岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1003-1013.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0583

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

非饱和边坡中锚托板锚固尺寸的新算法

彭俊国,黄宇豪   

  1. 兰州理工大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730050
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-11 接受日期:2023-09-04 出版日期:2024-04-17 发布日期:2024-04-17
  • 作者简介:彭俊国,男,1981年生,博士,副教授,主要从事非饱和土压力方面的研究。E-mail:pengjg@lut.edu.cn

A new calculation method for the size of anchor plates in unsaturated slope

PENG Jun-guo, HUANG Yu-hao   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China
  • Received:2023-05-11 Accepted:2023-09-04 Online:2024-04-17 Published:2024-04-17

摘要: 锚托板支护结构因为其安全稳定、经济和安装简便等优点在填方加固边坡中得到推广应用。然而目前在锚托板支护结构设计过程中,锚托板尺寸仍没有成熟的计算方法,设计过于保守。利用对数螺旋线滑移面结合极限平衡法计算得到非饱和土的主动土压力。根据土体内部平衡求出每层锚托板所需承担的拉力,得到了锚托板尺寸的计算方法,根据滑移面的位置得到了锚托板自由段拉杆的最小设计长度。将主动土压力计算结果与现有的经典文献进行了对比分析,发现主动土压力系数变化趋势与现有结论一致。分析了降雨工况和地震工况对锚托板尺寸的影响,结果表明,在降雨强度较小时对锚托板锚固尺寸的影响可以忽略,但在同时考虑强降雨和地震时,会显著增加所需的锚托板锚固尺寸,最大增大幅度可达136.71%。分析结果可为锚托板锚固尺寸的设计提供参考。

关键词: 锚托板, 非饱和土, 主动土压力, 降雨, 地震

Abstract: Due to its safety, stability, low cost and easy installation, anchor plate support structure has been widely used in the slope that needs to be reinforced. However, currently in the design process of anchor plate support structure, there is no mature calculation method for the size of anchor plate, resulting in overly conservative design. To address this issue, we propose using the limit equilibrium method in combination with log-spiral slip surface to calculate the active earth pressure in unsaturated soils. Based on the internal balance of the soil, the tensile force required to bear for each layer of anchor plate is calculated, and the calculation method for the size of the anchor plate is obtained. The minimum design length of the free section of the anchor plate is obtained according to the shape of the sliding surface. The calculation results of active earth pressure are compared with the existing literature, and it is found that the change trend of active earth pressure coefficient is consistent with the existing conclusions. The impacts of rainfall and earthquake conditions on the size of anchor plate are analyzed, and the results show that low rainfall intensity has a negligible effect on the size of anchor plate. However, when considering both strong rainfall and earthquake, the required anchor plate size can be significantly increased, with a maximum of 136.71%. The analysis results can provide reference for determining the size of frame anchor plates.

Key words: anchor plate, unsaturated soil, active earth pressure, rainfall, earthquake

中图分类号: TU 476
[1] 赵武胜, 周帅, 解佩瑶, 高厚, 秦长坤, 陈卫忠, . 考虑初衬−二衬界面效应下隧道地震易损性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 477-490.
[2] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[3] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[4] 余小越, 许明, 谢强, 蔡宇, 刘先珊, 甘峰帆, . SH波在三角形山体地形中的散射与能量分布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2639-2649.
[5] 张振光, 徐杰, 范家燊, . 不排水条件下非饱和土球孔扩张的塑性新解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1988-1996.
[6] 范猛, 李敬军, 杨正权, 刘小生, 朱凯斌, 赵剑明, . 基于标准贯入试验的液化判别方法对深埋砂土适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[7] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[8] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[9] 杨景泉, 郑长杰, 丁选明, . 竖向入射P波激励下饱和土中管桩地震响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[10] 高品红, 高晨博, 彭成威, 刘飞禹, . 降雨作用下花岗岩残积土边坡模型试验及离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1632-1642.
[11] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[12] 杨艳霜, 闫磊, 张占荣, 刘永莉, 崔臻, 彭剑承, 亢兆鹏, . 基于三相孔隙介质模型的地震动传播特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1109-1121.
[13] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[14] 宋享桦, 肖衡林, 倪化勇, 谭勇, . 降雨作用下砂土边坡失稳破坏触发机制宏细观研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 969-979.
[15] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!