岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 909-917.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1186

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于块体剪流组合机构的黏土基坑抗隆起 稳定性分析

谭廷震1, 2,黄茂松1, 2,刘奕晖1, 2,王浩然3,张中杰3   

  1. 1. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092; 3. 上海市城市建设设计研究总院(集团)有限公司,上海 200125
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-02 修回日期:2021-09-02 出版日期:2022-04-15 发布日期:2022-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 黄茂松,男,1965年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: mshuang@tongji.edu.cn E-mail: 1910279@tongji.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:谭廷震,男,1997年生,博士研究生,主要从事极限分析上限法在岩土工程中的应用研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重点项目(No. 51738010);国家重点研发计划项目(No. 2016YFC0800200)。

Analysis of basal heave stability of braced excavations in clay based on combined mechanisms of rigid blocks and continuous velocity field

TAN Ting-zhen1, 2, HUANG Mao-song1, 2, LIU Yi-hui1, 2, WANG Hao-ran3, ZHANG Zhong-jie3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Shanghai Urban Construction Design and Research Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200125, China
  • Received:2021-08-02 Revised:2021-09-02 Online:2022-04-15 Published:2022-04-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51738010) and the National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFC0800200).

摘要: 现行规范中基坑抗隆起稳定性计算方法主要为基于极限平衡理论的圆弧滑动法,这种方法没有严格的理论基础,得到的安全系数普遍偏高,且当挡墙插入比较小时,安全系数明显不合理。极限分析法拥有严格的理论基础,已经建立了一些基坑抗隆起稳定分析上限机构,但是这些机构的适用性缺乏一定的研究。针对上述问题,首先介绍了基坑抗隆起稳定上限分析的理论框架,对机构优化概念与块体剪流组合机构的构造做了比较全面的探讨;随后在均质地基下利用弹塑性有限元的模拟结果进行了讨论,并在非均质地基条件下利用圆弧滑动法的计算结果进行了讨论;最后总结了不同块体剪流组合上限机构的适用条件。分析表明,挡墙刚度较大且插入比较小时,应该将挡墙刚度按无穷大处理;挡墙刚度较小且插入比较大时,应该考虑挡墙刚度的影响。通过工程案例分析,验证了提出的圆弧机构上限法的合理性。

关键词: 基坑, 极限分析法, 抗隆起稳定, 挡墙刚度, 圆弧滑动法

Abstract: In existing norms, the method for basal heave stability analysis of excavations is mainly the circular sliding method. This method bases on the limit equilibrium theory and has no rigorous theoretical basis. The safety factors derived by the circular sliding method are generally overestimated, and the derived safety factors are highly deviant when the wall embedment depth ratios are relatively small. The limit analysis method has a rigorous theoretical basis, based on which some failure mechanisms have already been proposed. However, there is a lack of research on the applicability of these mechanisms. In this study, the theoretical framework of the upper bound analysis for basal heave stability analysis is introduced, and the concept of mechanism optimization as well as the combined mechanism of rigid blocks and continuous velocity field are discussed comprehensively. The upper bound mechanisms are compared with the elastoplastic finite element method in uniform clay ground and the circular sliding method in non-uniform clay ground respectively. The applicable conditions of these mechanisms are concluded. The results show that the stiffness of the wall should be treated as infinity when the stiffness is large and the embedded depth ratio is relatively small, while the influence of the stiffness should be considered when the stiffness is small and the embedded depth ratio is relatively large. The proposed circular upper bound mechanism is verified by a field case study.

Key words: braced excavation, limit analysis method, basal heave stability, wall stiffness, circular sliding method

中图分类号: TU 442
[1] 金国龙, 李鸿桥, 谢雄耀, . 圆形地连墙分载法受力计算理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 81-91.
[2] 赖丰文, 刘松玉, 蔡国军, 鲁泰山, 李洪江, 段伟, . 基于孔压静力触探原位测试的基坑围护结构变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2650-2660.
[3] 黄明华, 钟煜轩, 陆锦斌, 王克平. 基于非连续地基梁模型的基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[4] 任连伟, 王书彪, 孔纲强, 杨权威, 邓岳保. 综合管廊始发井能源支护桩热力响应现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 573-581.
[5] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[6] 张振波, 李秉欣, 杨茜, 刘志春, 刘义, . 近接基坑工程有限土体失稳模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 266-277.
[7] 李涛, 舒佳军, 王彦龙, 陈前. 基于模态分解方法的深基坑支护桩水平变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 496-506.
[8] 魏星, 陈睿, 程世涛, 朱明, 王子健, . 成都膨胀土地区深基坑降雨稳定性分析与变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 525-534.
[9] 易顺, 陈健, 潘家军, 王艳丽, 徐晗, 刘春鹏, . 内撑式基坑围护结构水平变形的表征函数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 568-578.
[10] 肖荣军, 马威, 李锋, 袁丽云. 一种深基坑排桩支护结构内力位移矩阵分析法 解答及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 579-595.
[11] 薛秀丽, 谢伟睿, 廖欢, 曾超峰, 陈宏波, 徐长节, 韩磊, . 邻近深埋地铁车站水−土阻隔效应及其对基坑抽水致沉的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
[12] 薛秀丽, 刘治珩, 曾超峰, 白 宁, 陈宏波. 开挖前抽水条件下基坑围挡两侧非极限土压力计算模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1699-1708.
[13] 雷国平, 苏栋, 程马遥, 刘慧芬, 张维, . 基于被动区土弹簧刚度降低过程的基坑围护结构计算增量法及软化p-y 曲线[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 797-808.
[14] THENDAR Yoshua, LIM Aswin. 考虑地下连续墙接缝的深基坑RFD系统研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3717-3727.
[15] 张治国, 毛敏东, 王卫东, PAN Y T, 吴钟腾, . 降雨影响下基坑开挖施工对邻近基桩变形响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 27-49.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!