岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 3328-3334.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0317

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

风积沙地基金属装配式基础的真型试验研究

冯衡1,高斐略1,刘观仕2,高彬1,肖飞2,曾二贤1   

  1. 1. 中国电力工程顾问集团 中南电力设计院有限公司,湖北 武汉 430071; 2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-04 修回日期:2021-07-07 出版日期:2021-12-13 发布日期:2021-12-14
  • 通讯作者: 刘观仕,男,1974年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事特殊土的工程力学特性研究工作。E-mail: gsliu@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:fengheng@csepdi.com
  • 作者简介:冯衡,男,1979年生,学士,高级工程师,主要从事架空输电线路土建设计工作。
  • 基金资助:
    中国电力工程顾问集团有限公司2018年度新开科技项目(No.DG1-T03-2018)

Full-scale tests of steel grillage foundation in aeolian sand areas

FENG Heng1, GAO Fei-lüe1, LIU Guan-shi2, GAO Bin1, XIAO Fei2, ZENG Er-xian1   

  1. 1. Zhongnan Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2021-03-04 Revised:2021-07-07 Online:2021-12-13 Published:2021-12-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the New Science and Technology Projects of China Power Engineering Consulting Group in 2018(DG1-T03-2018).

摘要: 越来越多输电线路穿过风积沙覆盖的沙漠地区,金属装配式基础具有良好的适用性,但目前现场试验研究甚少。在毛乌素沙地南缘的陕西榆林地区,开展多组风积沙地基金属装配式基础的真型上拔试验,测试与分析基础的上拔承载力、上拔与地表位移、支架与底板应力、上部土压力等参数变化。研究结果表明:金属装配式基础的上拔荷载?位移曲线形态与扩展基础类似,可分为近似直线段、塑性过渡段和直线失稳段;上拔累计竖向位移达到21~23 mm时,基础进入极限状态;加载过程中基础顶部周围地表若出现细小裂缝,并沿对角线方向扩展,则基础在下一级荷载下进入极限状态;通过分析基础上部土压力的变化特征,可发现基础上拔破裂面上的破裂点,据此推算出实际上拔角;现有规范中土重法计算的上拔承载力,相较极限上拔承载力试验值偏大,建议相关地区基础设计时上拔角取为19.0o~19.5o。

关键词: 风积沙, 金属装配式基础, 真型试验, 上拔, 极限承载力

Abstract: More and more transmission lines pass through the desert area covered by aeolian sand, and steel grillage foundation has good applicability, but there are few field tests at present. In Yulin area of Shaanxi Province, southern edge of Maowusu sandy land, several groups of full-scale uplift tests of steel grillage foundation in aeolian sand ground were carried out, and the uplift bearing capacity, uplift and surface displacement, support and floor stress, upper earth pressure and other parameters were tested and analyzed. The results show that the uplift load-displacement curve of the steel grilage foundation is similar to that of the spread foundation, which can be divided into the approximate straight section, plastic transition section and linear instability section. When the cumulative uplift displacement reaches 21-23 mm, the foundation comes to the limit state. If small cracks appear on the ground surface around the top of the foundation during loading and propagate along the diagonal direction, the foundation will enter the limit state under the next level load. By analyzing the variation characteristics of the earth pressure on the upper part of the foundation, the fracture point on the uplift fracture surface of the foundation can be found, and the actual uplift angle can be calculated. The uplift bearing capacity calculated by the soil weight method in the existing codes is larger than the test value of ultimate uplift bearing capacity. It is suggested that the uplift angle should be 19.0o to 19.5o in the foundation design of relevant areas.

Key words: aeolian sand, steel grillage foundation, full-scale test, uplift, ultimate bearing capacity

中图分类号: TU472
[1] 胡伟, 曾攀煜, 王辉, 刘顺凯, 陈秋南, PUIG DAMIANS I, . 黏性土地基中水平条形锚板上拔承载力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1731-1744.
[2] 吴林玉, 缪林昌, 孙潇昊, . 聚丙烯酰胺对酶诱导碳酸盐沉淀固沙效果影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1573-1580.
[3] 赵崇熙, 徐超, 王清明, 张胜, 李昊煜, . 土工合成材料加筋土桥台极限承载力的离心载荷试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1643-1650.
[4] 颜然, 孔纲强, 于江华, . 砂土地基中钻进比对螺旋桩安装性能和抗拔承载性能的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1778-1788.
[5] 熊根, 付栋康, 朱斌, 赖莹, . 软黏土中吸力锚承载特性离心试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1472-1480.
[6] 周志雄, 周凤玺, 曹小林, 汪镇, . 复合地基极限承载力的变分极限平衡法分析——竖向增强[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3748-3754.
[7] 崔金虎, 王路君, 叶智刚, 燕秉法, 黄家晟, 朱斌, . 循环温度荷载下高温管道-软土地基相互作用模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3286-3294.
[8] 田升奎, 刘观仕, 赵青松, 徐国方, 蔡铭炫, . 基于图像RGB信息测试湿度场技术的风积沙毛细水上升试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2525-2536.
[9] 杜炜, 聂如松, 李列列, 谭永长, 张杰, 祁延录, . 考虑不同边界条件的风积沙−土工格栅拉拔试验离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1849-1862.
[10] 何杰, 郭端伟, 宋德新, 刘孟鑫, 张磊, 文奇峰, . 循环荷载下楔形劲芯水泥土复合桩工作特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1353-1362.
[11] 黄炜, 简文彬, 杨坚, 豆红强, 罗金妹, . 多支盘锚杆的原型试验与荷载传递特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 520-530.
[12] 雷勇, 陈于斯, 谭豪, 李鹏甲, 刘运思, 于艺林, . 下伏空洞桥梁群桩桩端岩层极限承载力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3339-3348.
[13] 钟紫蓝, 韩春堂, 李锦强, 赵鑫, 缪惠全. 浅埋管道水平横向作用下砂土极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 95-103.
[14] 朱鸿鹄, 高宇新, 李元海, 倪钰菲, . 土工格栅加筋砂土中水平锚板抗拔特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1207-1214.
[15] 汪嘉钰, 刘润, 姬永红, 杨旭, 陈广思, 王晓磊, . 筒型基础水平向和抗倾承载力的极限分析上限解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 777-788.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!