岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 133-146.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0284

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑土柱发展过程的淤泥真空预压大应变固结计算

孙宏磊1,徐振恺1,刘斯杰2,蔡袁强1   

  1. 1.浙江工业大学 土木工程学院,浙江 杭州 310014;2.武汉大学 土木建筑工程学院,湖北 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-06 接受日期:2024-07-17 出版日期:2025-01-10 发布日期:2025-01-04
  • 通讯作者: 刘斯杰,女,1994年生,博士后,主要从事流泥固结固化耦合理论方面的研究工作。E-mail: sijieliu@whu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:孙宏磊,男,1981年生,博士,教授,主要从事土动力学及地基处理方面的研究工作。E-mail: sunhonglei@zju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.52078464,No.52208367)。

Large strain consolidation calculation for slurries under vacuum preloading considering the development process of soil column

SUN Hong-lei1, XU Zhen-kai1, LIU Si-jie2, CAI Yuan-qiang1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310014, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • Received:2024-03-06 Accepted:2024-07-17 Online:2025-01-10 Published:2025-01-04
  • Supported by:
    The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078464, 52208367).

摘要: 由于疏浚淤泥性质特殊,其真空预压固结特性与以往不同,然而现有能够准确描述真空预压过程中土柱发展的大应变固结模型仍然较少,无法充分考虑土体淤堵特性随时间和位置的变化。针对该问题,建立了能考虑土柱半径增长过程的真空预压大应变固结模型,囊括了沿半径变化的渗透性、随时间变化的井阻、土体自重和非线性压缩渗透关系等因素的影响,推导了以孔隙比为控制变量的控制方程并采用有限差分法求解,获得了考虑土柱变化的疏浚淤泥真空预压固结行为的计算方法。通过将预测结果与现有分析模型进行比较,验证了所提出的模型的正确性,并通过参数分析,探讨了土柱区渗透系数分布模式、土柱半径增长时间和变井阻等因素的影响。研究结果表明,考虑土柱半径随时间的变化以及土体渗透性随到排水板距离的变化对固结计算结果有显著影响;忽略土柱发展过程将导致固结速度和固结度的计算结果偏低,造成的固结度计算误差可达10%以上;假定土柱渗透系数不随土体到排水板的距离变化而变化将低估固结速度和固结度,且误差随土柱的渗透性降低而增大;不同土柱半径增长时间下的固结度发展过程差异明显,该差异随着土柱半径的增大和土柱渗透系数的降低而增大。

关键词: 真空预压, 疏浚淤泥, 大应变固结, 土柱

Abstract: The consolidation characteristics of dredged slurry improved by vacuum preloading significantly deviate from conventional patterns due to its unique properties. However, there is a lack of large strain consolidation models that consider the development of soil columns during vacuum preloading, especially regarding the variation of soil clogging characteristics over time and spatial distribution. To address this issue, this study developed a large strain consolidation model for slurries improved by the vacuum preloading, incorporating the increasing radius of soil columns. The model integrates factors such as the variation of permeability with radius, time-dependent discharge capacity, soil self-weight, nonlinear compressibility and nonlinear permeability. The governing equations using void ratio as the control variable, were solved by the finite difference method to calculate consolidation behavior considering soil column variations. The proposed model was validated by comparing its predicted results with those from an existing analytical model. Based on this, a parametric study analyzed the influences of radial permeability distribution, soil column formation time and drain discharge capacity. The results indicate the necessity of considering soil column radius variation over time and its permeability relative to the distance from the prefabricated vertical drain in the computational model due to their significant influence. Ignoring the soil column development process underestimates both consolidation speed and degree, with errors exceeding 10%. Assuming the soil column’s permeability coefficient remains constant at different position along the radius also underestimates consolidation speed and degree, with the errors increasing as permeability decreases. The consolidation differences under various soil column radius growth times are substantial and increase as the soil column radius increases and the permeability coefficient decreases.

Key words: vacuum preloading, dredged slurries, large strain consolidation, soil column

中图分类号: TU 472
[1] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[2] 杨少朋, 杨爱武, 许福军, . 改性纤维排水板真空预压加固吹填软土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 789-797.
[3] 王浩, 郭帆, 陈锐, 刘垒雷, 罗之源. 植绿土质覆盖层渗流的温度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3998-4008.
[4] 张博溢, 徐龙飞, 陈建勋, 罗彦斌, 王伟波, 张 忆. 考虑振动影响的一维黄土土柱垂直入渗特性试验研究及非饱和渗透系数求解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3855-3868.
[5] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[6] 崔允亮, 潘方然, 高楥园, 金子原, . 真空预压淤堵区渗透系数的计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2085-2093.
[7] 刘景锦, 罗学思, 雷华阳, 郑刚, 罗昊鹏, . 等应变条件下增压式真空预压固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 809-821.
[8] 胡利文, 洪义, 王德咏, . 水下双面真空预压离心模型试验及数值模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 3059-3070.
[9] 张雷, 吕延栋, 王炳辉, 金丹丹, 竺明星, 方晨, . 絮凝−真空−电渗联合加固滩涂软土的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2383-2390.
[10] 雷华阳, 王磊, 刘景锦, 王鹏, 章纬地, 薄钰, . 化学改性联合真空预压法加固吹填土试验分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 891-900.
[11] 李长辉, 武航, 程国勇, 陈宇, 金敏, 常雷, . 不同排水板真空预压软土加固对比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2819-2827.
[12] 雷华阳, 王鹏, 刘旭, 王磊, . 基于气体运移规律的增压式真空预压法 加固机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 943-953.
[13] 胡利文, 刘志军, . 真空预压加固土体变形机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 790-799.
[14] 孙宏磊, 陆逸, 潘晓东, 史吏, 蔡袁强, . 真空预压作用下初始含水率 对疏浚淤泥固结影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 3029-3040.
[15] 蒲诃夫, 潘友富, KHOTEJA Dibangar, 周洋. 絮凝-水平真空两段式脱水法处理高 含水率疏浚淤泥模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!