岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (12): 3629-3638.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1968

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

倾斜液化场地−桩基−结构体系在近场脉冲与非脉冲地震动下地震响应差异分析

张正哲,贾科敏,许成顺,潘汝江   

  1. 北京工业大学 城市与工程安全减灾教育部重点实验室,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-17 接受日期:2023-03-02 出版日期:2023-12-20 发布日期:2023-12-21
  • 通讯作者: 许成顺,女,1977年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土动力学与岩土地震工程领域的研究。E-mail: xuchengshun@bjut.edu.cn E-mail:Zhangzhengzhe@bjut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张正哲,女,1999年生,硕士研究生,主要从事液化场地桩基础抗震领域的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金杰出青年基金(No.52225807)

Difference analysis of seismic responses of inclined liquefaction site-pile-structure system under near-field pulsed and non-pulsed ground motions

ZHANG Zheng-zhe, JIA Ke-min, XU Cheng-shun, PAN Ru-jiang   

  1. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2022-12-17 Accepted:2023-03-02 Online:2023-12-20 Published:2023-12-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China for Distinguished Young Scholars(No.52225807)。

摘要: 对比研究了倾斜液化场地−桩基−结构体系在近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下的响应。首先基于OpenSees有限元平台建立了倾斜液化场地−桩基−结构体系的有限元模型,与大型振动台试验结果进行对比,验证了数值模型的可靠性。在此基础上,建立典型倾斜液化场地−桩基−结构体系的有限元模型,对比分析近场脉冲与非脉冲地震作用下体系的地震响应规律,并开展地震动强度指标与地震响应之间的相关性分析。结果表明:与非脉冲地震动相比,近场脉冲地震动作用下,场地残余位移明显增加,在松砂层顶部最为明显,约增大40%;桩身弯矩和桩身残余位移显著增加,尤其是桩顶位置处;非脉冲地震动下地震动强度指标与各响应之间的相关性高于脉冲地震动作用,选取3个相关性较好的强度参数:峰值速度/峰值加速度(PGV/PGA)、阿里亚斯强度AI、平均周期Tm,可在一定程度上表征地震动对液化场地−桩基−结构体系破坏反应的影响。

关键词: 脉冲地震动, 倾斜液化场地, 桩基础, 数值模拟, 地震响应, 地震动参数, 相关性分析

Abstract: In this paper, the seismic responses of inclined liquefaction site-pile-structure system under near-field pulsed and non-pulsed ground motion were studied. Firstly, a finite element model of inclined liquefaction site-pile-structure system was established based on the finite element platform OpenSees, and the reliability of the numerical model was verified by comparing with the results of large-scale shaking table test. On this basis, the finite element model of typical inclined liquefaction site-pile-structure system was established, the seismic response laws of the system under near-field pulsed and non-pulsed ground motion were compared and analyzed, and the correlation analysis between ground motion intensity index and seismic response was carried out. The results show that compared with the non-pulsed ground motion, the residual displacement of the site increases obviously under the near-field pulsed ground motion, especially at the top of the loose sand layer, which increases by about 40%. Pile bending moment and pile residual displacement increase significantly, especially at the pile top. The correlation between the ground motion intensity index and the response under non-pulsed ground motion is higher than that under pulsed ground motion. Three strength parameters with good correlation, i.e. PGV/PGA (peak ground velocity/ peak ground acceleration), AI (Arias intensity) and Tm(mean period), can indicate the influence of ground motion on the failure response of liquefaction site-pile-structure system to a certain extent.

Key words: pulse ground motion, inclined liquefaction site, pile foundation, numerical simulation, seismic response, ground motion parameters, correlation analysis

中图分类号: TU473
[1] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[3] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[4] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[5] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 杨景泉, 郑长杰, 丁选明, . 竖向入射P波激励下饱和土中管桩地震响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[8] 杨明辉, 蔡明辉, 陈波, 杨汉, . 考虑波致海床动态响应的单桩水平阻抗计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1563-1572.
[9] 冯世进, 陈佳卓, 高梦雯, 张晓磊, 吴强, 肖钰, . 软土地区在产企业污染监测及预警方法研究:基于时移高密度电法的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1323-1334.
[10] 周光远, 干飞, 郑刚, 周海祚, 王宏, 毕靖, 刘彪, 张元胤, . 基于土体变形的端承桩负摩阻力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[11] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[12] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[13] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[14] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[15] 许国庆, 黄高翔, 王协康, 罗登泽, 李洪涛, 姚强, . 新型弧形聚能爆破作用下的岩石破裂演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!