岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7): 2179-2188.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1263CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1263

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究

宋伟涛1,张佩2,杜修力3,林庆涛3   

  1. 1.南阳理工学院 土木工程学院,河南 南阳 473000;2.北京建筑大学 土木与交通工程学院,北京 102616; 3.北京工业大学 城市与工程安全减灾教育部重点实验室,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-14 接受日期:2025-02-05 出版日期:2025-07-10 发布日期:2025-07-09
  • 通讯作者: 张佩,女,1988年生,博士,副教授,主要从事隧道与地下工程领域研究。E-mail: zhangpei@bucea.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:宋伟涛,男,1990年生,博士,讲师,主要从事隧道工程等方面的研究工作。E-mail: songweitao720@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51908023,No.52025084);北京市自然科学基金项目(No.8232007);北京市教委科研项目(No.KM202310016013);河南省高等学校重点科研项目(No.24A560015);南阳市科技发展计划项目(No.23KJGG246)。

Influence of soil property on ground response during construction of shallow shield tunnel

SONG Wei-tao1, ZHANG Pei2, DU Xiu-li3, LIN Qing-tao3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Nanyang Institute of Technology, Nanyang, Henan 473000, China; 2. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 102616, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2024-10-14 Accepted:2025-02-05 Online:2025-07-10 Published:2025-07-09
  • Supported by:
    This word was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51908023, 52025084), the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (8232007), the Research Project of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (KM202310016013), the Key Scientific Research Projects for Higher Education of Henan Province (24A560015) and the Scientific and Technological Project of Nanyang City (23KJGG246).

摘要: 隧道工程是一种长线型工程。盾构掘进过程中先后穿越砂卵石地层和砂土地层是一种常见工况。为明确地层土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应的影响,依次开展砂卵石地层和砂土地层盾构掘进模型试验,并从盾构掘进力学参数、地表沉降曲线以及开挖面稳定性等角度,分析两种地层中隧道施工地层响应的异同点。结果表明:土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应具有显著影响。砂卵石地层中盾构掘进力学参数均大于砂土地层,且刀盘扭矩和螺旋出土器扭矩随螺旋出土器转速均呈负相关变化。两种地层中地表沉降曲线对称轴均偏离隧道中线,当刀盘顺时针旋转时,对称轴位于隧道中线左侧,且砂卵石地层中的偏移量显著大于砂土地层。砂卵石地层中开挖面出土量随时间呈“线性增加-保持不变”两阶段变化规律,地层土体呈局部失稳破坏模式;砂土地层开挖面出土量随时间始终呈线性增加趋势,地层土体呈整体失稳破坏模式,且地表塌坑中心位于盾构刀盘左前方。

关键词: 盾构隧道, 地层施工响应, 模型试验, 砂卵石地层, 砂土地层

Abstract: Tunnel engineering is a linear-type project. It is a common working condition for shield tunneling to successively penetrate sandy cobble strata and sandy strata. To clarify the influence of soil properties on the ground response during the construction of shallow-buried shield tunnels, shield tunneling model tests were sequentially conducted in sandy cobble strata and sandy strata. Then, from the perspectives of shield tunneling mechanical parameters, ground settlement curves, and face stability, the similarities and differences in the ground response during tunneling in these two types of strata were analyzed. The results show that soil properties have a significant impact on the ground response during the construction of shallow - buried shield tunnels. The shield tunneling mechanical parameters in sandy cobble strata are all greater than those in sandy strata. Moreover, both the cutterhead torque and the screw conveyor torque are negatively correlated with the rotation speed of the screw conveyor. The symmetry axes of the ground surface settlement curves in both strata deviate from the tunnel centerline. When the shield cutterhead rotates clockwise, the symmetry axis is located on the left side of the tunnel centerline, and the deviation in sandy cobble strata is significantly larger than that in sandy strata. In sandy cobble strata, the amount of excavated soil from the tunnel face shows a two - stage change pattern of "linear increase - constant" over time, and the soil in the stratum exhibits a local instability failure mode. In sandy strata, the amount of excavated soil from the tunnel face shows a continuous linear increase over time, and the soil in the stratum presents an overall instability failure mode. Additionally, the center of the ground surface collapse is located in the left - front area of the shield cutterhead.

Key words: shield tunnel, ground construction response, model test, sandy cobble strata, sandy ground

中图分类号: U 455
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋利埼, 章敏, 徐筱, 孙静雯, 俞奎, 李昕尧, . 考虑管片接头转动效应的盾构隧道光纤反演分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2483-2494.
[4] 宋牧原, 杨明辉, 陈伟, 卢贤锥, . 基于自注意力-循环神经网络模型的盾构引发的土体沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2613-2625.
[5] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[6] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[7] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[8] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[9] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[10] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[11] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[12] 黄明华, 钟煜轩, 陆锦斌, 王克平. 基于非连续地基梁模型的基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[13] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[14] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[15] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!