岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1453-1461.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1505

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于增量分析的堆石坝瞬变-流变参数联合反演

朱晟1, 2,张远1, 2,加力别克·阿哈力别克1, 2,喻建清3,何兆升3   

  1. 1. 河海大学 水文水资源与水利水电工程科学国家重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098;2. 河海大学 水利水电学院,江苏 南京 210098; 3.中国电建昆明勘测设计研究院有限公司,云南 昆明 650051
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-08 修回日期:2020-12-21 出版日期:2021-05-11 发布日期:2021-05-08
  • 作者简介:朱晟,男,1965 年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土石坝等水工岩土与环境岩土方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No. 2017YFC0404805,No. 2017YFC0404801)

Joint inversion method of instantaneous and creep parameters of rockfill dam based on incremental analysis

ZHU Sheng1, 2, ZHANG Yuan1, 2, JIALIBIEKE Ahalibieke1, 2, YU Jian-qing3, HE Zhao-sheng3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology, Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 2. College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 3. Power China Kunming Engineering Corporation Limited, Kunming, Yunnan 650051, China
  • Received:2020-10-08 Revised:2020-12-21 Online:2021-05-11 Published:2021-05-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Plan (2017YFC0404805,2017YFC0404801).

摘要: 结合南欧江7级面板坝的原型监测资料,提出了基于增量分析的堆石坝瞬变-流变参数联合反演方法。利用停工期或相对停工期堆石体的变形,对流变与瞬变本构模型参数的解耦,在免疫遗传算法的基础上反演了堆石的增量流变模型和E-B模型参数,并分析了当前广泛使用的水管式沉降仪测量结果可靠性和反演分析的精度。结果表明:(1)依据现行规范得到的堆石料室内试验结果,高估了现场填筑体的力学参数,计算沉降比大坝实际值减小了28%;(2)由于埋设时间滞后于大坝填筑过程以及土拱效应的存在,使得水管式沉降仪的实测沉降量比大坝实际沉降量减小45%,水管式沉降仪的实测变形不能直接应用于反演分析;(3)根据现场仪器埋设情况,建立了漏测量与沟槽内外土压力比的函数关系式,可修正水管式沉降仪测值;(4)分时段的增量反演方法可避免水管式沉降仪测量过程存在的“漏测与少测”等系统误差,得到计算值与实际变形吻合较好,更适用于土石坝力学参数反演分析。

关键词: 堆石坝, 监测变形, 流变, 有限元, 反演分析, 土拱效应

Abstract: Based on the original monitoring data of Nanoujiang VII grade CFRD, a joint inversion method of transient-rheological parameters for rockfill dam based on the incremental analysis was proposed. The parameters of the incremental rheological model and E-B model of rockfill were inversed using the immune genetic algorithm. The reliability of the measurement results and the accuracy of the inversion analysis of hydraulic overflow settlement gauge were studied. The results show that: (1) The laboratory test parameters of the rockfill materials obtained according to the current norms are much higher than the parameters of the practical field filling body, and the calculated settlement is 28% less than the measured value of the dam. (2) Due to the fact that the embedding time lags behind the actual filling process of the dam and the existence of the soil arching effect, the measured settlement from the hydraulic overflow settlement gauge is 45% less than the actual settlement of the dam. The measured deformation cannot be directly used for the inversion analysis. (3) According to the embedded condition of the field monitoring instruments, the function relation between the leakage measurement and the ratio of inside soil pressure to outside soil pressure of the trench is established, which can be used to correct the measured value of the hydraulic overflow settlement gauge. (4) The incremental inversion method in different periods can avoid the miss and less measurement value in the measurement process of the hydraulic overflow settlement gauge. The calculated value is in good agreement with the actual deformation, and therefore it is more suitable for the back analysis of mechanical parameters of earth-rockfill dams.

Key words: rockfill dam, deformation monitoring, creep, finite element, back analysis, soil arching effect

中图分类号: TV 641.4
[1] 张宪成, 池宝涛, 于先泽, 郭前建, 袁伟, 张耀明, . 面向近场有限元法的非结构网格划分及其断裂损伤分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 467-476.
[2] 聂耀武, 胡兵, 顾雷雨, 李槟, 周全超, 李文辉, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 二氧化碳地质封存协同上覆煤矿开采的安全风险评估数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 491-506.
[3] 许江, 李艾峰, 彭守建, 陈奕安, 汤杨, 侯亚彬, 罗利威, . 基于广义应力松弛特性的岩石时效性数值模拟方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2943-2954.
[4] 张弛, 邓龙传, 庄欠伟, 李晓昭, 王秋平, 乔梁, . 基于试验和数值模拟的滚刀旋转破岩受力和效率研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2995-3006.
[5] 陈灯红, 张心瀚, 刘云辉, 胡昊文, 刘云龙, 梁羽翔, . 基于八叉树比例边界有限元法的高拱坝-不规则地基-库水系统非线性地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2586-2599.
[6] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[7] 芮瑞, LIN A H, 杨俊超, 杨硕, . 被动活动门试验中的土拱效应演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1657-1666.
[8] 崔纪飞, 吴祯祯, 李林, 饶平平, . 考虑土体流变的新旧混合群桩变刚度调平研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1897-1906.
[9] 孙珊珊, 贾世文, 梁忠旭, 刘墨林, 张常光. 基于填土荷载传递二项式分布模式的沟埋式涵洞竖向土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1501-1510.
[10] 周鹏发, 申玉生, 高登, 张熙, 黄海峰, 高波, . 基于混合有限元的显式时域完美匹配层研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1605-1619.
[11] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[12] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[13] 王洪涛, 刘容利, 赵晓东, 赵耀辉, 赵万里, . 钢管桩-灌注桩复合支护下桩间土拱力学效应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1228-1239.
[14] 周波翰, 张文利, 王栋. 球形贯入仪预测超固结土强度的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[15] 武孝天, 姚仰平, 魏然, 崔文杰. 基于统一硬化模型的隧道施工引发土体变形数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1013-1024.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!