岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (S1): 593-602.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1780

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

间歇式滑坡变形力学机制与单体预警案例研究

吴爽爽1,胡新丽2,孙少锐1,魏继红1   

  1. 1.河海大学 地球科学与工程学院,江苏 南京 211100;2.中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-15 接受日期:2023-02-18 出版日期:2023-11-16 发布日期:2023-11-19
  • 作者简介:吴爽爽,男,1993年生,博士,博士后,讲师,主要从事滑坡灾害预测预警与风险评价研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 42307193, No.42020104006)。

A case study of mechanism for intermittent deformation and early warning of landslides

WU Shuang-shuang1, HU Xin-li2, SUN Shao-rui1, WEI Ji-hong1   

  1. 1. School of Geosciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211100, China; 2. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2022-11-15 Accepted:2023-02-18 Online:2023-11-16 Published:2023-11-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42307193, 42020104006).

摘要: 水库区水位波动条件下常诱发滑坡阶跃,阶跃指滑坡的变形突然发生、戛然而止,位移曲线呈多台阶状,具有间歇式、突发、(准)周期性的特点。选取典型阶跃型水库滑坡案例,在现场多年监测工作基础上,揭示滑坡变形特征,引入黏滑理论,阐明滑坡阶跃力学机制;其次,考虑现有预警方法在阶跃型滑坡中的局限性,基于机器学习开发预警新方法。结果表明:渗流作用下滑带土黏滑可能是滑坡阶跃的力学机制;采用多机器学习算法,选取人工神经网络(artificial neural network,ANN)和C5.0算法综合确定了西南库区某大型滑坡水位与水位变化率阈值,建立了该二维预警阈值间的反比例数学关系,预警准确率达86.7%。该研究将黏滑理论引入滑坡力学机制分析中,并基于多机器学习算法综合确定预警阈值,为相关研究及应用提供借鉴。

关键词: 滑坡, 水位, 黏滑, 阈值, 接收者操作特征曲线(ROC曲线), 机器学习

Abstract: Landslide with stepwise deformation often occurs under water level fluctuations in reservoir areas. Its displacement curve is multi-step, with intermittent, sudden, (quasi) periodic characteristics. This study selects a typical reservoir landslide case with the stepwise feature. Based on years of on-site monitoring, the feature of stepwise deformation is revealed. A theory of stick-slip is introduced to reasonably explain the mechanism of stepwise deformation. Secondly, considering the limitations of existing methods in the early warning for this landslide type, a new method of threshold definition and warning is developed based on machine learning. The results show that the seepage effect controls the process of stick-slip of the sliding zone soils. It is the likely mechanism of stepwise deformation of the landslide. Moreover, based on artificial neural network (ANN) and C5.0 algorithms, a two-dimensional threshold scheme for water level factor is defined, and the inverse proportional relationship between water level and rate of water level change is founded. The accuracy rate of early warning reaches 86.7%. This case study provides references for the introduction of the concept of stick-slip into landslide mechanism studies and machine learning techniques into threshold definition.

Key words: landslide, water level, stick-slip, threshold, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, machine learning

中图分类号: TU 42
[1] 蔡启航, 董学超, 郭明伟, 卢正, 徐安, 蒋凡, . 基于刃脚土压力的超大锚碇沉井基础下沉智能预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 377-388.
[2] 江晓童, 张西文, 吕颖慧, 李仁杰, 江浩, . 机器学习在岩土工程中的应用现状与未来展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 419-436.
[3] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[4] 秦悠, 龙慧, 吴琪, 庄海洋, 陈国兴. 复杂应力路径下饱和珊瑚砂孔压增长与刚度退化的阈值应变试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3441-3450.
[5] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[6] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 廖清香, 李爽, 段岳强. 基于时序聚类和在线学习的盾构掘进地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[7] 张胜, 徐鼎平, 石汉明, 吴小刚, 易明尚, . 峰前循环扰动下的深埋花岗岩特征参数演化规律与损伤变量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 73-87.
[8] 钱法桥, 邓亚虹, 慕焕东, 杨楠, 刘凡, 王梦晨, . 基于小波变换和拟动力法的边坡地震稳定性评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 88-96.
[9] 李秋旺, 冯万里, 黄波林, 董星辰, 陈云飞, . 三峡库区涉水滑坡涌浪预测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 424-432.
[10] 龙潇, 孙锐, 郑桐, . 基于卷积神经网络的液化预测模型及可解释性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[11] 赵宽耀, 许强, 陈婉琳, 彭大雷, 高登辉, . 黄土塬边漫灌区土体水入渗过程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2754-2764.
[12] 林滨强, 章德生, 简文彬, 豆红强, 王浩, 樊秀峰, . 风驱雨作用下植被斜坡稳定性响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2765-2774.
[13] 贺隆平, 姚囝, 王其虎, 叶义成, 凌济锁, . 基于自动机器学习的岩爆烈度分级预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2839-2848.
[14] 张伟, 晏飞, 王兆丰, 李邵军, . 基于物质点和深度积分耦合模型的滑坡数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2515-2526.
[15] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!