岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 2983-2992.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.2156

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

主动围压作用下混凝土-花岗岩组合体抗压力学 特性与强度预测模型研究

高欢1,翟越1, 2,汪铁楠1,李宇白1, 2,王铭1,李艳1, 2   

  1. 1. 长安大学 地质工程与测绘学院,陕西 西安 710064;2. 长安大学 西部矿产资源与地质工程教育部重点实验室,陕西 西安 710064
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-23 修回日期:2022-07-13 出版日期:2022-11-11 发布日期:2022-11-29
  • 通讯作者: 翟越,男,1975年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土损伤理论的研究工作。E-mail: zy@chd.edu.cn E-mail:2019026033@chd.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:高欢,女,1994年生,博士,主要从事岩石动力学方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.41772277,No.41941019);陕西省自然科学基础研究项目(No.2020JQ-373)。

Compressive mechanical properties and strength prediction model of concrete-granite combined body under active confining pressure

GAO Huan1, ZHAI Yue1, 2, WANG Tie-nan1, LI Yu-bai1, 2, WANG Ming1, LI Yan1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Geological Engineering and Geomatics, Chang'an University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710064, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Western China's Mineral Resources and Geological Engineering of Ministry of Education, Chang'an University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710064, China
  • Received:2021-12-23 Revised:2022-07-13 Online:2022-11-11 Published:2022-11-29
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41772277, 41941019) and the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi (2020JQ-373).

摘要: 混凝土-花岗岩组合体属于工程中典型的二元材料,在三轴条件下表现出与单体不同的力学响应特性。对混凝土单体(concrete monomer,简称CM)、花岗岩单体(granite monomer,简称GM)、混凝土-花岗岩组合体(concrete-granite combined body,简称CGCB)进行不同围压下的准静态压缩试验,通过扫描电子显微镜(scanning electron microscope,简称SEM)观察CGCB破坏后断口和界面的微观结构,并利用RFPA模拟CGCB的破坏过程,揭示组合体试件的整体裂纹扩展和破坏机制。最后基于Mohr-Coulomb强度准则建立了组合体三轴抗压强度预测模型。结果表明:组合体的单(三)轴抗压强度与材料尺寸效应和界面约束效应有关;随围压增大,组合体破坏状态由单轴的“Y”型劈裂破坏转变为混凝土组分剪切破坏;数值模拟结果表明,不同围压条件下远离界面的混凝土和界面近区的花岗岩依次发生损伤,逐渐形成贯通剪切裂纹,导致花岗岩组分发生劈裂破坏;所构建的强度预测模型能和试验结果、数值模拟很好地对应,表明了模型的准确性。研究结果可为深部地下工程结构的开挖和支护提供科学依据。

关键词: 混凝土-岩石组合体, 抗压强度模型, 数值模拟, 围压, 破坏特征

Abstract: The concrete-granite combined body is a typical binary material in engineering, with mechanical response properties that differ from monomer under triaxial circumstances. Concrete monomer (CM), granite monomer (GM), and concrete-granite combination body (CGCB) were subjected to quasi-static compression tests under various confining pressures. To reveal the overall crack propagation and failure mechanism of the composite specimens, SEM was used to study the fracture and interface microstructure of CGCB, and RFPA was employed to simulate the failure process of CGCB. Finally, based on the Mohr-Coulomb strength criterion, a prediction model for composite triaxial compressive strength was developed. The results show that the uniaxial (triaxial) compressive strength of CGCB is affected by the material size effect and the interface constraint effect, and the failure condition of the combined body shifts from uniaxial "Y" splitting failure to shear failure of the concrete component when confining pressure is increased. Under various confining pressures, the concrete away from the contact and the granite near the interface are damaged in turn, and shear fractures occur progressively, resulting in the splitting failure of granite components, according to the numerical simulation findings. The strength prediction model can match experimental data and numerical simulations effectively, demonstrating the accuracy of the model. The findings of the study might serve as a scientific foundation for the excavation and support of deep subterranean engineering constructions.

Key words: concrete-rock combined body, compressive strength model, numerical simulation, confining pressure, failure characteristics

中图分类号: TU 443
[1] 王宁博, 姚仰平, 刘林, 李翔宇, 毛安琪, 李宁, . 考虑围压效应的砂土统一硬化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 297-308.
[2] 李槟, 申海萌, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 不同围压条件下花岗岩剪切过程渗透率动态演化规律数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 437-453.
[3] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[4] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[5] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[6] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[7] 肖智勇, 王刚, 刘杰, 邓华锋, 郑程程, 姜枫, . 基于等效裂隙的表观渗透率模型改进及变滑脱效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1466-1479.
[8] 汪昕, 幸安康, 曾子强, 姜祎, 徐建宇, 王晓南, 刘造保, . 层理铁矿石剪切力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1039-1048.
[9] 罗斌玉, 苏辕, 刘晓云, 黄腾达, 肖枫亦, 刘兰心, 李鹏程, . 考虑岩层倾角−围压组合效应的岩石强度行为初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 775-788.
[10] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[11] 赵飞, 石振明, 俞松波, 周圆媛, 李博, 陈建峰, 张清照, 郑鸿超. 层状岩质边坡动力失稳及加固研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3585-3614.
[12] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[13] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[14] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[15] 蒋剑青, 罗敏华, 胡诗红, 柳志灏, . 断续节理产状对砂岩破坏特征影响的真三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3077-3092.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!