岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 3357-3371.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0284

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

节理剪切过程中两翼微凸体接触规律及剪应力 模型研究

刘国磊1,马秋峰1,崔嵛1,李公成1,田静2   

  1. 1. 山东理工大学 资源与环境工程学院,山东 淄博 255000;2. 山东煤炭技术学院 机械工程系,山东 淄博 255120
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-10 修回日期:2022-05-30 出版日期:2022-12-28 发布日期:2023-01-02
  • 通讯作者: 马秋峰,男,1990年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩石力学与煤岩动力灾害方向的研究。E-mail: maqiufeng666@sina.com E-mail: liuguolei2003@163.com
  • 作者简介:刘国磊,男,1985年生,博士,副教授,主要从事冲击地压灾害与防治方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(No.51904178);山东省自然科学基金博士基金项目(No.ZR2018BEE009)

Contact law of two wing asperities in the process of joint shear and shear stress model

LIU Guo-lei1, MA Qiu-feng1, CUI Yu1, LI Gong-cheng1, TIAN Jing2   

  1. 1. School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, Shandong 255000, China; 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong Coal Technology College, Zibo, Shandong 255120, China
  • Received:2022-03-10 Revised:2022-05-30 Online:2022-12-28 Published:2023-01-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Young Scholars of National Natural Science Foundation of China(51904178) and the Shandong Natural Science Foundation PhD Program (ZR2018BEE009).

摘要: 为了探究节理剪切过程中微凸体接触规律,对张拉型节理面进行了三维扫描与直剪试验。通过三维点云追踪技术对节理面剪切过程中微凸体接触面积和接触角度进行了统计分析,基于微凸体接触规律建立了剪应力模型。在此过程中,得到如下结论:(1)剪切过程中,随着剪切位移的增大,接触面积逐渐减小,接触点由散落式分布转化为集中式分布,单个接触点面积逐渐增大,接触点数量逐渐减少,法向应力对接触面积影响显著,法向应力越大,接触面积越大。(2)在剪应力峰值前,上部岩块中大多数相互接触的微凸体处于“爬坡”状态,在剪应力峰值以后出现部分接触微凸体处于“背离”状态。剪应力峰值以前绝大多数接触的微凸体能够提供阻抗剪切的力,而在峰后存在部分微凸体无法提供阻抗剪切的力。(3)接触角近似呈现正态分布,随着剪切位移的增大,接触角的平均值呈现先增大后减小的规律。(4)对模型进行验证,结果表明,模型不仅能够描述不同法向应力条件下节理面的抗剪强度,而且能够反映剪应力−剪切位移的关系,证明了模型的合理性,为准确预测节理面抗剪强度提供了一种新的计算方法。

关键词: 节理, 剪切, 接触, 三维扫描, 本构模型

Abstract: In order to explore the contact law of asperities in the joint during shearing process, three-dimensional scanning and direct shear tests were carried out on the tensile joint surface. The contact area and contact angle of asperities in the joint surface shearing process were analyzed by 3D point cloud tracking technology, and a shear stress model was established based on the contact law of asperities. In this process, the following conclusions were obtained: 1) In the shear process, with the increase of shear displacement, the contact area gradually decreases, and the contact points change from scattered distribution to centralized distribution. The area of a single contact point gradually increases, and the number of contact points gradually decreases. Normal stress has a significant impact on the contact area. The larger the normal stress, the larger the contact area. 2) Before the peak value of shear stress, most of the contacting asperities in the upper rock block are in a “climbing” state, and after the peak value of shear stress, some contacting asperities are in a “deviating” state. Before the peak of shear stress, most of the asperities contacted can provide shear resistance, while after the peak, some asperities cannot provide shear resistance. 3) The contact angle approximately presents a normal distribution and the average contact angle first increases and then decreases with the increase of shear displacement. 4) The verification results of the model in this paper show that the model can not only describe the shear strength of joint surface under different normal stress conditions, but also reflect the relationship between shear stress and shear displacement, which proves the rationality of the model. The model in this paper provides a new calculation method for accurately predicting the shear strength of joint surface.

Key words: joint, shearing, contact, three dimensional scanning, constitutive model

中图分类号: TU452
[1] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[2] 王江锋, 吴涵兵, 赵顺利, 杜春雪, 张淼, . 考虑压密变形的某输水隧洞红砂岩加卸载力学演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 121-130.
[3] 杨烜宇, 王勇, . 考虑不同凸起体宽度的规则形态土−岩界面剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 195-204.
[4] 侯克鹏, 江帆, 张超, 龚晶汉, . 土石混合体−基岩接触面剪切的基覆面形态效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 271-284.
[5] 刘静, 王昊, 杨鑫, 苏进臣, 张友良, . 微生物诱导碳酸钙沉淀加固热带土质边坡现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 343-353.
[6] 屈俊童, 时启壮, 郭颖杰, 张 翔, 刘 熠, 蒋德阳. 冻融循环作用下冰碛土力学特性及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2859-2872.
[7] 沈扬, 沈嘉毅, 梁晖, 樊科伟. 基于3D打印技术的仿真钙质砂三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[8] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 刘欣宇, 李亚博. 含水率和剪切速率对黏性滑带土剪切行为及损伤演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2471-2482.
[9] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[10] 吕萌, 王亮清, 谢妮, 朱林锋, 安彩龙, 柯睿, 王旭晨, . 加锚异性结构面剪切特性及声发射响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2106-2120.
[11] 芮瑞, LIN A H, 杨俊超, 杨硕, . 被动活动门试验中的土拱效应演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1657-1666.
[12] 许明, 袁帮国, 蔡宇, 刘先珊, 甘峰帆, 袁东豪, . 应力波扰动下岩石节理端部应力集中特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1687-1699.
[13] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[14] 刘杰, 钟伦伟, 钟振, 张宪尚, 隆清明, 应鹏, . 恒定法向刚度边界条件下受剪岩石裂隙非线性渗流特性的数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1919-1933.
[15] 李林, 张等红, 张淼, 顾晓强, 徐龙飞, . 考虑水-力耦合的桩-非饱和黄土接触面荷载传递模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1343-1355.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!