岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 1878-1894.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0827CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0827

• 压缩空气储能地下工程专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

压缩空气储能人工硐室衬砌结构优化设计研究

卢巧荣1, 2,李奇龙1, 2,毛新莹3,周佳庆1, 2,陈益峰1, 2   

  1. 1. 武汉大学 水资源工程与调度全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072;2. 武汉大学 水工岩石力学教育部重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072; 3. 中国电力工程顾问集团中南电力设计院有限公司,湖北 武汉 430060
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-31 接受日期:2026-02-03 出版日期:2026-06-11 发布日期:2026-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 周佳庆,男,1991年生,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事水工岩土渗流及其耦合方面的研究工作。E-mail: jqzhou@whu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:卢巧荣,女,1997年生,博士研究生,主要从事水工智能算法及压缩空气储能力学特性研究工作。E-mail: qiaoronglu@whu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省自然科学基金(No.2025AFA098, No.2022CFA028);国家自然科学基金(No.51988101)

Optimal design of lining structure in artificial cavern of compressed air energy storage

LU Qiao-rong1, 2, LI Qi-long1, 2, MAO Xin-ying3, ZHOU Jia-qing1, 2, CHEN Yi-feng1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 3. Central Southern China Electric Power Design Institute Corporation Limited of China Power Engineering, Wuhan, Hubei 430060, China
  • Received:2025-07-31 Accepted:2026-02-03 Online:2026-06-11 Published:2026-06-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2025AFA098, 2022CFA028) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51988101).

摘要: 压缩空气储能是提升可再生能源消纳与电网调峰能力的关键技术之一,人工硐室储气库因其选址局限性小和工程质量可控性好等优势而具有较大应用前景。然而,在高压运行状态下,储气库衬砌承受较大的拉应力,当超过材料临界强度时易发生拉伸破坏,为应对这一问题,通常需要增加衬砌配筋率或减小硐室尺寸、减小储气压力,这不仅增加建设成本,也限制了储气能力。针对以上问题,本研究提出了一种将衬砌设置在密封层内侧的衬砌−密封层−找平−初支−围岩的优化结构,并基于热力耦合模型进行了数值模拟与分析。结果表明:在温度方面,优化结构下由于衬砌保护作用,密封层温度显著低于传统结构,以钢板为密封材料时最高温度降低了46.08%;在应力方面,衬砌结构整体呈环向受拉、径向受压的状态,结构优化后钢板、混凝土衬砌和围岩最大拉应力分别降低了16.00%、28.19%和24.73%,且荷载分担研究表明两种形式下均由围岩承担大部分压力(>70%);在变形方面,最大位移均出现在衬砌顶部,优化结构的整体变形幅度相对较小。进一步分析了高、中、低3种地应力水平下的衬砌结构力学响应,相较于传统结构,优化结构在高、中、低3种地应力水平下的钢板最大第一主应力分别减小了40.26%、32.01%和22.46%,说明优化结构可以有效降低密封层环向拉应力。此外,围岩等级和围岩变形模量对储气库结构的力学响应影响显著,建议储气库在选址时选择III类及以上围岩等级。最后,对比分析了不同材料密封层的受力特征,钢板和玻璃钢作为密封材料时,整体呈环向受拉、径向受压的状态;柔性混凝土和橡胶作为密封材料时,整体呈受压状态。针对传统和优化两种结构,分别推荐钢板和柔性混凝土作为密封材料,此时围岩应力和变形相对最小。综上所述,对于人工硐室储气库,本研究提出的优化结构相较于传统结构更有利于结构稳定,研究成果对压缩空气储能人工硐室衬砌结构设计具有重要参考意义。

