岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (S1): 461-470.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1172

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

电石渣-矿渣固化膨胀土强度及微观机制研究

黎宇1,胡明鉴2,郑思维3,王志兵1   

  1. 1. 桂林理工大学 土木工程学院,广西 桂林 541001;2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;3. 安徽理工大学 土木建筑学院,安徽 淮南 232001
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-02 接受日期:2023-08-22 出版日期:2024-09-18 发布日期:2024-09-21
  • 通讯作者: 胡明鉴,男,1974年生,博士,研究员,主要从事工程地质和水文地质方面的研究。E-mail: mjhu@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:黎宇,男,1999年生,硕士研究生,主要从事工程地质和地基处理方面的测试与分析研究。E-mail: 1787128042@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No.2022YFC3102101);国家自然科学基金重点项目(No.42230715)。

Study on the strength and microscopic mechanism of calcium carbide slag-slag cured expansive soil

LI Yu1, HU Ming-jian2, ZHENG Si-wei3, WANG Zhi-bing1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541001, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Geotechnical Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China
  • Received:2023-08-02 Accepted:2023-08-22 Online:2024-09-18 Published:2024-09-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFC3102101) and the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (42230715).

摘要: 针对南水北调中线地区膨胀土因环境湿度变化引起力学特性劣化导致的工程地质灾变问题,采用电石渣、矿渣作为固化材料对膨胀土进行改良,通过素膨胀土和改良固化膨胀土无侧限抗压强度、劈裂抗拉强度和水稳性等对比试验,分析改良固化前后的性能差异;通过X射线衍射(X-ray diffraction,XRD)、电镜扫描(electron microscope scanning,SEM)、热重分析(thermogravimetric analysis,TGA)试验及核磁共振(nuclear magnetic resonance,NMR)试验分析了电石渣−矿渣固化土的强度增长机制,揭示其微观作用机制。结果表明:以6%电石渣掺量为基础,不同矿渣掺量下的电石渣−矿渣复合改性固化土,总体上强度和耐水性能均有明显提高,并在矿渣掺量为9%时达到最大值。而随着养护龄期的增加,无侧限抗压强度和劈裂抗拉强度不断增加,水稳系数则有所减小。电石渣−矿渣复合固化土水化生成的水化硅酸钙(C-S-H)和水化铝酸钙(C-A-H),胶结土颗粒形成了紧密的团聚体,有效改善了土体的孔结构分布,提高了固化土的强度。电石渣−矿渣膨胀土复合固化方法效果明显,具有较好的工程应用前景。

关键词: 电石渣, 矿渣, 膨胀土, 强度, 水稳性, 微观机制

Abstract: This study addresses the engineering geological disaster resulting from the degradation of mechanical properties of expansive soil due to changes in environmental humidity along the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project. Calcium carbide slag and slag are utilized as curing materials to improve the expansive soil. Comparative tests were conducted on the unconfined compressive strength, split tensile strength, and water stability of untreated and treated expansive soil to analyze the performance differences pre- and post-treatment. The strength enhancement mechanism of the calcium carbide slag-slag cured soil was investigated through the X-ray diffraction (XRD), electron microscope scanning (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) test and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) test, revealing its microscopic mechanism of action. The results showed a significant increase in the overall strength and water resistance of the calcium carbide slag-slag composite modified cured soil with different slag dosage based on 6% dosage of calcium carbide slag, and a maximum value was reached when the slag dosage was 9%. Over time, the unconfined compressive strength and split tensile strength improved, while the water stability coefficient decreased notably. Hydration of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) and calcium aluminate hydrate (C-A-H) generated by the hydration of calcium carbide slag-slag composite cured soil led to the formation of tightly bonded soil particles, enhancing the soil’s pore structure distribution and strength. The evident effectiveness of the composite curing method for calcium carbide slag-slag treated soil suggests promising engineering applications.

Key words: calcium carbide slag, slag, expansive soil, strength, water stability, microscopic mechanism

中图分类号: TU443
[1] 付强, 杨科, 刘钦节, 宋涛涛, 吴犇牛, 于鹏, . 交变荷载下围岩−衬砌组合结构界面强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 40-52.
[2] 杨烜宇, 王勇, . 考虑不同凸起体宽度的规则形态土−岩界面剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 195-204.
[3] 吴倩婵, 章荣军, 徐志豪, 杨钊, 郑俊杰, . 絮凝剂对固化流泥强度行为及变形特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 205-216.
[4] 黄德昕, 温韬, 陈宁生, . 考虑能量演化的岩石残余强度确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2825-2836.
[5] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[6] 李晓锋, 李海波, 刘黎旺, 傅帅旸, . 冲击荷载作用下岩石动态拉伸破坏特征及细观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2387-2398.
[7] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[8] 沈扬, 沈嘉毅, 梁晖, 樊科伟. 基于3D打印技术的仿真钙质砂三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[9] 曹祎, 荣传新, 王衍森, 常磊, 王彬, . 冻结钙质黏土复杂应力路径下的力学响应及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2071-2084.
[10] 胡丰慧, 方祥位, 申春妮, 王春艳, 邵生俊, . 真三轴条件下珊瑚砂颗粒破碎、强度和剪胀性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2147-2159.
[11] 黄英豪, 毛帅东, 张娟, 王文翀, 王硕, . 轻质流态固化淤泥回填料基本性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1700-1708.
[12] 唐巨鹏, 黄磊, 潘一山, 任凌冉, 张昕, 张众华, . 煤层倾角突变区煤与瓦斯突出模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1719-1730.
[13] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[14] 祁凯, 万志辉, 戴国亮, 胡涛, 周峰, 张鹏, . 基于不同注浆材料固化钙质砂的力学性能试验及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1825-1838.
[15] 倪祖甲, 乔江美, 张俊楷, 唐旭海, . 基于微观岩石力学试验及精确矿物晶体建模的砂岩力学性质及波速分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1865-1880.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!