岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 1262-1272.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0351CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0351

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

套筒辅助水下真空预压法模型试验研究

周游1, 2, 3,郭伟1, 2, 3,任宇晓1, 2, 3,闫澍旺1, 2, 3,郎瑞卿4   

  1. 1.天津大学 水利工程智能建设与运维全国重点实验室,天津 300072;2.天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300072; 3.天津大学 滨海土木工程结构与安全教育部重点实验室,天津 300350;4.天津城建大学 天津市软土特性与工程环境重点实验室,天津 300384
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-07 接受日期:2025-08-18 出版日期:2026-04-13 发布日期:2026-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 任宇晓,男,1991年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事海洋岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail: renyx66@163.com
  • 作者简介:周游,男,1996年生,博士,主要从事海洋软土地基处理方面的研究。E-mail: zhouyou03@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52108335,No.51878446,No.52171273,No.42277133)

Experiment study on sleeve-assisted underwater vacuum preloading method

ZHOU You1, 2, 3, GUO Wei1, 2, 3, REN Yu-xiao1, 2, 3, YAN Shu-wang1, 2, 3, LANG Rui-qing4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Intelligent Construction and Operation, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety of the Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 4. Key Laboratory of Soft Soil Engineering Character and Engineering Environment of Tianjin, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China
  • Received:2025-04-07 Accepted:2025-08-18 Online:2026-04-13 Published:2026-04-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52108335, 51878446, 52171273, 42277133).

摘要: 水下真空预压技术长期以来因海洋环境中真空压力难以稳定施加,被限制了其在深水环境中的应用。为解决这一瓶颈问题,提出了一种新水下真空预压方法,通过在海洋软黏土中锚固大直径套筒,作为真空泵的无水作业系统,从而有效克服了真空泵在海洋环境中压力损失的问题,实现了深水环境下的高效应用。通过4个模型试验,对比研究了不同覆水深度下新水下真空预压方法和传统无上覆水真空预压法在加固水下软黏土时的固结效果。结果显示,新水下真空预压法固结效果显著,且随上覆水深的增大加固效果显著提升。上覆水深度为7.2、4.6、1.4 m的试验T1、T2、T3相较上覆水深为0 m的对照组试验T4的土体平均含水率减少量分别提高了43.8%、31.3%和12.5%,土体平均不排水抗剪强度分别提高了39.5%、25.7%和8.7%。根据改进Asaoka法,T1、T2、T3、T4试验在40 d后的固结度分别为90.2%、90.2%、92.7%和95.3%。该研究为水下真空预压技术在深水区域的应用提供了有效途径,具有重要的工程应用前景。

关键词: 水下真空预压, 固结, 地基加固, 海洋软黏土

Abstract: The application of underwater vacuum preloading technology has long been limited by difficulties in stabilizing vacuum pressure in marine environments, which restricts its effectiveness in deep-water conditions. To address this bottleneck, this paper proposes a novel underwater vacuum preloading method, which utilizes a large-diameter sleeve anchored in marine clay as the waterless operation system of the vacuum pump, thereby overcoming vacuum-pump pressure loss in the marine environment. Four model experiments compare the consolidation performance of the new underwater vacuum preloading method at different overlying-water depths with a traditional vacuum preloading method that has no overlying water, using underwater soft clay as the test material. Results show that the new method achieves significant consolidation, and the reinforcement effect increases with greater overlying water depth. Compared to the control test T4 with an overlying water depth of 0 m, the reductions in average water content for tests T1, T2, and T3 with overlying water depths of 7.2 m, 4.6 m, and 1.4 m were 43.8%, 31.3%, and 12.5% greater, respectively. The average undrained shear strength of the soil of tests T1, T2, and T3 increased by 39.5%, 25.7%, and 8.7%, respectively, compared to test T4. According to the improved Asaoka’s method, the consolidation degrees of tests T1, T2, T3, and T4 after 40 days were 90.2%, 90.2%, 92.7%, and 95.3%, respectively. This study provides an effective approach for applying underwater vacuum preloading technology in deep-water regions, presenting significant prospects for engineering applications.

Key words: underwater vacuum preloading, consolidation, ground improvement, marine clay

中图分类号: TU 42
[1] 马凡, 马文国, 董旭光, 张刚, 赖欲儒, 周波. 基于下负荷面剑桥模型的统一状态参数模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1288-1300.
[2] 张京, 宗梦繁, 吴文兵, 张驿, 梅国雄. 自由应变下多级堆载预压联合电渗-真空排水径向固结特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1340-1350.
[3] 刘国冲, 田浩, 樊恒辉, 孙增春, 孟敏强, 任冠洲, . 基于热力学原理的饱和黏土热−力耦合本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 967-979.
[4] 周亚东, 吴松林, 邢蓓琪, 李玉龙. 真空预压-加热联合作用下竖井地基大变形固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 571-580.
[5] 鲍树峰, 董志良, 莫海鸿, 张劲文, 于立婷, 刘攀, 刘晓强, 侯明勋, . 浮泥−流泥静态间歇沉降与低压固结沉降计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2763-2772.
[6] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[7] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[8] 周波翰, 张文利, 王栋. 球形贯入仪预测超固结土强度的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[9] 金磊, 李晶晶, 李新明, 孙翰卿, . 柔性边界的有限差分法−离散元法模拟及其对砂土三轴固结排水和不排水剪切特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 980-990.
[10] 徐斌, 陈柯好, 庞锐, . 超固结黏土的剪胀方程及边界面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 449-456.
[11] FARHAD Jamil, 曾长女, 马媛, SHARAFAT Ali. 初始固结角度对饱和粉质土应变发展的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 527-538.
[12] 杨楠, 邓亚虹, 刘雪娅, 慕焕东. 黄土蠕变变形特征及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3797-3810.
[13] 代仲海, 李裕成, 莫品强, 位鑫宇, 蔡国军. 基于静力触探数据的滨海黏土应力历史与强度特性解译研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3913-3923.
[14] 詹润涛, 尹晓萌, . 利用时空变化的孔隙水压力测量数据识别固结模型参数[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3315-3328.
[15] 孙宏磊, 徐振恺, 刘斯杰, 蔡袁强, . 考虑土柱发展过程的淤泥真空预压大应变固结计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 133-146.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!