岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7): 2265-2280.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1557CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1557

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析

刘健1,夏勇2,江权1,陈涛3,贺维国4,范国刚4,熊先涛2,郑虹1   

  1. 1.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2.中国电建集团成都勘测设计研究院有限公司, 四川 成都 610072;3.华能四川能源开发有限公司,四川 成都 610041;4.中铁第六勘察设计院集团有限公司,天津 300308
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-18 接受日期:2025-03-20 出版日期:2025-07-10 发布日期:2025-07-09
  • 通讯作者: 江权,男,1978年生,博士,研究员,主要从事地下工程安全评价、大型洞室群稳定性分析、工程地质灾害治理等方面的研究工作。E-mail: qjiang@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:刘健,男,1991年生,博士,助理研究员,主要从事地下工程稳定性分析研究。E-mail: liujian@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.52325905);中国电力建设股份有限公司科技项目(No.DJ-HXGG-2023-04,No.DJ-HXGG-2023-16)。

Surrounding rock deformation and failure characteristics of Yingliangbao hydropower station in highly tectonic region and response analysis to Luding earthquake in underground caverns

LIU Jian1, XIA Yong2, JIANG Quan1, CHEN Tao3, HE Wei-guo4, FAN Guo-gang4, XIONG Xian-tao2, ZHENG Hong1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. PowerChina Chengdu Engineering Corporation Limited, Chengdu, Sichuan 610017, China; 3. Sichuan Huaneng Hydropower Corporation Limited, Chengdu, Sichuan 610017, China; 4. China Railway Liuyuan Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300308, China
  • Received:2024-12-18 Accepted:2025-03-20 Online:2025-07-10 Published:2025-07-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52325905) and the Technology Project of China Power Construction Corporation Limited (DJ-HXGG-2023-04, DJ-HXGG-2023-16).

摘要: 中国西部地区地质构造强烈、岩体赋存环境复杂,使得大型地下洞室群建造过程中面临围岩变形突变、破坏模式多样的严峻挑战。为此,围绕大渡河流域的硬梁包水电站地下洞室群,总结了中高应力下地下洞室群的典型应力-结构型破坏模式,分析了2022年“9·5”泸定地震对地下洞群围岩稳定性的影响,最后提出围岩应力-结构型破坏工程控制策略。研究表明:(1)3大洞室开挖后90%监测点围岩变形值小于100 mm,开挖变形服从对数正态分布;(2)开挖卸荷下硬梁包地下洞室围岩一般变形曲线为平缓台阶式状增长,但围岩劣化会引起围岩变形的跃迁式增长,单日变形量超过90 mm,突出反映了硬梁包花岗岩硬、脆、杂的变形特征;(3)锚索荷载总体呈现正态分布特征,锚索荷载较大部位与变形较大部位对应;(4)9.5泸定地震对3大洞室影响整体较小,但是对于应力集中区或不连续面附近的支护结构易造成不利影响;(5)地下洞室开挖存在浅层破坏频发、深层破坏处置难成本高的挑战,破坏模式上存在应力型、结构型以及应力-结构型破坏并存,以应力-结构型破坏为主。针对硬梁包地下洞室群围岩破坏问题,提出地下洞室支护的“保压-增强”原理,实践并验证了“精细爆破+快速喷砼+适时预应力锚杆”抑制浅层围岩劣化、“细分层+大吨位预应力锚索”抑制中深层围岩劣化的控制策略,可为中国西部大型地下洞室建造提供参考。

