岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 1847-1864.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0828CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0828

• 压缩空气储能地下工程专题 •    下一篇

压气储能地下内衬储气库的开裂与屈服特性研究

张国华1, 2,徐宇2,任兴伟3,张世殊4,纪文栋5,华东杰1   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学(武汉)深层地热富集机制与高效开发全国重点实验室 新能源学院,湖北 武汉 430074; 2. 中国地质大学(武汉)先进技术研究院,湖北 武汉 430074;3. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074; 4. 中国电建集团成都勘测设计研究院有限公司,四川 成都 610072;5. 中能建数字科技集团有限公司,北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-31 接受日期:2026-02-03 出版日期:2026-06-11 发布日期:2026-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 华东杰,男,1995年生,博士,博士后,主要从事地下工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: huadongjie@cug.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张国华,男,1980年生,博士,教授,主要从事地下工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: zhangguohua@cug.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.U24A20599,No.52409145)

Cracking and yielding characteristics of underground lined storage reservoirs for compressed air energy storage

ZHANG Guo-hua1, 2, XU Yu2, REN Xing-wei3, ZHANG Shi-shu4, JI Wen-dong5, HUA Dong-jie1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Deep Geothermal Resources, School of Sustainable Energy, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 2. Advanced Technology Research Institute, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 3. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 4. Power China Chengdu Engineering Corporation Limited, Chengdu, Sichuan 610072, China; 5. China Energy Digital Technology Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2025-07-31 Accepted:2026-02-03 Online:2026-06-11 Published:2026-06-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U24A20599, 52409145).

摘要: 压缩空气储能(compressed air energy storage,简称CAES)地下内衬储气库承受膨胀内压作用,衬砌易开裂、围岩易屈服,但针对内衬储气库开裂与屈服特性的研究仍相对不足。基于多层厚壁圆筒理论,考虑钢衬−混凝土−钢筋−围岩的分层与等效,将开裂混凝土简化为正交各向异性层、围岩采用摩尔−库仑屈服与非关联流动法则,推导了弹性−脆性开裂−塑性屈服阶段的应力与位移解析解。进一步,结合改进的董哲仁裂缝计算方法,以衬砌外壁径向位移数值解替代传统蜕壳近似解,实现衬砌最大裂缝宽度与围岩塑性区半径的同步预测。其次,分析了储气库半径、储气内压、钢衬厚度、混凝土强度等级与厚度等因素对衬砌开裂与围岩屈服特性的影响。最后,深入探讨了衬砌的开裂特性与围岩的屈服特性。结果表明:在设定的典型工程参数范围内,储气内压、岩体质量等级和地应力是影响衬砌裂缝宽度的主要因素,地应力是影响开裂与屈服范围的主要因素;衬砌在内压超过一定界限后会迅速裂穿,而开裂与屈服范围主要在0~10 m之间且随储气内压增加逐渐增大。相关研究成果可为地下内衬储气库结构开裂与屈服特性分析提供理论支撑。

关键词: 压缩空气储能, 地下内衬储气库, 正交异性, 衬砌开裂, 围岩屈服

Abstract: Underground lined gas storage reservoirs for compressed air energy storage (CAES) are subjected to expanding internal pressure, which often results in cracking in the lining and yielding in the surrounding rock. However, research on the cracking and yielding characteristics of lined reservoirs remains relatively insufficient. Drawing upon the multi-layer thick-walled cylinder theory and considering the stratification and equivalence of steel lining, concrete, steel reinforcement, and surrounding rock, this study simplifies cracked concrete as an orthotropic layer and models the surrounding rock using the Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion and non-associated flow rule. Analytical solutions for stress and displacement during the stages of elastic deformation, brittle cracking, and plastic yielding are derived accordingly. Furthermore, by integrating the improved Dong Zheren crack calculation method, the numerical solution for the radial displacement of the lining’s outer wall is employed to replace the traditional shell approximation, facilitating the simultaneous prediction of the maximum crack width in the lining and the radius of the plastic zone in the surrounding rock. Additionally, this study analyzes the influence of factors such as storage reservoir radius, internal pressure, steel lining thickness, concrete strength grade, and thickness on the cracking behavior of the lining and the yielding characteristics of the surrounding rock. Finally, an in-depth discussion is conducted on the cracking behavior of the lining and the yielding characteristics of the surrounding rock. Results indicate that within the typical engineering parameter range defined in this study, the internal pressure of the storage reservoir, the quality grade of the surrounding rock, and the in-situ stress are the primary factors affecting the cracking width of the lining, while the in-situ stress is the main factor influencing the cracking and yielding ranges. The lining rapidly cracks and fails when internal pressure exceeds a certain threshold. The cracking and yielding ranges primarily occur between 0 and 10 meters and gradually increase with rising gas storage pressure. The findings provide theoretical support for analyzing the cracking and yielding characteristics of underground lined storage reservoir structures.

Key words: compressed air energy storage, underground lined storage reservoir, orthotropic, lining cracking, rock mass yielding

中图分类号: TU45
[1] 戴洪军, 杨雪, 蔡升华, 蒋中明, 刘益平, 张勇. 压缩空气储能储气库密封钢板厚度选择方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 1895-1905.
[2] 卢巧荣, 李奇龙, 毛新莹, 周佳庆, 陈益峰. 压缩空气储能人工硐室衬砌结构优化设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 1878-1894.
[3] 谢传金, 罗红梅, 白冰, 李继岩, 杨横涛, 郑文召. 含水层压缩空气储能空间封闭性评价:理论与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 562-570.
[4] 胡港, 芮瑞, 江强强, 王永平, 张文涛. 压缩空气储能隧道式硬岩储气硐起裂角与起裂压力二维数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 549-561.
[5] 刘顺, 程昊德, 贾宁, 王洪播, 尹宏磊. 压缩空气储能隧道式地下内衬硐库的伯努利管温控方案研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 539-548.
[6] 曹校勇, 关少钰, 叶欣欣. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬储气洞室群上覆岩体稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 530-538.
[7] 张国华, 郭辉, 张世殊, 周芝仪, 相月, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能地下储气库椭圆形断面最佳轴比及运行压力区间确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 515-529.
[8] 孙冠华, 王章星, 王娇, 董沂鑫, 石露, 刘治军, 林姗. 基于FDEM的地下内衬硐库密封结构-衬砌分缝协同优化设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 497-514.
[9] 程昊德, 贾宁, 刘顺, 聂会建, 梁昊. 压缩空气储能人工硐库多层密封结构热传递算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 470-484.
[10] 曹校勇, 刘瑞辉, 李建斐, 叶欣欣, 耿珺洋, 谭海星. 中硬岩地层人工地下储气硐室衬砌结构密封体系及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[11] 葛鑫博, 黄俊, 赵同彬, 陶刚, 马洪岭, 王威. 人工智能在压缩空气储能地下工程中的应用综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 413-425.
[12] 张国华, 相月, 张世殊, 王薪锦, 郭辉, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能硐库运行全过程围岩弹塑性变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 383-401.
[13] 黄浚鸣, 赵向阳, 马洪岭, 王磊, 张佳敏. 盐穴压缩空气储能耦合沉渣储热的综合利用可行性分析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 373-382.
[14] 孙冠华, 耿璇, 姜长飞, 石露, 张金涛, 江巍. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬硐库围岩破坏区解析模型及演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 359-372.
[15] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!