岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9): 2391-2398.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0637

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

三轴应力下水对泥质砂岩力学特性 影响的试验研究

周辉1, 2,宋明1, 2,张传庆1, 2,杨凡杰1, 2,路新景3,房后国3,邓伟杰3   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点试验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049;3. 黄河勘测规划设计有限公司,河南 郑州 450003
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-16 修回日期:2022-05-27 出版日期:2022-09-12 发布日期:2022-09-12
  • 作者简介:周辉,男,1972年生,博士,研究员,主要从事岩石力学试验、理论、数值分析与工程安全性分析方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划资助(No.2019YFC0605103,No.2019YFC0605104);国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(973计划)(No.2014CB046902)。

Experimental study of influences of water on mechanical behaviors of argillaceous sandstone under tri-axial compression

ZHOU Hui1, 2, SONG Ming1, 2, ZHANG Chuan-qing1, 2, YANG Fan-jie1, 2, LU Xin-jing3, FANG Hou-guo3, DENG Wei-jie3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, China
  • Received:2018-04-16 Revised:2022-05-27 Online:2022-09-12 Published:2022-09-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(2019YFC0605103, 2019YFC0605104) and the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2014CB046902).

摘要: 复杂应力状态下泥质砂岩遇水软化,严重降低围岩承载力,导致围岩破坏范围和变形压力增大,严重威胁输水隧洞运行期安全。为此,以兰州水源地输水隧洞泥质砂岩为研究对象,开展了不同浸润时间下的三轴压缩试验研究。试验结果表明,随着浸润时间的延长,泥质砂岩岩样峰值强度和残余强度对围压的敏感程度逐渐降低,水在一定程度上降低了峰值强度和残余强度对围压的敏感程度;浸润前期,残余强度随浸润时间的降低速率明显小于峰值强度随浸润时间的降低速率,水对泥质砂岩岩样峰值强度的软化作用较为明显;泥质砂岩岩样的峰值强度、残余强度和弹性模量均随浸润时间的增长呈负指数关系减小;随着围压的升高,浸润时间对弹性模量的影响程度逐渐减弱,围压升高在一定程度上降低了水对泥质砂岩岩样弹性模量的软化作用。

关键词: 泥质砂岩, 水, 三轴压缩试验, 力学特性

Abstract: The water softening of argillaceous sandstone in complex stress state will seriously reduce the bearing capacity of surrounding rock, resulting in the increase of failure range and deformation pressure of surrounding rock, and finally seriously threaten the safety of water tunnel during operation. To solve this problem, triaxial tests under different immersion time are carried out to investigate by using argillaceous sandstone from water delivery tunnel of Lanzhou water source project. The results are as follows. As the immersion time prolongs, the sensitivity of peak strength and residual strength to confining pressure decreases gradually. This may be attributed to the fact that the water reduces the sensitivity of peak strength and residual strength to confining pressure to a certain extent. In the early stage of immersion, the decreasing rate of residual strength with immersion time is significantly less than that of peak strength with immersion time, and the softening effect of water on the peak strength of argillaceous sandstone is more remarkable. The peak strength, residual strength and elastic modulus of argillaceous sandstone samples decrease with the increase of immersion time in a negative exponential relationship. With the increase of confining pressure, the influence of immersion time on elastic modulus gradually weakens, and the increase of confining pressure reduces the softening effect of water on the elastic modulus of argillaceous sandstone to a certain extent.

Key words: argillaceous sandstone, water, triaxial compression test, mechanical behaviors

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 冯德銮, 余洋, 梁仕华. 碱激发地聚物固化滨海软土的强度和水稳定性研究进展与评述[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 13-39.
[2] 王勇, 顾凯, 张博, 姜霖, 施斌, . 基于分布式温度测试和重建的浅表土体含水率反演[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 531-540.
[3] 吴俊, 闵一凡, 征西遥, 韩晨, 牛富俊, 朱宝林, . 地质聚合物固化淤泥法制备再生细骨料的压缩变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 159-170.
[4] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[5] 张兴文, 曹净, 雷舒羽, 李育红, 程芸, 张柠锐, . 富里酸环境对含腐殖酸水泥土结构及渗透性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 249-261.
[6] 秦立科, 郭瑞琦, 赵皓辰, 甄刚, 王琦, . 环境蒸发条件下石质文物毛细水动态分布规律影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 354-365.
[7] 李培楠, 刘学, 戴泽余, 翟一欣, 张弛, 寇晓勇, 范杰, 甄亮, 王长虹, . 曲线顶管底幕法水下沉船打捞顶推力计算模型与施工扰动分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 403-418.
[8] 赵武胜, 周帅, 解佩瑶, 高厚, 秦长坤, 陈卫忠, . 考虑初衬−二衬界面效应下隧道地震易损性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 477-490.
[9] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[10] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[11] 王昕琪, 冯子军, 陈正男, 高祺, 阴伟涛, 靳佩桦, 李玉彬, . 超临界水作用下花岗岩裂隙渗流特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2847-2858.
[12] 屈俊童, 时启壮, 郭颖杰, 张 翔, 刘 熠, 蒋德阳. 冻融循环作用下冰碛土力学特性及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2859-2872.
[13] 王天亮, 范帅波, 高毅仁, 张飞, 寇晓康, . 单向冻结条件下路基双层土体层间水分迁移机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2873-2884.
[14] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[15] 李新明, 何永飞, 谈云志, 任克彬, 张先伟, 尹松, . 不同含水率下石灰−偏高岭土改良遗址土宏微观特性的冻融循环效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2894-2906.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!