岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S2): 563-574.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1606

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

砂土层中盾构掘进实测数据及数值模拟分析

骆冠勇1, 2,钟淼1, 2,曹洪1, 2,潘泓1, 2   

  1. 1. 华南理工大学 土木与交通学院,广东 广州 510640;2. 华南理工大学 亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室,广东 广州 510640
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-21 修回日期:2022-07-20 出版日期:2022-10-10 发布日期:2022-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 潘泓,男,1967年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: hpan@scut.edu.cn E-mail:luogy@scut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:骆冠勇,男,1979年生,副教授,主要从事岩土方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51978282);广东省自然科学基金项目(No.2020A1515010583);华南理工大学亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室开放研究项目(No.2022ZB21);广东省现代土木工程技术重点实验室(No.2021B1212040003)。

Measured data and numerical simulation analysis of shield tunneling in sand

LUO Guan-yong1, 2, ZHONG Miao1, 2, CAO Hong1, 2, PAN Hong1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China; 2. The State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China
  • Received:2021-09-21 Revised:2022-07-20 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978282), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2020A1515010583), the State Key Lab of Subtropical Building Science, South China University Of Technology (2022ZB21) and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Modern Civil Engineering Technology(2021B1212040003).

摘要: 相对于其他土层,盾构在富水砂层中掘进的风险更大,但目前盾构掘进引起砂层变形的机制并不清楚。依托广州某电力隧道项目,选取一典型富水砂性地层断面对盾构隧道施工引起的地层变形进行高频率、近距离的监测,得到以下几点认识可供类似的工程参考:(1)富水环境下,相对于均质砂层,隧道处于粉砂+粗砂地层组合更容易发生渗透破坏。此情况下,粉砂层在承受更大渗透力同时,又受粗砂层强烈补给供水,非常容易被侵蚀甚至掏空。(2)地层均匀损失与局部集中损失引起地层扰动规律有较大的不同。地层均匀损失时由于拱效应没集中局部损失的强,其扰动范围、地表沉降及水平位移均更大。水平位移最大值的位置与地层损失的非均匀化也密切相关。地层均匀损失时,隧道两边最大水平位移发生在隧道高程范围内;但地层非均匀损失(隧道顶部局部塌落)时,发生最大的水平位移的位置会明显上移。(3)渗透力的作用使得地层扰动范围扩大。(4)地层损失率受注浆影响严重,隧道附近大,地表最小,隧道上方土体呈松散化趋势。

关键词: 盾构施工, 地层变形, 砂层, 实测, 数值模拟

Abstract: Compared with other soil layers, the risk of shield tunneling in water-rich sand is greater, but the mechanism of sand deformation caused by shield tunneling is currently unclear. Relying on an electric power tunnel project in Guangzhou, this paper selects a typical water-rich sandy stratum section for high-frequency, close-range monitoring of stratum deformation caused by shield tunnel construction. The following understandings are obtained, which can be used as reference for similar projects. 1) In a water-rich environment, compared to in a homogeneous sand layer, in a combination of fine and coarse sands, the tunnel is more prone to seepage failure. Under this circumstance, the fine sand layer bears greater seepage force while being strongly supplied with water from the coarse sand layer, and the fine sand layer is thus very easy to be eroded or even hollowed out. 2) The ground deformation caused by uniform volume loss and local concentrated loss is quite different. In the case of uniform loss, because the arching effect is not as strong as the local loss, the disturbance range, surface settlement and horizontal displacement are all larger. The location of the maximum horizontal displacement is also closely related to the heterogeneity of the formation loss. When the formation loss is uniform, the maximum horizontal displacement on both sides of the tunnel occurs within the tunnel elevation range; but when the uneven loss (partial collapse of the tunnel top) occurs, the location of the maximum horizontal displacement will move up significantly. 3) The seepage force expands the range of stratum disturbance. 4) The stratum loss rate is severely affected by grouting. The vicinity of the tunnel is large, the ground surface is the smallest, and the soil above the tunnel tends to loosen.

Key words: shield construction, soil deformation, sand stratum, field monitor, numerical simulation

中图分类号: U455.43
[1] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[3] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[4] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[5] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[6] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[7] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[8] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[9] 许国庆, 黄高翔, 王协康, 罗登泽, 李洪涛, 姚强, . 新型弧形聚能爆破作用下的岩石破裂演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
[10] 王帅, 王豫徽, 王玲, 李佳祺, 赵梓皓, 庞凯旋, . 基于晶体模型的岩石孔隙结构与矿物组成对裂纹扩展影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[11] 杨立. 平板载荷试验数值分析及承载力判定标准研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[12] 雷华阳, 杨洋, 许英刚. 不同埋深条件下盾构施工扰动试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 1-12.
[13] 陕耀, 董雅丞, 张旭辉, 姚西平, . 双层地下连续墙土压力的现场实测研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 507-516.
[14] 薛秀丽, 谢伟睿, 廖欢, 曾超峰, 陈宏波, 徐长节, 韩磊, . 邻近深埋地铁车站水−土阻隔效应及其对基坑抽水致沉的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
[15] 吕茂淋, 朱珍德, 周露明, 葛鑫梁, . 基于相场法的预制双裂隙岩体水力压裂扩展数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1850-1862.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!