岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 1001-1008.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0755

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

砂土海床中海底管道贯入阻力演化特征及细观机制研究

杨阳1, 2,田英辉3,张春会4,王荣1, 2,王智超5,王乐1, 2   

  1. 1. 天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300350;2. 天津大学 水利工程仿真与安全国家重点实验室,天津 300350;3. 墨尔本大学 工程学院, 澳大利亚 维多利亚 3010;4. 河北科技大学 建筑工程学院,河北 石家庄 050018;5. 湘潭大学 土木工程学院,湖南 湘潭 411105
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-20 接受日期:2022-08-09 出版日期:2023-04-18 发布日期:2023-04-28
  • 作者简介:杨阳,男,1995年生,博士研究生,主要从事海洋岩土工程方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51890913,No.51879183)

Penetration resistance evolution characteristics and mesoscopic mechanism of submarine pipeline in sandy seabed

YANG Yang1, 2, TIAN Ying-hui3, ZHANG Chun-hui4, WANG Rong1, 2, WANG Zhi-chao5, WANG Le1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 3. School of Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia; 4. School of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050018, China; 5. School of Civil Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, Hunan 411105, China
  • Received:2022-05-20 Accepted:2022-08-09 Online:2023-04-18 Published:2023-04-28
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51890913, 51879183).

摘要: 理解海底管道竖向贯入过程是科学评估管道安装期间初始埋深及服役期间安全性和稳定性分析的关键。通过土工离心机模型试验,结合离散元数值分析研究了真实应力水平下不同密实度砂土中海底管道竖向贯入阻力演化特征及细观机制。研究结果显示,对于中密砂,管道贯入阻力曲线主要表现为硬化特征;对于密砂,贯入阻力曲线整体上呈现周期性软化特征,且埋深越大,软化程度越大。离散元计算分析表明,造成该现象的原因是不同密实度砂土中管道贯入的土体流动及破坏机制不同,且贯入阻力的演化与剪切带的形成与发展密切相关。利用现行海底管道设计规范评估密砂中管道埋深时应充分考虑其贯入阻力随深度的演化特征,当管道埋深初步评估大于0.1D(D为管径)时,应结合计算结果上下限值合理预测管道埋深。

关键词: 砂土海床, 海底管道, 贯入阻力, 埋深, 离散元法

Abstract: Understanding the vertical penetration process of submarine pipelines is of fundamental significance for the reasonable assessment of the initial pipeline embedment during installation and safety and stability during service. Geotechnical centrifuge model tests, combined with discrete element method modelling were conducted to investigate penetration resistance evolution characteristics and mesoscopic mechanism of submarine pipeline in sand with different densities under the real stress level. The test results show that for the medium-dense sand, the pipe penetration resistance-embedment curve shows a hardening trend. On the other hand, for the dense sand, the pipe penetration resistance-embedment curve exhibits a periodic softening trend; moreover, the deeper the embedment is, the greater the degree of softening becomes. Discrete element modelling results demonstrate that the difference in pipe penetration resistance-embedment curves is induced by different soil movement and failure modes when pipe penetrates in sands with different densities. The pipe penetration resistance evolution characteristics are closely related to the formation and development of shear band in sand. The evolution characteristics of penetration resistance with embedment should be fully considered when evaluating pipe embedment in dense sands using the current design specification for submarine pipelines. More specifically, the pipe embedment should be reasonably estimated based on the upper and lower limits of calculation results, when the preliminarily estimated pipe embedment is larger than one tenth of the pipe diameter.

Key words: sandy seabed, submarine pipeline, penetration resistance, embedment, discrete element method

中图分类号: TU43
[1] 马滨, 王丽艳, 吉文炜, 吴晗, 蔡晓光, 王炳辉, . 强震下返包胎面加筋挡土墙结构抗震性能模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2792-2804.
[2] 孙闯, 蒲云波, 敖云鹤, 陶琦, . 冻融饱水裂隙砂岩力学特性及细观破裂演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2339-2352.
[3] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[4] 姚嘉楠, 徐长节, 迟民良, 王艳萍, 习跃来, 王伟锋, 冯国辉, 孙佳政, . RBT模式下刚性挡墙非极限主动土压力的离散元模拟及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 640-652.
[5] 娄旭龙, 张泽瑞, 孔德琼, 陈星潮, 朱斌, . 深海重型管道管土相互作用大变形极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3234-3242.
[6] 王军, 张凯宇, 陈晟凯, 秦伟, 倪俊峰, 高紫阳, 张一帆, . 爆破挤淤法中炸药埋深对土体参数影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 123-132.
[7] 雷华阳, 杨洋, 许英刚. 不同埋深条件下盾构施工扰动试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 1-12.
[8] 张会豪, 邱子源, 金伟, 张丹, 罗玉龙, . 反滤压重及埋深对深厚覆盖层允许坡降影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 769-776.
[9] 杨阳, 王乐, 马建华, 童晨曦, 张春会, 王智超, 田英辉, . 考虑颗粒破碎影响的钙质砂中海底管道贯入机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 623-632.
[10] 金磊, 叶阳, 王宇, 李晶晶, . 抗转动对散粒介质三轴剪切力学行为的影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3779-3790.
[11] 骆祚森, 朱作祥, 苏卿, 李建林, 邓华锋, 杨超, . 基于平行黏结模型的水-岩作用下砂岩蠕变模拟及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2445-2457.
[12] 杜炜, 聂如松, 李列列, 谭永长, 张杰, 祁延录, . 考虑不同边界条件的风积沙−土工格栅拉拔试验离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1849-1862.
[13] 王思远, 蒋明镜, 李承超, 张旭东, . 三轴剪切条件下胶结型深海能源土应变局部化离散元模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3307-3317.
[14] 杨磊, 涂冬媚, 朱启银, 吴则祥, 余闯, . 考虑变温幅值影响的颗粒循环热 固结离散元法试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 591-600.
[15] 申浩翰, 张海, 范俊锴, 徐瑞阳, 张小明. 离散单元法软件EDEM中接触半径对岩石 力学特性的影响及其应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 580-590.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!