岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (S1): 163-170.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0455

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于不同改性方法的分散性黏土处治试验研究

刘杰1, 2,杨玉婳3,姚海林1,卢正1, 2,岳婵3   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉430071;2. 湖北省环境岩土工程重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;3. 武汉科技大学 城市建设学院,湖北 武汉 430065
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-04 修回日期:2019-07-23 出版日期:2020-06-19 发布日期:2020-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 卢正,男,1982年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事特殊土与路基工程研究工作。E-mail: lzwhrsm@163.com E-mail:liuj@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:刘杰,女,1983年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事饱和/非饱和土路基长期性能衰变机理与演化规律方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省杰出青年基金项目(No.2017CFA056);国家自然科学基金项目(No.41672312)。

Experimental study on treatment of dispersive clay based on different modification methods

LIU Jie1, 2, YANG Yu-hua3, YAO Hai-lin1, LU Zheng1, 2, YUE Chan3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Science, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Geo-Environmental Engineering, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 3. City Construction Institute, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430065, China
  • Received:2019-03-04 Revised:2019-07-23 Online:2020-06-19 Published:2020-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the outstanding youth fund of Hubei Province(2017CFA056) and the Natural Science Foundation of China(41672312).

摘要: 分散土的改性和利用是岩土工程的热点和难点问题,传统的方法是利用石灰改性,具有成本高、破坏环境等不利影响,亟需探索新的处治材料与技术。采用铝化合物和传统特殊土改性剂(石灰)分别对中国东北地区某均质大坝典型分散性黏土进行处治,研究不同类别、不同掺量的改性剂对分散性黏土物理化学性质、分散性及力学性质的影响,通过扫描电镜等微观试验,研究铝化合物改性分散性黏土的微观机制和改性机制。研究结果表明,当石灰掺量达到1%~3%、铝化合物掺量达到(2~4)×10?4 mol/g时,两者均具有较好的改性效果,且均能提高分散性黏土的抗剪强度;石灰对土样的颗粒组成没有显著影响,随着石灰掺量的增加,分散土的pH值增大,分散性得到有效抑制;在对土样产生团聚、胶结等作用方面,铝化合物可以改变土样的颗粒组成,能有效地降低土样的酸碱度,亦能达到优良的处治效果。与石灰改性分散性黏土相比,铝化合物具有环境友好、施工方便能够实现原位处治等优点,在实际工程中具有较高的应用价值。

关键词: 分散性黏土, 铝化合物, 石灰改性土, 分散性判别试验, 抗剪强度

Abstract: The modification and utilization of dispersed soil are critical issues in geotechnical engineering. The traditional modification with lime has a high cost and environmental damage and other adverse effects, so it is urgent to explore new treatment materials and technologies. Based on this, aluminum compounds and traditional special soil modifier(lime) were used to treat the typical dispersive clay in a homogeneous dam in northeastern China. The effects of different types and contents of modifiers on the physicochemical properties, dispersibility and mechanical properties of dispersive clay were investigated. The microscopic mechanism and modification mechanism of modified dispersive clay of aluminum compounds were studied by microscopic experiments such as scanning electron microscopy. The results show that when the lime content reaches 1%-3% or the aluminum compounds content reaches (2~4)×10?4 mol/g, both of the two modifiers show good modification effect and can improve the shear strength of the dispersive clay. Lime has no obvious effect on the particle composition of the soil. With the increase of lime content, the pH value of the dispersed soil increases and the dispersibility is effectively suppressed. The aluminum compounds can change the particle composition of the soil by agglomeration and cementation with the soil. Meanwhile, it can effectively reduce the pH value of the soil, which can achieve excellent improvement effects. Compared with lime-modified dispersive clay, aluminum compounds-treated soil has high application value in practical engineering with the advantages of environmental friendliness, convenient construction and in-situ treatment.

Key words: dispersive clay, aluminum compounds, lime-treated soil, dispersion identification test, shear strength

中图分类号: TU443
[1] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[2] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[3] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[4] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[5] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[6] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[7] 王军, 张凯宇, 陈晟凯, 秦伟, 倪俊峰, 高紫阳, 张一帆, . 爆破挤淤法中炸药埋深对土体参数影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 123-132.
[8] 刘吉福. 排水固结堤坝稳定分析新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 106-114.
[9] 张雅琴, 杨平, 张婷, 韩琳亮. 含盐量及冻融条件对冻融氯盐粉质黏土静动强度特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 157-166.
[10] 张化进, 吴顺川, 李兵磊, 赵宇松, . 基于高斯过程回归的岩石抗剪强度参数不确定性估测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 415-423.
[11] 朱俊宇, 裴利华, 桂跃, . 含有机质土抗剪强度再认识——基于土壤有机质赋存形态的认知[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 451-460.
[12] 冉宇玲, 张文博, 柏巍, 孔令伟, 周丽娜, 樊恒辉, . 基于孔内剪切试验的游离氧化铁对红黏土抗剪强度影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2573-2582.
[13] 冯帅, 陈盼, 周家作, 韦昌富, . 赋存环境对含甲烷水合物沉积物力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1987-1999.
[14] 张季如, 陈敬鑫, 王 磊, 彭伟珂. 三轴剪切过程中排水条件对钙质砂颗粒破碎、变形和强度特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 375-384.
[15] 杨泰华, 黄友琦, 刘滨, 康永水, 耿志, 周秀斌, . 砂质充填型节理剪切力学行为试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3645-3657.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!