岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1081-1091.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0531

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

冲击荷载下含夹层饱和砂土孔压变化规律分析

金丹丹1, 2,鲁先东1,王炳辉3,施展1,张雷3   

  1. 1.江苏大学 土木工程与力学学院,江苏 镇江212013;2.中国地震局工程力学研究所 中国地震局地震工程与工程振动重点实验室, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150000;3.江苏科技大学 土木工程与建筑学院,江苏 镇江 212100
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-24 接受日期:2023-06-22 出版日期:2024-04-17 发布日期:2024-04-17
  • 通讯作者: 王炳辉,男,1980年生,博士,副教授,主要从事土动力学方面的研究。E-mail:wbhchina@126.com
  • 作者简介:金丹丹,女,1987年生,博士,副教授,主要从事土动力学方面的研究。E-mail:jindd@ujs.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国地震局工程力学研究所实验室开放基金(No.2021D19);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.51978317)。

Analysis of pore pressure variation pattern of saturated sandy soil containing interlayer under impact loading

JIN Dan-dan1, 2, LU Xian-dong1, WANG Bing-hui3, SHI Zhan1, ZHANG Lei3   

  1. 1. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150000, China; 3. Faculty of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212100, China
  • Received:2023-04-24 Accepted:2023-06-22 Online:2024-04-17 Published:2024-04-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration (2021D19) and the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978317).

摘要: 砂土中夹层的性状会影响饱和砂土孔压发展,从而影响砂土层变形。为研究夹层位置、厚度和种类等不同夹层状态下砂土液化过程中的孔压变化规律,设计了冲击荷载作用下层状砂液化试验,建立了含夹层饱和砂土理论模型,并将试验结果与理论分析进行对比。结果表明:含夹层饱和砂土的孔压发展呈现3个阶段,即快速上升、快速消散、缓慢消散阶段。高渗透性夹层高度越高,其下方土层孔压快速消散时长越短,越快趋于稳定值,但消散总时长无明显影响;低渗透性夹层高度或厚度的增大,均会使夹层上方孔压快速消散阶段速率加快,孔压消散稳定阶段延长,孔压消散总时长随之线性增长;同时,孔隙水会在低渗透性夹层下方形成水膜,夹层高度或厚度的增加均会使水膜持续时间增长,但水膜形态主要受夹层厚度影响。试验结果与理论分析较为一致,说明了试验的可靠性。

关键词: 层状砂土, 冲击荷载, 超孔隙水压力, 夹层高度, 夹层厚度, 水膜

Abstract: The existence of intercalation in sandy soil affect the pore pressure development in saturated sandy soil, thereby impacting the deformation of sandy soil layer. In order to study the pore pressure change during the liquefaction of sandy soil under different intercalation conditions such as location, thickness and type, a liquefaction test of laminated sand under impact load was conducted. This study involved establishing a theoretical model of saturated sandy soil with intercalations and comparing the test results with the theoretical analysis. The findings reveal that the development of pore pressure of saturated sandy soil containing intercalated layers exhibits three stages: rapid rise, rapid dissipation, and slow dissipation. In cases involving high-permeability intercalations, a higher location of the intercalation results in a shorter rapid dissipation time of pore pressure below it, leading to a faster convergence to a stable value. However, the total dissipation time shows no significant change. Conversely, for low-permeability intercalations, an increase in the height or thickness of the intercalation accelerates the rate of rapid dissipation phase of pore pressure above the intercalation, prolongs the stable phase of pore pressure dissipation, and linearly increases the total dissipation time of pore pressure. Additionally, a water film forms below the low-permeability intercalation, and increasing the intercalation height or thickness extends the duration of the water film, with the water film formation primarily affected by the intercalation thickness.. The test results are more consistent with the theoretical analysis, indicating the reliability of the test. The test results align more closely with the theoretical analysis, indicating the reliability of the test.

Key words: stratified sandy soil, impact load, excess pore water pressure, intercalation height, intercalation thickness, water film

中图分类号: TU 411.91
[1] 李晓锋, 李海波, 刘黎旺, 傅帅旸, . 冲击荷载作用下岩石动态拉伸破坏特征及细观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2387-2398.
[2] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[3] 姜立春, 李金柱, 李萍丰, 陈俊豪, . 顶板垮塌激励下多中段空区底板响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 916-929.
[4] 卢正, 李梦威, 唐楚轩, 胡智, 赵阳, 则志辉, 姚海林, . 考虑不同级配影响的填石路基压实质量评价研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3346-3354.
[5] 李顺群, 蔡田明, 张勋程, 张丙坤, 杨长松, 周光毅, 周燕, . 冲击荷载作用下非饱和场地的三维应力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 477-484.
[6] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[7] 王磊, 杨震宇, 陈礼鹏, 王勇, 张帅, 王安铖, 李伟利, . 不同超临界CO2浸蚀时间后冲击煤体能量演化与破坏特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2251-2262.
[8] 谢森林, 胡安峰, 肖志荣, 汪美慧, 胡训健, 陈俞超, . 基于广义Voigt模型的半渗透边界隧道周围饱和软土固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2024-2036.
[9] 张宪尚, 文光才, 朱哲明, 隆清明, 刘杰, . 冲击荷载下充填节理岩体I型裂纹动态扩展特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 396-406.
[10] 陈博文, 李琦, 谭永胜, 余涛, 高文彬, 李霞颖, 申筛成, . 不同有效应力下泥岩盖层二氧化碳突破压力演化特征的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3681-3693.
[11] 姜明归, 孙伟, 李金鑫, 樊锴, 刘增, . 冲击荷载下全尾砂胶结充填体断裂特性与能耗特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 186-196.
[12] 刘勇健, 傅杨攀, 赖明洋, 李彰明, 方昊圆, 谢治堃, . 冲击荷载下土体动力响应与加载速率效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2485-2494.
[13] 王磊, 张帅, 刘怀谦, 陈礼鹏, 朱传奇, 李少波, 王安铖, . 冲击荷载下含瓦斯煤能量耗散及损伤破坏规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1901-1915.
[14] 冉龙洲, 袁松, 王希宝, 王峥峥, 张生, . 明棚洞落石冲击荷载计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1748-1760.
[15] 杨奇, 王晓雅, 聂如松, 陈琛, 陈缘正, 徐方, . 间歇循环荷载作用下饱和砂土累积塑性变形及孔压特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1671-1683.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!