岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1604-1614.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1131

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

斜坡上嵌岩抗拔桩竖向承载变形特性模型试验及数值模拟

季雨坤1，王钦科2，赵国良2，张健3，马建林4   

  1. 1. 中国矿业大学 深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室，江苏 徐州 221116；2. 西南科技大学 土木工程与建筑学院，四川 绵阳 621010； 3. 四川电力设计咨询有限责任公司，四川 成都 610041；4. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院，四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-19 接受日期:2022-10-14 出版日期:2023-06-14 发布日期:2023-06-14
  • 通讯作者: 王钦科，男，1990年生，博士，讲师，主要从事桩基工程方面的研究。E-mail: qkwang_90@163.com E-mail: jykcumt@163.com
  • 作者简介:季雨坤，男，1991年生，博士，副研究员，主要从事岩土工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划（No.2016YFC0802203）；四川省科技计划（No.2023NSFSC0881）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（No.2022QN1038）；江苏省基础研究计划项目（No.BK20221135）

Model test and numerical simulation of vertical bearing capacity and deformation characteristics of rock-socketed uplift pile in sloped ground

JI Yu-kun1, WANG Qin-ke2, ZHAO Guo-liang2, ZHANG Jian3, MA Jian-lin4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, Sichuan 621010, China; 3. POWERCHINA Sichuan Electric Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2022-07-19 Accepted:2022-10-14 Online:2023-06-14 Published:2023-06-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0802203), the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2023NSFSC0881), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2022QN1038) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20221135).

PDF (Chinese)

373

摘要： 随着我国输电线路工程逐步进入西部山区，越来越多的输电塔基础需要修建在陡峭的山坡上。然而，斜坡桩基在强风、雪等极端气候的抗拔承载变形特性研究不足，现行规范也尚无完善说明。基于此，开展了平地与斜坡上嵌岩抗拔桩的室内模型试验，对比分析了荷载−位移曲线、地面变形及裂缝扩展、破坏模式、桩身轴力、桩侧摩阻力及桩−岩相对位移。使用试验结果与ABAQUS数值模拟结果相比较，在验证模型可靠性的基础上，进一步研究了斜坡坡度对嵌岩抗拔桩承载变形特性的影响。结果表明，平地与斜坡下的荷载−位移曲线变化规律一致，均呈陡变型。斜坡对嵌岩抗拔桩的承载变形特性具有不利影响，当斜坡坡度在0º～30º范围内变化时，斜坡坡度对极限承载力的削弱影响呈近似线性增加（0%～12.8%）。随着斜坡坡度增加到45º时，斜坡对嵌岩抗拔桩极限承载力的削弱影响急剧凸显（25.9%）。斜坡上的基岩破坏面主要发生在下坡3.2d（d为桩径）、角度为120º的扇形范围内，逆坡破坏范围约为1d，不同于平地呈对称、复合形的破坏。值得注意的是，当桩顶荷载达到约80%的极限承载力时，平地地表或斜坡下坡出现了可见的裂缝。该研究成果为斜坡上输电塔桩基抗拔优化设计及规范完善提供了科学依据。

关键词: 斜坡, 嵌岩抗拔桩, 承载变形特性, 室内模型试验, 数值模拟

Abstract: As transmission line projects continue to expand into the western mountainous regions of China, the need for more transmission tower foundations on steep hillsides has increased. However, research on the uplift bearing deformation characteristics of pile foundations under high-intensity wind and snow scenarios on sloped ground is lacking, and current specifications are insufficient. Therefore, laboratory model tests were conducted on rock-socketed uplift piles on both flat and sloped ground to investigate load-displacement curves, ground deformation and crack propagation, failure mode, axial force of pile, side friction of pile, and relative displacement between the pile and rock. ABAQUS numerical simulation results were compared to the model test results to validate the reliability of the numerical model and investigate the influence of steepness (slope angle) on the bearing capacity and deformation characteristics of rock-socketed uplift piles. The results demonstrate that the load-displacement curves for flat and sloped ground have similar steep shapes, and sloped ground can have an adverse impact on the bearing capacity and deformation characteristics of rock-socketed uplift piles. The decrease in pile bearing capacity is positively correlated to the steepness of the slope, with a decrease of 0%–12.8% for slopes of 0º–30º and up to 25.9% for a slope of 45º. Bedrock failure surfaces mainly occur in the downhill slope within a range of 3.2d(d is pile diameter), as well as within a fan-shaped range of 120º, while the failure range on adverse slopes is about 1d, which is different from symmetrical and composite failure on flat ground. When the load on the top of the pile reaches approximately 80% of its ultimate bearing capacity, visible cracks can be observed in flat or downhill areas of sloped ground. These research findings offer a scientific basis for improving the design and specifications of uplift resistance capacity in transmission tower foundations on sloped ground.

Key words: slope, rock-socketed uplift pile, bearing capacity and deformation characteristics, laboratory model test, numerical simulation

中图分类号: TU473.1
[1] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[3] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[6] 可文海, 杨文海, 李源, 吴磊, . SH波作用下斜坡地形中桩基的动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[7] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[8] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[9] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[10] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[11] 许国庆, 黄高翔, 王协康, 罗登泽, 李洪涛, 姚强, . 新型弧形聚能爆破作用下的岩石破裂演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
[12] 王帅, 王豫徽, 王玲, 李佳祺, 赵梓皓, 庞凯旋, . 基于晶体模型的岩石孔隙结构与矿物组成对裂纹扩展影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[13] 杨立. 平板载荷试验数值分析及承载力判定标准研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[14] 薛秀丽, 谢伟睿, 廖欢, 曾超峰, 陈宏波, 徐长节, 韩磊, . 邻近深埋地铁车站水−土阻隔效应及其对基坑抽水致沉的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
[15] 吕茂淋, 朱珍德, 周露明, 葛鑫梁, . 基于相场法的预制双裂隙岩体水力压裂扩展数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1850-1862.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发