岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 2537-2544.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0488

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土工泡沫减压膨胀土挡墙侧向压力及影响因素分析

邹维列1,樊科伟2,张攀1,韩仲1   

  1. 1. 武汉大学 土木建筑工程学院,湖北 武汉 43007;2. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-20 接受日期:2023-06-18 出版日期:2023-09-11 发布日期:2023-09-02
  • 通讯作者: 樊科伟,男,1991年生,博士,博士后,主要从事土工合成材料应用原理等方面的科研工作。E-mail: fkwhhu@163.com E-mail:zwilliam@whu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:邹维列,男,1970年生,博士,教授,从事非饱和土特性、土工合成材料应用原理等方面的教学与科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51979206);国家重点研发计划(No.2019YFC1509800);江苏省卓越博士后计划(No.2023ZB830);湖北省自然科学基金(No.2021CFB389)

Analysis of lateral pressures on expansive soil retaining wall with expanded polystyrene geofoam inclusions and influence factors

ZOU Wei-lie1, FAN Ke-wei2, ZHANG Pan1, HAN Zhong1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering of Ministry of Education, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China
  • Received:2023-04-20 Accepted:2023-06-18 Online:2023-09-11 Published:2023-09-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51979206), the National Key Research and Development Project (2019YFC1509800), Jiangsu Province Excellent Postdoctoral Program (2023ZB830) and Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2021CFB389).

摘要: 墙后膨胀性填土在吸水膨胀后,将对挡墙产生较大的侧向压力,严重时可能引起挡墙失稳。在墙背与膨胀性填土之间铺设可发性聚苯乙烯土工泡沫(expanded polystyrene geofoam,简称EPS)缓冲层,利用EPS的高压缩特性,为填土的侧向变形提供空间,可有效减小作用于挡墙的侧向压力。为了探明墙后铺设EPS的膨胀土挡墙在膨胀土浸润至饱和状态时,侧向压力沿墙高的分布规律及影响因素,开展了EPS减压膨胀土挡墙模型试验和相应的理论分析。结果表明:(1)当膨胀土浸润至饱和时,铺设密度为12 kg/m3的EPS可减小膨胀土挡墙约50%的总侧向压力;(2)无EPS的膨胀土挡墙的侧向压力沿墙深逐渐增大,而含EPS的膨胀土挡墙的侧向压力沿墙深基本相同;(3)EPS厚度越大,密度越小,对挡墙侧向压力的减压效果越好。

关键词: 挡土墙, 膨胀土, 土工泡沫, 模型试验, 侧向压力

Abstract: Expansive soils, known for their considerable swelling pressure upon wetting, have been identified as potential instigators of instabilities in retaining walls. The incorporation of expanded polystyrene geofoam (EPS) inclusions between the retaining wall and the backfilled expansive soil has been found to considerably mitigate the lateral pressure on the wall, which results from the water absorption and expansion of the expansive soil. This substantial reduction is due to the impressive compressibility of the EPS inclusion. To explore the implications of the EPS inclusion on the lateral pressure distribution on retaining walls, and to analyze the factors influencing this pressure, a comprehensive model test and a corresponding lateral pressure theoretical analysis were performed. The results show that (1) the total lateral pressure acting on the retaining wall was reduced by about 50% by the EPS inclusion with a density of 12 kg/m3 when the expansive soil is saturated in the model test; (2) in the absence of the EPS inclusion, the lateral pressure distribution acting on the retaining wall escalated along its depth, whereas with the EPS inclusion, it remained largely uniform throughout the wall’s depth; and (3) the lateral pressure reduction due to the EPS inclusion was enhanced with increasing thickness and decreasing density of the EPS inclusion.

Key words: retaining wall, expansive soils, expanded polystyrene geofoam, model test, lateral pressure

中图分类号: TU473
[1] 马滨, 王丽艳, 吉文炜, 吴晗, 蔡晓光, 王炳辉, . 强震下返包胎面加筋挡土墙结构抗震性能模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2792-2804.
[2] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[3] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[4] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[5] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[6] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[7] 姜海波, 卢燕, 李琳, 张军, . 干湿-冻融作用输水渠道膨胀土强度特性及损伤演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1356-1367.
[8] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[9] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[10] 郑舒文, 刘松玉, 李迪, 童立元, 吴恺, . 膨胀土基泡沫轻质土力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1455-1465.
[11] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[12] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[13] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[14] 周振华, 孔令伟, 李甜果, 舒荣军, . 原状膨胀土裂隙演变性状的环境效应与表征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 402-412.
[15] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!