岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9): 2507-2517.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1962

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

含气土地基热水气力耦合时变行为分析

黄家晟1, 2,王路君1, 2,刘燕晶1, 2,王心博1, 2,朱斌1, 2   

  1. 1. 浙江大学 软弱土与环境土工教育部重点实验室,浙江 杭州 310058;2. 浙江大学 超重力研究中心,浙江 杭州 310058
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-30 修回日期:2021-05-31 出版日期:2021-09-10 发布日期:2021-08-30
  • 通讯作者: 王路君,男,1985年生,博士,副教授,主要从事海洋岩土工程和能源岩土工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: lujunwang@zju.edu.cn E-mail:zgzjshzsgsqhjs@126.com
  • 作者简介:黄家晟,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事海洋岩土工程多场耦合作用研究。
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省自然科学基金(No.LY21E080026,No.LCD19E090001);国家自然科学基金项目(No.52078458,No.51988101,No.51708494)

Time-dependent behaviour of thermal-hydro-mechanical coupling of gassy soils

HUANG Jia-sheng1, 2, WANG Lu-jun1, 2, LIU Yan-jing1, 2, WANG Xin-bo1, 2, ZHU Bin1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. Center for Hypergravity Experimental and Interdisciplinary Research, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
  • Received:2020-12-30 Revised:2021-05-31 Online:2021-09-10 Published:2021-08-30
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China(LY21E080026, LCD19E090001) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(52078458, 51988101, 51708494).

摘要: 含气土广泛存在于我国长三角、珠三角等滨海地区,气体通常在孔隙内以离散封闭气相的形式赋存。封闭气相对温度和压力变化敏感,导致土体压缩性、渗透性等改变。针对封闭气相热膨胀和土骨架蠕变特性对滨海含气软土固结过程的影响,基于精细积分法(precise integration method,简称PIM)对含气地基热水气力耦合时变行为开展研究。在控制方程中引入考虑温度和压力影响的气相体积变化因子反映封闭气相热膨胀特性,采用分数阶Merchant流变模型描述骨架的蠕变过程,基于稳定性好和计算精度高的PIM并结合积分变换获得考虑蠕变效应的含气土多场多相耦合问题的解。对比所得解答与饱和土热水力耦合问题解析解和固结问题有限元结果,验证其有效性。针对不同饱和度、不同黏滞系数的含气地基,探讨了气相膨胀、骨架蠕变效应对地基时变行为的影响。研究发现含气地基的黏滞系数对热固结过程影响显著,地基蠕变效应对位移的影响大于孔压,当黏滞系数大于1×1012 MPa·s时孔压与弹性地基相近,而变形过程被大幅延缓;地基中封闭气相膨胀会显著提高孔压峰值和位移幅值,对埋地高温管线等产生不利影响;对于Gibson地基,采用平均剪切模量计算孔压往往导致不可忽略的偏差,预测表面位移时偏差一般小于5%。

关键词: 含气土, 黏弹性, 热水气力耦合, 时变行为, 精细积分法

Abstract: Gassy soils are widely distributed in offshore sediments around Yangtze River and Pearl River in China. The pore gas usually exists in the form of discrete bubbles and is sensitive to the variation of the temperature and the pressure, which in turn leads to the changes of soil properties such as compressibility and permeability. Thus, to investigate the influence of thermal expansion of occluded gas phase and creep deformation of soil structures on the consolidation process of gassy soil in the offshore region, a study of thermos-hydro-mechanical coupling (THM) behavior of gassy soil is conducted based on the viscoelastic model. In the governing equations, the change of gas phase volume subjected to thermal and mechanical loadings is introduced to take the thermal expansion into consideration. The fractional derivative Merchant model is also adopted to describe the process of rock creep. In addition, these problems are solved by precise integration method (PIM), which proves to be efficient and several orders more precise than conventional numerical methods, combining with integral transform. For verification, the results obtained by this newly proposed method are compared with the analytical solution for THM problems of saturated soils and numerical prediction by FEM for consolidation problems. Typical examples with different saturations and viscosity coefficients are performed to investigate the effects of viscoelasticity and thermal expansion of gas phase on the time-dependent behavior of gassy soils. It is found that the viscosity has a significant impact on the thermal consolidation process. The creep characteristic shows a greater influence on deformation than the excess pore pressure. When the viscosity coefficient is greater than 1×1012 MPa·s, the excess pore pressure is similar to that of elastic soil foundation, and meantime the deformation process is obviously delayed. The occluded gas phase increases the peak values of excess pore pressure and surface deformation, which may reduce the stability of buried pipelines with high temperature. For Gibson soils, using the means of shear modulus to predict the excess pore pressure may result in non-ignorable deviations but the predicted surface deformation is with a deviation of less than 5%.

Key words: gassy soils, viscoelasticity, thermo-hydro-mechanical coupling, time-dependent behaviour, precise integration method

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 张治国, 陈胤吉, 朱正国, 魏纲, 孙苗苗, . 软土小曲率盾构隧道开挖诱发黏弹性地层沉降的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 309-321.
[2] 邹诗环, 黄茂松, 时振昊, . 高饱和度含气土动力问题的有限体积法分步解法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1286-1293.
[3] 周航, 汪义圣, 亓戈平, . 黏弹性土中异形桩横向动力响应半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 761-774.
[4] 王学滨, 陈双印, 郑一方, 廖裴彬, . 考虑蠕变剪裂的拉格朗日元与离散元耦合方法及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 613-624.
[5] 马强, 杨奕琪, 周凤玺, 邵帅, . 热黏弹性介质中波的传播特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 303-314.
[6] 谢森林, 胡安峰, 肖志荣, 汪美慧, 胡训健, 陈俞超, . 基于广义Voigt模型的半渗透边界隧道周围饱和软土固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2024-2036.
[7] 柳鸿博, 戴国亮, 周凤玺, 龚志宇, 陈智伟, . 黏弹性非饱和土中劲性复合桩纵向动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1365-1377.
[8] 周凤玺, 孙烈璞, 柳鸿博, 曹小林, 梁玉旺, . 分数阶黏弹性饱和地基中大直径管桩竖向动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3481-3490.
[9] 师文佳, 丛琳, 杨多兴, . 饱和黏弹性孔隙介质中压缩波的频散与衰减[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2900-2906.
[10] 李博南, 符伟, 张雪冰, . 高温、高含冰量冻土中弹性波的传播特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1916-1924.
[11] 李小军, 任朋亮, 王玉石, 李再先, 钟康明, 董青, . 不同形状三维凹陷地形场地对地震动影响比较分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3327-3338.
[12] 汪晔欢, 王勇, 孔令伟, 陈成, 郭爱国, . 基于原位多功能孔压静力触探的含浅层气地层 识别与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3474-3483.
[13] 艾智勇, 谷甘霖, 李攀聪, . 分数阶黏弹性饱和地基与水平受荷群桩的 相互作用分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 2933-2940.
[14] 卢一为, 丁选明, 刘汉龙, 郑长杰, . 均匀黏弹性地基中X形桩纵向振动 响应简化解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2472-2479.
[15] 魏匡民, 陈生水, 马洪玉, 李国英, 米占宽, . 黏弹性方法用于面板堆石坝动力分析时必要的改进[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3475-3484.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!