharp yield points. On the contrary, the deformation of samples under the path of UU2.0(both axial and radial unloading), UU∞(axial unloading, radial not unloading) and UL1.0(axial unloading, radial loading) show axial tension. In this way, the pore pressure increases with the increase of strain, and finally the growth rate of the pore pressure slows down and tends to increase steadily. Under the same stress paths, the larger the unloading rate, the slower the development of the pore pressure in the initial stage of unloading and the greater the peak pore pressure. The stress-strain curves at unloading rate of 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 kPa/min are found that the initial tangent modulus is greatly affected by unloading rate under unloading compression paths, while it is not influenced under the tensile paths. The value of unloading failure strength is the maximum under the UL1.0 path, the minimum in the UU2.0 path, and centered in the UU∞ path. Under the same unloading path, the failure strength increases with the increase of the unloading rate. According to the normalization of stress-strain curves, the formulas, which considers the influence of unloading rates and unloading stress paths, are developed to estimate the initial tangent modulus and the unloading failure intensity.

Key words: soft dredger fill, unloading stress path, unloading rate, stress-strain, initial unloading modulus, unloading failure strength

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 吴倩婵, 章荣军, 徐志豪, 杨钊, 郑俊杰, . 絮凝剂对固化流泥强度行为及变形特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 205-216.
[2] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[3] 张春顺, 林正鸿, 杨典森, 陈嘉瑞, . 考虑初始级配影响的粗粒土非线性弹性模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 750-760.
[4] 刘剑, 周宗红, 张晶, 王春, 侯廷凯, 乔木, . 闪长岩不同卸荷速率声发射特征及非稳定阶段识别[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 225-232.
[5] 张培森, 许大强, 颜伟, 张晓乐, 董宇航, 赵铭, . 应力-渗流耦合作用下不同卸荷路径对砂岩损伤特性及能量演化规律的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 325-339.
[6] 张建新, 马昌虎, 郎瑞卿, 孙立强, 杨爱武, 李迪, . 带围压冻融循环下滨海重塑软土力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1863-1874.
[7] 石磊, 张希巍, . 超深钻岩芯地质环境真三轴试验装置研制及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 2161-2169.
[8] 赵顺利, 杨之俊, 傅旭东, 方正, . 考虑应变局部化的粗粒料剪切损伤力学机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 31-42.
[9] 匡智浩, 李邵军, 杜灿勋, 邱士利, 吝曼卿, 杜三林, . 考虑应力变化速率的岩石脆性评价指标[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 293-300.
[10] 张树明, 蒋关鲁, 叶雄威, 蔡俊峰, 袁胜洋, 罗斌, . 基于破损参数简化的二元介质冻结粉 细砂土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1854-1864.
[11] 庄心善, 周睦凯, 陶高梁, 周 荣, 彭承鸿, 林万锋. 循环荷载下发泡聚苯乙烯改良膨胀土动弹性 模量与阻尼比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2427-2436.
[12] 杨爱武, 徐彩丽, 郎瑞卿, 王韬, . 冻融循环作用下城市污泥固化土三维力学 特性及其破坏准则[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 963-975.
[13] 刘海峰, 郑坤, 朱长歧, 孟庆山, 吴文娟. 基于应力−应变曲线的礁灰岩脆性特征评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 673-680.
[14] 吴飞鹏, 范贤章, 徐尔斯, 杨涛, 颜丙富, 刘静, . 压裂液高压渗滤对砂岩基质损伤演化的 细观力学分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3238-3248.
[15] 李丽华, 余肖婷, 肖衡林, 马强, 刘一鸣, 杨 星, . 稻壳灰加筋土力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2168-2178.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!