岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10): 2852-2860.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.2139

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于预制滑动面的饱和黏土−结构物界面强度特性 三轴试验研究

苏新斌1, 2,廖晨聪1, 2,刘世奥2,张璐璐2   

  1. 1. 上海交通大学 海洋工程国家重点实验室,上海 200240; 2. 上海交通大学 船舶海洋与建筑工程学院,上海 200240
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-20 修回日期:2022-06-29 出版日期:2022-10-19 发布日期:2022-10-18
  • 通讯作者: 廖晨聪,男,1990年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事海洋岩土力学方面的工作。E-mail: billaday@sjtu.edu.cn E-mail:sjtusxb@sjtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:苏新斌,男,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事海洋岩土试验方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    上海市自然科学基金(No. 20ZR1426100);上海市教委科研创新计划(No. 2021-01-07-00-02-E00089);上海市教委晨光计划(No. 20CG15)。

Triaxial test for strength characteristics of saturated clay-structure interface based on prefabricated sliding surface

SU Xin-bin1, 2, LIAO Chen-cong1, 2, LIU Shi-ao2, ZHANG Lu-lu2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China; 2. School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • Received:2021-12-20 Revised:2022-06-29 Online:2022-10-19 Published:2022-10-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (20ZR1426100), the Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (2021-01-07-00-02-E00089) and the "Chenguang Program" of Shanghai Education Development Foundation (20CG15).

摘要: 通过预制含一定倾角、钻孔的斜截面结构物与饱和黏土结合为三轴组合试样,并使用三轴仪测量出饱和黏土与结构物界面的抗剪强度和超孔隙水压力,分析了饱和黏土与结构物界面的强度特性。相比传统界面直剪试验无法区分界面强度特性的剪切速率效应和排水状态效应,该试验方法可以使饱和黏土与结构物界面充分饱和并严格控制界面排水状态,明确剪切速率对界面强度的影响。开展了不同结构面粗糙度和剪切速率的界面三轴固结不排水剪切试验与不同剪切速率的界面直剪试验。试验结果表明:相同围压下随着结构面粗糙程度增大,界面抗剪强度和超孔隙水压力增大;剪切速率越快,界面抗剪强度越大,界面超孔隙水压力达到稳定所需要的轴向应变越大。排水条件的严格控制和界面超孔隙水压力的准确量测对饱和黏土与结构物界面摩擦角的测量十分重要。

关键词: 界面强度, 剪切速率, 粗糙度, 饱和黏土, 超孔隙水压力, 应力比

Abstract: The strength characteristics of the interface between saturated clay and structure were analyzed by triaxial instrument. Shear strength and excess pore water pressure at the interface between saturated clay and structure were measured by prefabricating an inclined and drilled structure surface, forming a triaxial composite sample with saturated clay. Compared to the interface direct shearing test which can not distinguish the shearing rates effect and drainage effect of the interface strength characteristics, the proposed method can accurately control the drainage conditions and clarify the influence of the shearing rates on the interface strength. Triaxial consolidated undrained interface shear tests with various surface roughness and shearing rates were carried out. Direct interface shear tests under various shearing rates were also conducted. Results show that the shear strength and excess pore water pressure increase with the increase of the roughness of the structural surface under the same confining pressure. The shear strength and the axial strain required for the stability of excess pore water pressure at the interface increase with the increase of shearing rates. Strict control of drainage conditions and accurate measurement of excess pore water pressure at the interface are of great significance for measuring the interface friction angle between saturated clay and structure.

Key words: interface strength, shearing rates, roughness, saturated clay, excess pore water pressure, stress ratio

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 刘欣宇, 李亚博. 含水率和剪切速率对黏性滑带土剪切行为及损伤演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2471-2482.
[2] 王梦洁, 张莎莎, 杨晓华, 张超, 晏长根, . 循环荷载作用下漫灌区粉质黏土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1215-1227.
[3] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[4] 薛熠, 杨博鹍, 刘勇, 孙强, 张云, 曹正正, . 液氮循环冷冲击作用下高温花岗岩I型断裂特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 422-436.
[5] 赵扬锋, 龚政, 王凯兴, 司绪, 刘玉春, 张丽丽, 梁钦锋, . 不同粗糙度岩石界面断层滑移失稳过程电荷感应信号特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3355-3370.
[6] 董佳斌, 鲁一帆, 金毅, 董文浩, 侯鹏, 刘顺喜, 牛然. 彭水页岩节理面形貌的分形特征及基于节理粗糙度系数的各向异性表征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3549-3561.
[7] 唐译, 蔡世兴, 蔡正银. 微生物加固含细粒土砂动孔压模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3187-3196.
[8] 曹勇, 余飞, 黄康, 戴张俊, 陈善雄, 张志才, . 随机生成粗糙度的岩石-混凝土界面破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 315-326.
[9] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[10] 苗柯韩, 黄勇, 马晓凡, 王超琦. 基于分形理论的岩体粗糙裂隙中溶质运移预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2527-2538.
[11] 宋洋, 王贺平, 张维东, 赵立财, 周健华, 毛镜涵, . 恒定法向刚度条件下加锚充填节理岩体剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2695-2706.
[12] 王立安, 余云燕, 任新, 陈辉, . 循环荷载作用下分数阶饱和黏土地基的动力固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2279-2289.
[13] 谢森林, 胡安峰, 肖志荣, 汪美慧, 胡训健, 陈俞超, . 基于广义Voigt模型的半渗透边界隧道周围饱和软土固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2024-2036.
[14] 冷伍明, 丁荣锋, 杨奇, 陈琛, 邓煜晨, 徐方, 阮波, . 粗糙度对单桩竖向承载变形特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1597-1607.
[15] 金丹丹, 鲁先东, 王炳辉, 施展, 张雷, . 冲击荷载下含夹层饱和砂土孔压变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1081-1091.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!