关键词: 地下洞室, 地震响应, 围岩变形, 破坏模式, 控制策略

Abstract: The intense geological structure and complex rock mass conditions in western China pose significant challenges to the construction of large underground cavern groups, including sudden changes in surrounding rock deformation and diverse failure modes. To address this issue, this study focuses on the underground cavern group of the Yingliangbao hydropower station in the Dadu River Basin, summarizing the typical stress-structure type failure modes of underground cavern groups under medium to high stress conditions, analyzing the impact of the September 5, 2022 Luding earthquake on the stability of the surrounding rock, and proposing engineering control strategies for stress-structure type rock mass failure. The study reveals that: 1) after excavation, 90% of the monitoring points showed surrounding rock deformation values less than 100 mm, with the deformation following a log-normal distribution; 2) under excavation unloading, the surrounding rock deformation curve of the Yingliangbao underground cavern generally exhibits a gentle step-like growth pattern, but rock mass deterioration can lead to a sudden increase in deformation, with a daily deformation exceeding 90 mm, highlighting the hard, brittle, and heterogeneous deformation characteristics of the Yingliangbao granite; 3) the overall anchorage load exhibits a normal distribution, with areas of higher anchorage load corresponding to areas of greater deformation; 4) the September 5 Luding earthquake had a relatively minor overall impact on the three major caverns, but may have adverse effects on the support structures near stress concentration zones or discontinuities; 5) the excavation of underground caverns faces challenges such as frequent shallow failures and high costs for addressing deep failures, with failure modes including stress-type, structure-type, and stress-structure type failures, dominated by stress-structure type failures. To address the surrounding rock failure issues at the Yingliangbao underground cavern group, this study proposes the “pressure maintenance-reinforcement” principle for underground cavern support, and verifies the effectiveness of “precision blasting + rapid shotcrete + timely pre-stressed anchors” in inhibiting shallow rock mass deterioration and “fine layering + high-tonnage pre-stressed anchors” in inhibiting mid-deep rock mass deterioration, providing a reference for the construction of large underground caverns in western China.

Key words: underground cavern, seismic response, surrounding rock deformation, failure mode, control strategy

中图分类号: U 453
[1] 王想君, 李英明, 赵光明, 孟祥瑞, 范朝涛, 付强, . 围岩变形作用下考虑杆体屈服和锚固界面滑移的全长锚固锚杆力学解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2687-2702.
[2] 储超群, 包兴佳, 毛明发, 吴顺川, 崔贺佳, . 深地灰岩三轴压缩声发射特征及破坏形式试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2049-2061.
[3] 杨景泉, 郑长杰, 丁选明, . 竖向入射P波激励下饱和土中管桩地震响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[4] 李邵军, 张世殊, 李永红, 柳秀洋, 李治国, 徐鼎平, 程丽娟, 江权, 汤大明, 陈刚, . 双江口水电站极高应力大型地下厂房硬岩破坏机制与稳定性控制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1581-1594.
[5] 汪昕, 幸安康, 曾子强, 姜祎, 徐建宇, 王晓南, 刘造保, . 层理铁矿石剪切力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1039-1048.
[6] 杨柳, 杨铎, 何满潮, . 基于纳米划痕的陆相页岩纹层界面过渡区分布范围定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 353-367.
[7] 张世殊, 徐国庆, 夏才初, 王升, . 压气储能地下洞室二衬预设缝参数优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3208-3218.
[8] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[9] 范浩, 王磊, 罗勇, 朱传奇, . 卸荷损伤砂岩的分级加载三轴蠕变力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 277-288.
[10] 周桓竹, 刘圣安, 李斌, 陈炜昀, 苏雷, 郑俊杰, 郑烨炜, . 穿越变化地层的沉管隧道接头地震响应的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 289-298.
[11] 高荡, 彭俊, 王航龙, 王林飞, 彭坤, . 含层理砂岩真三轴条件下力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 349-358.
[12] 韩勇, 李树忱, 袁超, 冯现大, 王修伟, . 单轴压缩下薄喷裂隙红砂岩力学性质与裂纹扩展特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2583-2594.
[13] 吴九江, 肖琳, 王丽娟, 张祎, . 基于粒子图像测速技术的节状地下连续墙变形特性与破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2707-2718.
[14] 陶志刚, 丰于翔, 赵易, 张晓宇, 何满潮, 雷啸天, . 穿断层隧道NPR锚索支护体系抗震特性振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
[15] 王通, 刘先峰, 袁胜洋, 蒋关鲁, 胡金山, 邵珠杰, 田士军, . 顺倾及反倾层状碎裂结构斜坡地震反应的大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 489-501.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!