岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 187-198.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0368

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于单孔冲刷测试的黏性土抗侵蚀性及各向异性试验研究

肖劲卿1, 2,温松诚1, 2,郭源1, 2, 3   

  1. 1.隧道工程灾变防控与智能建养全国重点实验室,广东 广州 510275;2.中山大学 土木工程学院,广东 广州510275; 3.南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室(珠海),广东 珠海519080
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-27 接受日期:2024-07-05 出版日期:2025-01-10 发布日期:2025-01-04
  • 通讯作者: 郭源,男,博士,副教授,主要从事滨海岩土工程水灾变方面的研究。E-mail: guoy229@mail.sysu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:肖劲卿,男,硕士研究生,主要从事软土抗侵蚀与冲刷防护方面的研究。E-mail: xiaojq9@mail2.sysu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金(No.42107167);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(No.2023A1515240003, No.2022A1515010693)。

Experimental study on clay erodibility and its anisotropy using hole erosion test

XIAO Jin-qing1, 2, WEN Song-cheng1, 2, GUO Yuan1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory for Tunnel Engineering, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510275, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510275, China; 3. Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, Guangdong 519080, China
  • Received:2024-03-27 Accepted:2024-07-05 Online:2025-01-10 Published:2025-01-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (42107167) and the Guangdong Fundamental and the Applied Fundamental Research Foundation (2023A1515240003, 2022A1515010693).

摘要: 黏性土抗侵蚀指标变异性大且影响因素复杂,已有研究多采用击实法制样后进行冲刷测试,土样性质不均匀且无法制备高塑性软黏土。以高岭土为例,采用饱和预固结方法模拟天然固结过程制样,开展黏性土单孔冲刷测试研究,并对冲蚀后孔壁形态进行三维扫描分析。针对土体不同先期固结压力与冲蚀方向下抗侵蚀指标差异,开展18组单孔冲刷测试,结果显示随着固结压力的增大,土体抗侵蚀性显著增加,而不同冲蚀方向下土体的临界切应力变化高达29%。扫描电镜结果表明,固结过程使黏性土颗粒排布呈现明显的层状堆叠结构,且高固结压力下土样的颗粒间孔隙更为紧密。针对土体径向各向异性系数κ-r 和粗糙度各向异性系数κpr 分析显示,土体临界切应力τc κ-r 具有较强负相关关系,而与κpr 关系不明显。

关键词: 黏性土, 抗侵蚀性, 单孔冲刷试验, 各向异性, 微观结构

Abstract: The erodibility of clay exhibits significant variability across different influencing factors. The existing research using compaction approach for specimen preparation neglected the non-uniformity in soil specimens and is unsuitable for high plasticity clay. In this study, the saturated preconsolidation approach was used to prepare uniform kaolinite specimens to simulate natural consolidating conditions. The prepared specimens were then analyzed using a hole erosion analyzer, and the surface morphology of the eroded hole was quantified using a 3D scanner. A total of 18 hole erosion tests were conducted under various preconsolidation pressures and erosion directions. The erosion resistances were found to increase with higher prestress, and the variation of critical shear stress across different erosion directions reached 29%. The SEM images reveal a stack-packing microstructure in the consolidated specimens, with a denser clay aggregate packing observed under higher pre-stress conditions. The anisotropic erosion property is properly described by the radial anisotropic coefficient κ-r  and the roughness anisotropic coefficient κpr , and the critical shear stress τ is negatively correlated with κ-r  , while its correlation with κpr is not obvious.

Key words: cohesive soil, erodibility, hole erosion test, anisotropy, microfabric

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 郅彬, 魏园钧, 王番, 张茜, 刘存利, 任会明, . 冻融循环作用下含Na2SO4盐原状黄土宏观强度与微观结构关联机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 106-120.
[2] 张兴文, 曹净, 雷舒羽, 李育红, 程芸, 张柠锐, . 富里酸环境对含腐殖酸水泥土结构及渗透性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 249-261.
[3] 胡伟, 曾攀煜, 王辉, 刘顺凯, 陈秋南, PUIG DAMIANS I, . 黏性土地基中水平条形锚板上拔承载力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1731-1744.
[4] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[5] 吕志涛, 赵志远, 蔡毅, 夏才初, 段君义. 单向冻融作用下砂岩力学各向异性演化与损伤模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3421-3430.
[6] 董佳斌, 鲁一帆, 金毅, 董文浩, 侯鹏, 刘顺喜, 牛然. 彭水页岩节理面形貌的分形特征及基于节理粗糙度系数的各向异性表征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3549-3561.
[7] 耿潇威, 陈成, 孙中华, 黎伟, 王勇, 徐梦冰, 余颂, . 基于广义位势理论的考虑组构各向异性的砂土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3175-3186.
[8] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[9] 贺元源, 彭绮澜, 王力, 王世梅, 佴磊, 徐燕, 吕岩, 陈勇, 张先伟, . 基于多微观手段的季冻区草炭土孔隙特征和渗透性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 110-122.
[10] 王丽艳, 蒋飞, 庄海洋, 王炳辉, 张雷, 李明, . 考虑水化期影响的橡胶−钢渣填料动力特性与微观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 53-62.
[11] 程鑫, 江文豪, 黄啸, 李爽, 王应富, 李江山, . 自硬化竖向屏障材料在Cr(Ⅵ)污染液作用下工程性能及微观结构演化[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 225-238.
[12] 孔洋, 阮怀宁, 汪璋淳, . 模拟柱状节理玄武岩试样的失效模式与各向异性特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 259-266.
[13] 高荡, 彭俊, 王航龙, 王林飞, 彭坤, . 含层理砂岩真三轴条件下力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 349-358.
[14] 王长虹, 魏永青, 张海东, 李飞. 地铁车站下水平冻结过程中冻胀的热−水−力耦合模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2775-2785.
[15] 张科, 关世豪, 齐飞飞, 徐奕, 金克盛, . 冲刷作用下砂岩宏观力学特性及微观结构[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1929-1938.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!