岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (S1): 264-270.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0979

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

流速对桩−筏基础中能量桩换热效率 与热力耦合特性影响研究

李任融1,孔纲强1,杨庆2,孙广超3   

  1. 1. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098;2. 大连理工大学 海岸和近海工程国家重点实验室,辽宁 大连 116024; 3. 中国建筑第八工程局有限公司,上海 200135
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-31 修回日期:2019-10-16 出版日期:2020-06-19 发布日期:2020-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 孔纲强,男,1982年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事能源地下结构、透明土试验技术方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: gqkong1@163.com E-mail: rrlihhu@163.com
  • 作者简介:李任融,男,1994年生,博士研究生,主要从事能量桩技术方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51778212)

Study on influence of flow velocity on heat transfer efficiency and thermal coupling characteristics of energy piles in pile-raft foundation

LI Ren-rong1, KONG Gang-qiang1, YANG Qing2, SUN Guang-chao3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China; 3. China Construction Eighth Engineering Division. Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200135, China
  • Received:2019-05-31 Revised:2019-10-16 Online:2020-06-19 Published:2020-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51778212).

摘要: 能量桩是一种承担上部建筑荷载并传递浅层地温能的新型桩基技术,其换热效率和附加温度应力是该技术的两个关键性科学问题。已有的研究主要针对单根能量桩的热力耦合特性,对于桩?筏基础中能量桩的研究相对较少。基于桩?筏基础,开展不同换热液流速下单根3U型埋管能量桩换热效率和热力耦合特性现场试验,在实测制冷工况下研究能量桩桩体温度与应力、筏板温度与变形的变化规律,探讨入口流速的影响规律。研究结果表明,文中试验条件和制冷工况下能量桩在0.8、0.4、0.2 m/s三种流速下的换热效率分别为75.0、82.5、63.8 W/m;能量桩受筏板约束影响,在桩顶处产生最大约束拉应力,约为38.9 kPa,筏板下侧产生的最大约束拉应力约为47.2 kPa;随着流速逐渐降低,桩体温度小幅回升,桩身约束拉应力值减小;短期制冷工况对筏板温度的影响可忽略不计。

关键词: 桩?筏基础, 能量桩, 流速, 换热效率, 热力耦合, 现场试验

Abstract: Energy pile is a new type of pile foundation technology that bears the load of the upper building and transmits the shallow geothermal energy. Heat transfer efficiency and thermal induced stress are two key problems must be solved before energy pile can be widely applied. Present studies mainly focus on the thermo-mechanical coupling characteristics of single pile, while the researches on the thermo-mechanical characteristics of pile-raft foundation are relatively limited. Based on the pile-raft foundation, field tests on heat transfer efficiency and thermo-mechanical characteristics under different velocities were carried out. The temperature and stress changes of both energy pile and raft under cooling condition were measured and analysed. The influence caused by different velocities was also discussed. The results show that when the energy pile is running at the velocities of 0.8, 0.4, 0.2 m/s, the corresponding heat transfer efficiency are around 75.0, 82.5, 63.8 W/m. Under the influence of raft restraint, the maximum constrained tensile stress of pile is about 38.9 kPa, which is generated in the top of the pile; and the maximum constrained tensile stress of raft is about 47.2 kPa, which is in the bottom side of the raft. As the velocity of flow decreases, the temperature of pile rises slightly is increased and the value of tensile stress decreases. The influence of short-term cooling condition on the temperature of the raft is negligible.

Key words: pile-raft foundation, energy pile, test velocity, heat transfer efficiency, thermal-mechanical coupling, field test

中图分类号: TU473
[1] 常洪林, 孔纲强, 王福慧, 王成龙, 周杨, . 褥垫层作用下预应力高强混凝土能量桩热力响应特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1240-1251.
[2] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[3] 陈骞, 王志良, 申林方, 华涛, 李邵军, 徐则民, . 基于热力耦合的近场动力学方法高温岩石水力压裂数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2502-2514.
[4] 冉逸涵, 肖世国, 廖家前, 王础, . 土-石混合填土强夯动应力的简化与修正算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1121-1128.
[5] 蒋济泽, 王成龙, 黄煜镔, 赵华, 陈志雄, . 竖向和水平组合荷载下能量桩单桩变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 788-796.
[6] 文磊, 刘 钟, 马晓华, 张振. 粉土地基中劲性复合桩抗压承载特性与荷载传递机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 511-524.
[7] 常文正, 王天亮, 王林, . 水热力作用下铁路基床翻浆冒泥力学特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3304-3314.
[8] 刘欣, 沈宇鹏, 刘志坚, 王炳禄, 刘越, 韩昀希. 地下水流速对地铁联络通道冻结壁形成过程影响的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2667-2678.
[9] 陈慧芸, 冯忠居, 白少奋, 董建松, 夏承明, 蔡杰, . 桥梁桩基穿越溶洞的荷载传递机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1405-1415.
[10] 金佳旭, 朱磊, 刘磊, 陈亿军, 姚远, 高腾飞, 李若欣, . 填埋场单井注气气体压力监测试验及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 259-267.
[11] 陶志刚, 郭爱鹏, 何满潮, 张瑨, 夏敏, 王鼎, 李梦楠, 朱珍, . 微观负泊松比锚杆静力学特性及其工程应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 808-818.
[12] 常洲, 张留俊, 黄平明, 晏长根, 贾卓龙, 徐合清, . 炭质页岩的颗粒破碎及其路用性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3117-3126.
[13] 夏洋洋, 方宏远, 张超, 潘艳辉, 翟文博, 石明生, . 顶管施工对新型复合装配式支护工作井的 力学响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2799-2808.
[14] 沈宇鹏, 王笃礼, 林园榕, 汤天笑, 刘欣, . 越冬基坑水平冻胀的防治措施效果分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1434-1442.
[15] 杨军, 孙晓立, 卞德存, 邵继喜, . 基于平行地震波法探测桩基缺陷的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 874-881.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!