岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8): 2458-2470.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1347

• 测试技术 • 上一篇    

基于频域反射的细粒土压实度检测方法与误差评估

冉宇玲1, 2,柏巍1,孔令伟1,李雪梅3,樊恒辉2,杨秀娟2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 2. 西北农林科技大学 水利与建筑工程学院,陕西 杨凌 712100;3. 浙江省水利河口研究院,浙江 杭州 310020
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-30 接受日期:2022-11-09 出版日期:2023-08-21 发布日期:2023-08-21
  • 通讯作者: 柏巍,男,1982年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事特殊土土力学、地基与基础工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: wbai@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:ranyl0113@163.com
  • 作者简介:冉宇玲,女,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事特殊土方面的相关研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 41772339,No. 41877281)

Test method and error evaluation for compaction degree of fine soils based on frequency domain reflectometry

RAN Yu-ling1, 2, BAI Wei1, KONG Ling-wei1, LI Xue-mei3, FAN Heng-hui2, YANG Xiu-juan2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China; 3. Zhejiang Institute of Hydraulics & Estuary, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310020, China
  • Received:2022-08-30 Accepted:2022-11-09 Online:2023-08-21 Published:2023-08-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (41772339, 41877281).

摘要: 压实度是道路、房建、水利等工程领域评价土体压实质量的重要参数,与土体含水率和电导率密切相关。而频域反射技术(frequency domain reflectometry,FDR)可用于快速测定土体含水率和电导率。首先利用频域反射技术分别对多种压实状态下红黏土、膨胀土和黄土的含水率、电导率进行测量;然后对含水率测值进行室内标定,得到3种土的含水率标定曲线;通过偏最小二乘回归分析方法(partial least squares regression,PLSR)建立了3种土体的压实度-含水率-电导率之间的经验关系,并与实测值进行了对比分析;再根据扫描电子显微镜(scanning electron microscopy,SEM)和压汞法(mercury intrusion porosimetry,MIP)试验结果分析了其微观机制;最后对拟合公式得到的压实度预测值进行随机试样验证,建立与实测值的误差评估体系,结果表明基于压实度-含水率-电导率之间的关系而提出的拟合公式预测压实度的精度较高。相关研究可为道路、房建、水利等工程中土体压实度的快速检测提供参考。

关键词: 压实度, 频域反射, 含水率, 电导率

Abstract: The compaction degree is an important parameter for evaluating the quality of soil compaction in many engineering constructions such as roads, housing construction, and water conservancy project, and it correlates with moisture content and electrical conductivity. Frequency domain reflectometry (FDR) can rapidly measure soil moisture content and electrical conductivity. Firstly, in this research, FDR was adopted to rapidly measure the values of soil moisture content and electrical conductivity regarding lateritic soil, expansive soil, and loess at varying compaction degrees. Secondly, the measured values of moisture content were calibrated in laboratory, and the calibration curves of the three soils were obtained accordingly. Thirdly, empirical relationships between compaction degree, moisture content and conductivity of the three soils were established using the partial least squares regression (PLSR) analysis method, and compared with the measured value. Fourthly, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) tests revealed its mechanism from microscopic aspect. Finally, the predicted value of the compaction degree obtained by the fitting equation was verified, and an error evaluation system was established. The results show that such fitting equations based on the relationship between compaction degree, moisture content, and electrical conductivity have a high prediction accuracy. Therefore, the results in this work can provide a good reference for the rapid detection of soil compaction in roads, housing construction, water conservancy and other projects.

Key words: compaction degree, frequency domain reflectometry, moisture content, electrical conductivity

中图分类号: TU 433
[1] 王勇, 顾凯, 张博, 姜霖, 施斌, . 基于分布式温度测试和重建的浅表土体含水率反演[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 531-540.
[2] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[3] 李新明, 何永飞, 谈云志, 任克彬, 张先伟, 尹松, . 不同含水率下石灰−偏高岭土改良遗址土宏微观特性的冻融循环效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2894-2906.
[4] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 刘欣宇, 李亚博. 含水率和剪切速率对黏性滑带土剪切行为及损伤演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2471-2482.
[5] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[6] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[7] 姜海波, 卢燕, 李琳, 张军, . 干湿-冻融作用输水渠道膨胀土强度特性及损伤演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1356-1367.
[8] 杨艳霜, 闫磊, 张占荣, 刘永莉, 崔臻, 彭剑承, 亢兆鹏, . 基于三相孔隙介质模型的地震动传播特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1109-1121.
[9] 罗宣兵, 李清林, 陈文娟, 杨潇飞, 张美雪, . 不同含水率-冻结温度-骆驼刺根系含量下砂土冻融变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1174-1186.
[10] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
[11] 许庆钊, 史文豹, 常聚才, 苗壮, 闫澳运, 李传明, 齐潮. 不同加载速率含水煤样力学响应及宏微观破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 881-893.
[12] 郭旭辉, 朱鸿鹄, 吴冰, 高宇新, 胡乐乐, 曹鼎峰, . 基于人工神经网络的黄土含水率光纤被动感测技术研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 653-664.
[13] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[14] 王军, 张凯宇, 陈晟凯, 秦伟, 倪俊峰, 高紫阳, 张一帆, . 爆破挤淤法中炸药埋深对土体参数影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 123-132.
[15] 杨家强, 朱玉龙, 奚邦禄, 张振华, . 不同含水率下脏污道砟累积塑性变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 715-722.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!