岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 3318-3326.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0932

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

软土修正剑桥模型参数反演及其应用研究

虞洪1,陈晓斌1, 2,易利琴1,邱俊1,顾正浩3,赵辉4   

  1. 1. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410082;2. 重载铁路工程结构教育部重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410075; 3. 湖州南太湖市政建设有限公司,浙江 湖州 313000;4. 中交上海航道局有限公司,上海 200002
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-27 接受日期:2023-10-08 出版日期:2023-11-28 发布日期:2023-11-29
  • 通讯作者: 陈晓斌,男,1978年生,博士,教授,主要从事交通岩土工程领域的教学研究工作。E-mail: chen_xiaobin@csu.edu.cn E-mail:1938234292@qq.com
  • 作者简介:虞洪,男,1998年生,硕士研究生,研究方向为基坑工程。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51978674)

Parameter inversion and application of soft soil modified Cambridge model

YU Hong1, CHEN Xiao-bin1, 2, YI Li-qin1, QIU Jun1, GU Zheng-hao3, ZHAO Hui4   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China; 2.Key MOE Laboratory of Heavy Haul Railway Engineering, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 3. Huzhou South the Taihu Lake Municipal Construction Co., Ltd. Huzhou, Zhejiang 313000, China; 4. China Communications Shanghai Waterway Bureau Co., Ltd. Shanghai 200002, China
  • Received:2023-06-27 Accepted:2023-10-08 Online:2023-11-28 Published:2023-11-29
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978674).

摘要: 土体本构参数的合理取值是数值模拟的重要前提。为准确获取湖州软土修正剑桥模型参数,针对该地区两种典型软土,提出了基于室内试验-神经网络的软土修正剑桥模型参数反演方法。首先,开展了室内三轴固结不排水试验及标准固结-回弹试验,基于室内试验结果确定了湖州地区典型软土修正剑桥模型参数反演区间;其次,基于正交试验设计原理,对基坑开挖过程中不同参数水平下维护结构侧移进行数值计算,根据数值计算结果构造出64组PSO-BP神经网络训练样本;最后,利用构造的训练集对湖州地区软土修正剑桥模型参数进行反演。研究结果表明:反演得到的两种典型软土修正剑桥模型参数临界状态有效应力比M1、M2,压缩参数λ1λ2,回弹参数κ1κ2及孔隙比e1、e2分别为M1=1.076、λ=0.050、κ=0.021、e1=1.712,M2=1.123、λ2=0.038、κ2=0.012,e2=0.967;通过反演参数计算得到的维护结构变形预测值与实测值吻合度较高,其相对误差不超过5%;基于反演参数通过有限元数值计算对基坑变形预测,预测结果验证了反演方法的准确性。针对软土修正剑桥模型参数反演,分析了神经网络训练样本数、输入层节点数对反演结果的影响。研究成果可以为湖州地区类似的基坑工程提供参数支持和技术指导。

关键词: 软土, 修正剑桥模型, 室内试验, PSO-BP神经网络, 参数反演

Abstract: The reasonable value of soil constitutive parameters is an important prerequisite for numerical simulation. In order to accurately obtain the parameters of the modified Cambridge model for Huzhou soft soil, a parameter inversion method for the modified Cambridge model based on laboratory experiments and neural networks was developed for two typical soft soils in the region. Firstly, laboratory triaxial consolidation undrained tests and standard consolidation rebound tests were conducted, and based on the test results, the parameter inversion interval of the modified Cambridge model for typical soft soil in Huzhou region was determined. Secondly, based on the principle of orthogonal experimental design, numerical calculations were conducted on the lateral displacement of the retaining structure at different parameter levels during the excavation process of the foundation pit. Based on the numerical calculation results, 64 sets of PSO-BP neural network training samples were constructed. Finally, the constructed training set was used to invert the parameters of the modified Cambridge model for soft soils in Huzhou area. The critical state effective stress ratio (M1, M2), compression parameter (λ1λ2), rebound parameter (κ1κ2), and void ratio (e1、e2) of the two typical soft soil modified Cambridge model parameters obtained through inversion were M1=1.076、λ=0.050、κ=0.021、e1=1.712,M2=1.123、λ2=0.038、κ2=0.012,e2=0.967. The predicted deformation values of the retaining structure calculated through inversion parameters were in good agreement with the measured values, with a relative error of no more than 5%. Based on the inversion parameters, finite element numerical calculation was used to predict the deformation of the foundation pit, and the prediction results verified the accuracy of the inversion method. The influence of the number of neural network training samples and the number of input layer nodes on the inversion results of the Cambridge model parameters for soft soil correction was analyzed. The research results can provide parameter support and technical guidance for similar foundation pit projects in Huzhou area.

Key words: machine learning, artificial intelligence, geotechnical engineering, forecast, algorithm

中图分类号: TU 447
[1] 冯德銮, 余洋, 梁仕华. 碱激发地聚物固化滨海软土的强度和水稳定性研究进展与评述[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 13-39.
[2] 童佳荣, 张曙, 李荣, 夏彬桐, 王宁伟, . 电动化学加固技术对珠海软土改性的机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 262-270.
[3] 周雄雄, 黄佳铄, 李若婷, 张建余, . 堆石料湿化变形的修正剑桥模型及其参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2703-2710.
[4] 杨少朋, 杨爱武, 许福军, . 改性纤维排水板真空预压加固吹填软土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 789-797.
[5] 蒋新彧, 征西遥, 吴俊, 杨爱武, 李博, . HNO3和H2SO4侵蚀作用下地质聚合物固化软土的抗酸性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 851-866.
[6] 郭焕明, 张虎, 丑亚玲, 郑波, 胡金涛, 韩善博, . 径向冻融过程中软黏土水热力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 905-915.
[7] 王彪, 陈星欣, 尹清锋, 郭力群, 何明高, . 软土地层盾构地中对接法孔压扰动规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 535-549.
[8] 李晓龙, 赵泽鑫, 陈坤洋, 马鹏, 陈灿, 钟燕辉, 张蓓, . 考虑化学反应的高聚物压密劈裂注浆仿真研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2823-2838.
[9] 芮瑞, 田子衿, 杨海青, 黄腾, 蒙庆辉, 王金元, . 温度效应影响下的海相软土静力学特性试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1112-1120.
[10] 崔金虎, 王路君, 叶智刚, 燕秉法, 黄家晟, 朱斌, . 循环温度荷载下高温管道-软土地基相互作用模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3286-3294.
[11] 崔溦, 裴介渲, 江志安, . 动水作用下岩体裂隙中颗粒运动规律的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2870-2878.
[12] 李林, 左林龙, 胡涛涛, 宋博恺, . 基于孔压静力触探试验测试数据的原位固结系数物理信息神经网络反演方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2889-2899.
[13] 张聪, 冯忠居, 林路宇, 周桂梅, 陈露, . 震陷场地变截面单桩动力特性与损伤评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3037-3046.
[14] 应宏伟, 闫旭政, 周建, 龚晓南, 王阳扬, 韩华超, 侯靖. 堤坝软土碎石桩复合地基计算参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 669-677.
[15] 赵津桥, 丁选明, 刘汉龙, 欧强, 蒋春勇, . 珊瑚砂振冲密实加固响应室内模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2327-2336.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!