岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (S1): 461-475.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1591

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

珊瑚砂界限干密度确定方法的比较研究

瞿茹1, 2,朱长歧1,刘海峰1,王天民1, 2,马成昊1, 2,王星3   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049;3. 广州大学 土木工程学院,广东 广州510006
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-13 接受日期:2023-01-03 出版日期:2023-11-16 发布日期:2023-11-19
  • 通讯作者: 朱长歧,男,1963年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事海洋工程地质、珊瑚礁岩土的力学特性、地基加固理论的研究及实践。E-mail:cqzhu@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:quru2019@163.com
  • 作者简介:瞿茹,女,2000年生,硕士研究生,主要从事珊瑚砂颗粒物理力学特性方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No.2021YFC3100604);国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.42277185,No.41877271)

A comparative study of methods for determining boundary dry density of coral sand

QU Ru1, 2, ZHU Chang-qi1, LIU Hai-feng1, WANG Tian-min1, 2, MA Cheng-hao1, 2, WANG Xing3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, China
  • Received:2022-10-13 Accepted:2023-01-03 Online:2023-11-16 Published:2023-11-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(2021YFC3100604) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (42277185, 41877271).

摘要:

界限干密度(包含最大及最小干密度)是影响砂土力学性质的重要参数,将国标规范中干密度测定方法应用于岛礁珊瑚砂时,该类砂在干密度测定过程中产生了不可忽略的颗粒破碎,使得测定结果严重失真。分别采用中国(GB)、美国(ASTM)、日本(JIS)三国的相关规范,开展了针对珊瑚砂的界限干密度测定方法的比较研究;并与ISO标准砂的测定结果进行对比,进而提出适合于珊瑚砂干密度测定的建议方法。研究结果表明:对于不同粒径的珊瑚砂与标准砂,3种规范最小干密度测定结果为: ρjisdminρGBdminρASTMdmin;最大干密度测定结果为: ρJISdmaxρGBdmax ≈ρASTMdmax 。珊瑚砂与标准砂在3种规范中干密度差异性大小Δρd随粒径变化规律存在显著的区别。随着含水率的增大,珊瑚砂的最大最小干密度均为: ρJISdρGBdρASTMd;不同规范间干密度差异性大小随含水率的增加先增大后基本保持不变。中国规范在干密度测定过程中的颗粒破碎远大于美国规范和日本规范。综合来看,美国规范所采用的干密度测定方法具有砂样状态定义清晰、操作简单、适用粒径范围广、界限干密度测定结果理想、颗粒破碎量少且干密度测定结果离散性小等优点,因而是一种适合珊瑚砂界限干密度测定的方法。

关键词: 珊瑚砂, 干密度测定方法, 颗粒破碎, 含水率, 相对密度

Abstract: The boundary dry density (including the maximum and the minimum dry density) is an important parameter affecting the mechanical properties of sand. When the method for determination of dry density in the Chinese specification is applied to the coral sand from the island reefs, the particle breakage of coral sand cannot be ignored during the procedure of measuring dry density, which will introduce great errors to the results. In this paper, the specifications of China, the United States and Japan were adopted to conduct a comparative study of methods for determining the boundary dry density of coral sand. Furthermore, the results of ISO standard sand were compared, thereby proposing a recommended method which was suitable for determining the boundary dry density of coral sand. The results demonstrate that the results of the minimum dry density determined by the three specifications mentioned above are ρjisdmin< ρGBdmin< ρASTMdmin  for coral sand and standard sand with different particle sizes; and the maximum dry density results determined are ρJISdmaxρGBdmax ≈ρASTMdmax . The dry density difference (Δρd) between coral sand and standard sand measured by the three specifications varies dramatically with the particle size. With the increase of moisture content, the maximum and the minimum dry densities of coral sand both present the trend of ρJISdρGBd < ρASTM; and the difference in dry density between different specifications increases with increasing moisture content, and remains stable subsequently. The Chinese specification for particle breakage in the dry density determination process is much larger than the American specification and the Japanese specification. In summary, the determination method of dry density adopted by the American specification has the advantages of clear definition of sand sample state, simple operation, wide range of particle size, ideal dry density results, less particle breakage and small discreteness of dry density results, thus it is a suitable method for the determination of dry density of coral sand.

Key words: coral sand, methods for determination of dry density, particle breakage, moisture content, relative density

中图分类号: TU 441
[1] 王勇, 顾凯, 张博, 姜霖, 施斌, . 基于分布式温度测试和重建的浅表土体含水率反演[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 531-540.
[2] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[3] 李新明, 何永飞, 谈云志, 任克彬, 张先伟, 尹松, . 不同含水率下石灰−偏高岭土改良遗址土宏微观特性的冻融循环效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2894-2906.
[4] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 刘欣宇, 李亚博. 含水率和剪切速率对黏性滑带土剪切行为及损伤演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2471-2482.
[5] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[6] 陈嘉瑞, 樊宝云, 叶剑红, 张春顺, . 钙质砂颗粒破碎特性及破碎演化模型三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2095-2105.
[7] 胡丰慧, 方祥位, 申春妮, 王春艳, 邵生俊, . 真三轴条件下珊瑚砂颗粒破碎、强度和剪胀性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2147-2159.
[8] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[9] 姜海波, 卢燕, 李琳, 张军, . 干湿-冻融作用输水渠道膨胀土强度特性及损伤演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1356-1367.
[10] 杨艳霜, 闫磊, 张占荣, 刘永莉, 崔臻, 彭剑承, 亢兆鹏, . 基于三相孔隙介质模型的地震动传播特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1109-1121.
[11] 罗宣兵, 李清林, 陈文娟, 杨潇飞, 张美雪, . 不同含水率-冻结温度-骆驼刺根系含量下砂土冻融变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1174-1186.
[12] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
[13] 许庆钊, 史文豹, 常聚才, 苗壮, 闫澳运, 李传明, 齐潮. 不同加载速率含水煤样力学响应及宏微观破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 881-893.
[14] 郭旭辉, 朱鸿鹄, 吴冰, 高宇新, 胡乐乐, 曹鼎峰, . 基于人工神经网络的黄土含水率光纤被动感测技术研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 653-664.
[15] 刘璐, 李帅学, 张鑫磊, 高洪梅, 王志华, 肖杨. 微生物加固珊瑚砂动剪切模量与阻尼比特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3410-3420.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!