岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10): 3003-3012.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0295

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

锚固条件下煤系地层裂隙岩体蠕变力学特性研究

李天国1,唐彬1, 2,程桦1,刘小虎1,侯俊领3,李宏亮4,王晓云1   

  1. 1.安徽理工大学 土木建筑学院,安徽 淮南 232001;2.安徽理工大学 深部煤矿采动响应与灾害防控国家重点实验室,安徽 淮南 232001; 3.攀枝花学院 钒钛学院,四川 攀枝花 617000;4.淮南矿业(集团)有限责任公司,安徽 淮南 232001
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-10 接受日期:2024-05-31 出版日期:2024-10-09 发布日期:2024-10-11
  • 通讯作者: 唐彬,男,1987年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事矿山岩土工程方面的教学科研工作。E-mail: tangbin0554@163.com
  • 作者简介:李天国,男,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事矿山岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail: ltg0403@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51804006);安徽省自然科学基金面上项目(No. 2208085ME118)。

Creep mechanical characteristics of fractured rock mass in coal measure strata under anchoring conditions

LI Tian-guo1, TANG Bin1, 2, CHENG Hua1, LIU Xiao-hu1, HOU Jun-ling3, LI Hong-liang4, WANG Xiao-yun1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Mining Response and Disaster Prevention and Control in Deep Coal Mines, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China; 3. Vanadium and Titanium College, Panzhihua College, Panzhihua, Sichuan 617000, China; 4. Huainan Mining Industry (Group) Co., Ltd., Huainan, Anhui 232001, China
  • Received:2024-03-10 Accepted:2024-05-31 Online:2024-10-09 Published:2024-10-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51804006) and the General Program of Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2208085ME118).

摘要: 为探究煤系地层裂隙岩体锚固状态下的蠕变特性,开展不同裂隙倾角(15°、30°、45°、60°、90°)下裂隙加锚试件、裂隙无锚试件、完整试件的单轴蠕变试验。试验结果表明:相同应力加载等级时,裂隙无锚试件的瞬时应变量大于完整试件的瞬时应变量,而裂隙加锚试件与完整试件的瞬时应变量之差随着裂隙倾角的增加逐渐减小;随着应力加载等级的增加,各岩石试件的稳态蠕变量也逐级增大;含裂隙试件的稳态蠕变速率随着裂隙倾角增大呈先下降再上升的趋势,但裂隙加锚试件的稳态蠕变速率小于相同应力等级下裂隙无锚试件的稳态蠕变速率;在裂隙倾角较低时,裂隙无锚试件和裂隙加锚试件的裂纹贯通发展规律差异较大;基于CVISC蠕变模型进行参数反演,得出Maxwell和Kelvin相关系数随应力加载等级的变化趋势;采用应力-应变等时曲线法和非稳定流变判别法研究裂隙试件的长期强度变化规律。该研究结果为煤矿巷道长期稳定性分析及锚杆支护方案提供了试验依据。

关键词: 煤矿, 裂隙, 锚杆, 蠕变, 长期强度, CVISC蠕变模型

Abstract: To investigate the creep characteristics of fractured rock mass in coal measure strata under anchorage, uniaxial creep tests were carried out on anchored, unanchored fractured and intact specimens at different fracture dip angles (15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°). The results show that the instantaneous strain of the unanchored fractured specimens is greater than that of the intact specimens under the same stress loading level. The difference between the anchored fractured specimens and the intact specimens gradually decreases as fracture inclination increases. With the increase of stress loading level, the steady-state creep variable of each rock specimen also increases. The steady-state creep rate of fractured specimens initially decreases and then increases with the increase of fracture dip angle. However, the steady-state creep rate of anchored fractured specimens is lower than that of unanchored fractured specimens under the same stress level. Significant differences in crack penetration development exist between unanchored and anchored fractured specimens at low fracture dip angle. Based on the CVISC creep model, parameter inversion was performed, and the trends of Maxwell and Kelvin correlation coefficients with stress loading level were obtained. The stress-strain isochronous curve method and the unsteady rheological discriminant method were employed to study the long-term strength variation of fractured specimens. The research results provide an experimental basis for long-term stability analysis and bolt support schemes of coal mine roadway.

Key words: coal mine, fracture, bolts, creep, long-term strength, CVISC creep model

中图分类号: TU 457
[1] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[2] 付强, 杨科, 刘钦节, 宋涛涛, 吴犇牛, 于鹏, . 交变荷载下围岩−衬砌组合结构界面强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 40-52.
[3] 陶志刚, 李梦楠, 于海军, 范方政, 王炯, . 不同锚固孔径下2G-NPR锚杆锚固特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 67-80.
[4] 黄曼, 宁昊晟, 洪陈杰, 陶志刚, 刘雨星, 张贺, . 基于第二代负泊松比锚杆加固的充填结构面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 131-140.
[5] 李槟, 申海萌, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 不同围压条件下花岗岩剪切过程渗透率动态演化规律数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 437-453.
[6] 聂耀武, 胡兵, 顾雷雨, 李槟, 周全超, 李文辉, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 二氧化碳地质封存协同上覆煤矿开采的安全风险评估数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 491-506.
[7] 苗日成, 唐贝, 祁飞, 江志安, 崔溦, . 随机裂隙岩体滚刀破岩过程离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 541-552.
[8] 王想君, 李英明, 赵光明, 孟祥瑞, 范朝涛, 付强, . 围岩变形作用下考虑杆体屈服和锚固界面滑移的全长锚固锚杆力学解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2687-2702.
[9] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[10] 王昕琪, 冯子军, 陈正男, 高祺, 阴伟涛, 靳佩桦, 李玉彬, . 超临界水作用下花岗岩裂隙渗流特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2847-2858.
[11] 王邺, 王述红, 张泽, 韩博文, 杨润生, . 裂隙及水幕影响下的水封洞库油品运移范围研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2907-2928.
[12] 王炳文, 刘臣毅, 康明超, 李乾龙, 杨雷, 周森林, 钱垒. 考虑应力的非闭合裂隙岩体损伤机制及裂纹扩展研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2409-2420.
[13] 高帅, 任富强, 常远. 预制单裂隙砂岩注浆过程中的浆液流动特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2505-2515.
[14] 熊飞, 刘新荣, 刘文武, 钟祖良, 杨忠平, 王南云, 王浩, 薛熠, . 含深大裂隙陡崖式岩溶山体采动破坏与失稳机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2516-2531.
[15] 孙闯, 蒲云波, 敖云鹤, 陶琦, . 冻融饱水裂隙砂岩力学特性及细观破裂演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2339-2352.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!