岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 530-538.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0816CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0816

• 压缩空气储能地下工程专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

压缩空气储能电站地下内衬储气洞室群上覆岩体稳定性分析方法

曹校勇1, 2,关少钰2,叶欣欣2   

  1. 1. 长安大学 公路学院,陕西 西安 710064;2. 中交第一公路勘察设计研究院有限公司,陕西 西安 710075
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-30 接受日期:2025-10-15 出版日期:2026-02-10 发布日期:2026-02-04
  • 通讯作者: 关少钰,女,1995年生,硕士,工程师,主要从事隧道结构与压缩空气储能研究。E-mail: 1102687298@qq.com
  • 作者简介:曹校勇,男,1976年生,博士研究生,正高级工程师,主要从事隧道与地下工程及压缩空气储能相关科研工作。E-mail: 306534066@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省重点研发计划项目(No. 2025CY-YBXM-499)

Stability analysis method for underground lined storage cavern group in compressed air energy storage power station

CAO Xiao-yong1, 2, GUAN Shao-yu2, YE Xin-xin2   

  1. 1. School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710064, China; 2. CCCC First Highway Consultants Co., Ltd., Xi’an, Shaanxi 710075, China
  • Received:2025-07-30 Accepted:2025-10-15 Online:2026-02-10 Published:2026-02-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key R&D Program of Shaanxi Province (2025CY-YBXM-499).

摘要: 压缩空气储能洞室的埋深问题影响前期选址及整体稳定性评价,是人工储气洞室设计的关键环节。为研究压缩空气储能电站地下储气洞室群的抗抬破坏模式,基于单洞极限平衡法提出了考虑岩体摩擦力、黏聚力及临近洞室影响的群洞锥体破坏模型。引入等效滑移面与等效滑移面倾角ω 参数,通过中间块体与边侧块体作用力 E相等建立控制方程求解等效滑移面倾角ω,从而推导安全埋深。研究结果表明:考虑临近洞室影响的群洞模型埋深计算结果相较单洞模型略有增加,群洞模型更接近实际受力,计算更加合理。为研究群洞模型对设计参数的响应特性,系统分析了黏聚力、地应力侧压系数、洞径以及洞室间距对埋深的影响,分析结果表明:埋深与黏聚力呈负相关,与地应力侧压系数呈正相关;埋深随洞径的增大而增大,但小洞径的群洞效应更显著;埋深随相邻洞室间距的增大而减小,对于常规压缩空气储能洞室(洞径范围8~15 m),当相邻洞室间距大于4倍洞径时,群洞效应可忽略不计。

关键词: 地下工程, 压缩空气储能, 极限平衡, 群洞模型, 安全埋深

Abstract: The burial depth issue of compressed air energy storage(CAES) caverns significantly influences initial site selection and overall stability assessment, serving as a critical aspect in the design of artificial gas storage caverns. To investigate the uplift failure mode of tunnel-type gas storage reservoirs for CAES, we propose a multi-cavern conical failure model based on the single-cavern limit equilibrium framework. The model accounts for rock-mass friction and cohesion, as well as interactions between adjacent caverns. We introduce parameters describing the equivalent slip surface and its inclination angle ω . By enforcing equality of the inter-block force (Ea) between the central and lateral blocks, we derive a governing equation for ω. Solving this equation yields the safe burial depth. Research findings demonstrate that the calculation results of multi-cavern model, which considers the influence of adjacent caverns, are more reasonable compared to those of the single-cavern model. To further explore the response characteristics of the multi-cavern model to design parameters, we conduct a systematic analysis of the impacts of cohesion, horizontal in-situ stress coefficient, cavern diameter, and cavern spacing on buried depth. The results indicate that burial depth is negatively correlated with cohesion and decreases as cohesion increases. In contrast, burial depth is positively correlated with the horizontal in-situ stress coefficient and increases as this coefficient rises. Burial depth also increases with cavern diameter but decreases as the spacing between adjacent caverns increases. Notably, when the spacing between adjacent caverns exceeds four times the cavern diameter, the multi- cavern effect can be neglected.

Key words: underground construction, compressed air energy storage, limit equilibrium, muti-cavern model, safe burial depth

中图分类号: TU 93
[1] 孙冠华, 耿璇, 姜长飞, 石露, 张金涛, 江巍. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬硐库围岩破坏区解析模型及演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 359-372.
[2] 黄浚鸣, 赵向阳, 马洪岭, 王磊, 张佳敏. 盐穴压缩空气储能耦合沉渣储热的综合利用可行性分析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 373-382.
[3] 张国华, 相月, 张世殊, 王薪锦, 郭辉, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能硐库运行全过程围岩弹塑性变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 383-401.
[4] 葛鑫博, 黄俊, 赵同彬, 陶刚, 马洪岭, 王威. 人工智能在压缩空气储能地下工程中的应用综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 413-425.
[5] 曹校勇, 刘瑞辉, 李建斐, 叶欣欣, 耿珺洋, 谭海星. 中硬岩地层人工地下储气硐室衬砌结构密封体系及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[6] 孙冠华, 王章星, 王娇, 董沂鑫, 石露, 刘治军, 林姗. 基于FDEM的地下内衬硐库密封结构-衬砌分缝协同优化设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 497-514.
[7] 程昊德, 贾宁, 刘顺, 聂会建, 梁昊. 压缩空气储能人工硐库多层密封结构热传递算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 470-484.
[8] 张国华, 郭辉, 张世殊, 周芝仪, 相月, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能地下储气库椭圆形断面最佳轴比及运行压力区间确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 515-529.
[9] 刘顺, 程昊德, 贾宁, 王洪播, 尹宏磊. 压缩空气储能隧道式地下内衬硐库的伯努利管温控方案研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 539-548.
[10] 胡港, 芮瑞, 江强强, 王永平, 张文涛. 压缩空气储能隧道式硬岩储气硐起裂角与起裂压力二维数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 549-561.
[11] 谢传金, 罗红梅, 白冰, 李继岩, 杨横涛, 郑文召. 含水层压缩空气储能空间封闭性评价:理论与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 562-570.
[12] 徐杰, 张振光, 李海祥. 考虑空间土拱效应的非饱和地层圆形基坑围护结构侧向土压力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 245-254.
[13] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[14] 江沂键, 李焕焕, 朱大勇, 凌道盛, . 考虑推力线位置的边坡线性规划模型与极限平衡上下限解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1745-1754.
[15] 孙冠华, 王娇, 于显杨, 易琪, 朱开源, 王章星, 耿璇, 屈杰, . 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬硐库基本原理与分析方法研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 1-25.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!