岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 3333-3344.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0057

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

高地应力环境下跨活断层隧道抗错断铰接设计试验研究

张佳威1, 2,崔臻1,张翔宇1,曹俊1   

  1. 1.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 2.武汉轻工大学 土木工程与建筑学院,湖北 武汉 430023
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-10 接受日期:2024-02-23 出版日期:2024-11-11 发布日期:2024-11-15
  • 作者简介:张佳威,男,1999年生,博士研究生,主要从事地下抗震方面的研究。E-mail: zhangjiawei991015@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划青年科学家项目(No. 2023YFB2390400);云南省重大科技专项计划项目(No. 202102AF080001);国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 52079133,No. 52379112);水利部重大科技项目(No. SKS-2022103)。

Hinged design for resisting shear displacement of a deep-buried tunnel crossing an active fault under high in-situ stress conditions

ZHANG Jia-wei1, 2, CUI Zhen1, ZHANG Xiang-yu1, CAO Jun1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan, Hubei 430023, China
  • Received:2024-01-10 Accepted:2024-02-23 Online:2024-11-11 Published:2024-11-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Programs for Young Scientists (2023YFB2390400), Yunnan Major Science and Technology Special Program (202102AF080001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52079133, 52379112) and the Key Research Program of the Ministry of Water Resources (SKS-2022103).

摘要: 当活动断层发生错动时,穿越活动断层的隧道会发生不同程度的破坏。以往的研究大多未考虑隧道埋深、高应力对跨活断层隧道的影响,结果不太能贴切实际。充分讨论了解决深埋隧道抗错断问题的必要性,通过跨活断层隧道模型试验,对比深埋隧道与浅埋隧道的破坏差异,并通过深埋铰接隧道错断试验,分析了隧道外部应力变化、衬砌应变与破坏形态。结果表明:(1)在深埋与浅埋环境下隧道整体变形皆呈“S”型变形,破坏较严重的区域都集中在断层带位置,其中深埋隧道的破坏模式主要以剪切拉伸破坏为主,产生了较大的挤压变形,破坏区域较大,而浅埋隧道主要以剪切破坏为主,在跨断层位置隧道被剪断。(2)在对深埋隧道进行铰接设计后,隧道由“S”型变形转化成“阶梯”型,隧道应变与外部岩体应力峰值得到降低,破坏程度显著减小。(3)通过对隧道衬砌裂纹分布分析,发现无铰接隧道为贯穿型破坏,裂纹影响至整个衬砌,铰接隧道裂纹影响范围约占隧道总长的66.6%,短铰接节段隧道裂纹影响范围约占隧道总长的33.3%,故深埋环境下采用更短的铰接节段对隧道的抗错断效果更佳。(4)通过对比前人研究的浅埋铰接隧道得出,浅埋铰接隧道在断层带外也会发生变形,而深埋铰接隧道破坏主要集中在断层带内位置,因此对于深埋隧道抗错断保护措施应当多集中在断层带位置。

关键词: 隧道工程, 跨活断层, 高地应力, 铰接设计, 模型试验

Abstract: When movement occurs in active faults, tunnels crossing these faults may sustain varying degrees of damage. Most previous studies failed to consider the impact of tunnel depth and high in-situ stress on tunnels crossing active faults, resulting in findings that are not entirely practical. In this paper, the necessity of solving the anti-dislocation problem of deeply buried tunnels is systematically discussed. Through model tests of tunnels crossing active faults, the differences in failures between deeply buried and shallowly buried tunnels were compared. Additionally, a dislocation test of deeply buried segmented tunnels was conducted to analyze the external stress changes, lining strains, and failure modes of the tunnels. The results are as follows: (1) The overall deformation of both deeply and shallowly buried tunnels exhibits an S-shaped pattern. The most severe damage is concentrated in the fault zone. The failure mode of deeply buried tunnels is primarily characterized by shear and tensile failure, resulting in significant compressive deformation and a larger damaged area. In contrast, shallowly buried tunnels mainly experience shear failure, with the tunnel being sheared apart at the fault crossing. (2) After implementing the hinged design for the deeply buried tunnel, the S-shaped deformation pattern is transformed into a ladder pattern, reducing the strain on the tunnel and the peak stress of the external rock mass, thereby significantly mitigating damages. (3) Through the analysis of the distribution of cracks in the tunnel lining, it is found that the tunnel without a hinged design has suffered from penetrating failure, with cracks affecting the entire lining. The cracks in the hinged tunnel affect approximately 66.6% of the total tunnel length, while those in the tunnel with shorter hinged segments affect only about 33.3% of the total length. Therefore, a deeply buried tunnel with shorter hinged segments can yield a better anti-dislocation effect. (4) By comparing previous studies on shallowly buried hinged tunnels, it is concluded that shallowly buried hinged tunnels will also suffer from deformation outside the fault zone, while the damages to the deeply buried hinged tunnel are concentrated mainly in the fault zone. Therefore, the anti-dislocation protection measures for deeply buried tunnels should be concentrated mainly in the fault zone. These findings can provide theoretical guidance and technical support for the design and reinforcement of tunnels crossing active faults under high stress conditions.

Key words: tunnel project, crossing active fault, high in-situ stress, segmental structure design, model test

中图分类号: U 451
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[8] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[9] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[10] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[11] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[12] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[13] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[14] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[15] 孙旻洋, 王忠瑾, 谢新宇, 张日红, 娄扬, 朱大勇, . 饱和黏土中能源群桩热力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 382-390.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!