关键词: 压缩空气储能, 人工硐室, 衬砌结构, 衬砌?围岩联合承载, 优化设计

Abstract: Compressed air energy storage (CAES) is a key technology for the consumption of renewable energy and peak shaving of power grid. Artificial cavern gas storage has promising application prospects because it is less constrained by site selection and offers better controllability of construction quality. However, the lining and surrounding rock are subjected to significant tensile stress during high-pressure operation. When the maximum tensile stress exceeds the material’s critical strength, tensile failure occurs. To address this issue, the reinforcement ratio of the lining must usually be increased, or the chamber size and storage pressure must be reduced. However, these measures increase construction costs and limit storage capacity. In this study, an optimized structure is proposed in which the lining is placed inside the sealing layer. From the inside outward, the structure consists of the lining, sealing layer, leveling layer, initial support, and surrounding rock. Numerical simulations and analyses are conducted based on a thermo-mechanical coupling model. The results show that the sealing layer temperature in the optimized structure is significantly lower than that in the traditional structure because of the protective effect of the lining. When using steel plate as the sealing material, the maximum temperature is reduced by 46.08%. In terms of stress, the entire lining structure is subjected to circumferential tension and radial compression. After structural optimization, the maximum tensile stresses in the sealing layer, concrete lining, and surrounding rock are reduced by 16.00%, 28.19%, and 24.73%, respectively. Furthermore, the load-sharing results show that more than 70% of the pressure is borne by the surrounding rock in both structures. In terms of deformation, the maximum displacement occurs at the top of the lining. The overall displacement variation of the optimized structure is relatively small. Further analysis examines the lining structure’s mechanical response under high, medium, and low in situ stress levels. Compared with the traditional structure, the optimized structure reduces the sealing layer’s maximum first principal stress by 40.26%, 32.01%, and 22.46% under high, medium, and low in situ stress levels, respectively. This reduction demonstrates the optimized structure’s effectiveness in mitigating circumferential tensile stress in the sealing layer. Surrounding rock grade and deformation modulus significantly influence the structure’s mechanical response. For gas storage sites, surrounding rock of Grade III or higher is selected. Moreover, the mechanical properties of four kinds of sealing layer materials are compared. The steel plate and fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP) are subjected to circumferential tension and radial compression, whereas flexible concrete and rubber are in compression. Steel plate is recommended for traditional structure, whereas flexible concrete is recommended as the sealing material for optimized structure, because it minimizes stress and deformation in the surrounding rock. In summary, for artificial cavern gas storage, the optimized structure proposed in this study is more conducive to structural stability than the traditional structure. The findings provide valuable guidance for the design of artificial cavern lining structures in compressed air energy storage applications.

Key words: compressed air energy storage, artificial cavern, lining structure, combined bearing of lining and surrounding rock, design optimization

中图分类号: TU457
[1] 戴洪军, 杨雪, 蔡升华, 蒋中明, 刘益平, 张勇. 压缩空气储能储气库密封钢板厚度选择方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 1895-1905.
[2] 张国华, 徐宇, 任兴伟, 张世殊, 纪文栋, 华东杰. 压气储能地下内衬储气库的开裂与屈服特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 1847-1864.
[3] 李得建, 杜雨芮, 郭泓君, 张迎宾, 余鹏程, 陈强. 边坡加固技术及策略智能化演进:从传统迈向智能自匹配[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1728-1749.
[4] 谢传金, 罗红梅, 白冰, 李继岩, 杨横涛, 郑文召. 含水层压缩空气储能空间封闭性评价:理论与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 562-570.
[5] 胡港, 芮瑞, 江强强, 王永平, 张文涛. 压缩空气储能隧道式硬岩储气硐起裂角与起裂压力二维数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 549-561.
[6] 刘顺, 程昊德, 贾宁, 王洪播, 尹宏磊. 压缩空气储能隧道式地下内衬硐库的伯努利管温控方案研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 539-548.
[7] 曹校勇, 关少钰, 叶欣欣. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬储气洞室群上覆岩体稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 530-538.
[8] 张国华, 郭辉, 张世殊, 周芝仪, 相月, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能地下储气库椭圆形断面最佳轴比及运行压力区间确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 515-529.
[9] 孙冠华, 王章星, 王娇, 董沂鑫, 石露, 刘治军, 林姗. 基于FDEM的地下内衬硐库密封结构-衬砌分缝协同优化设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 497-514.
[10] 程昊德, 贾宁, 刘顺, 聂会建, 梁昊. 压缩空气储能人工硐库多层密封结构热传递算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 470-484.
[11] 曹校勇, 刘瑞辉, 李建斐, 叶欣欣, 耿珺洋, 谭海星. 中硬岩地层人工地下储气硐室衬砌结构密封体系及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[12] 葛鑫博, 黄俊, 赵同彬, 陶刚, 马洪岭, 王威. 人工智能在压缩空气储能地下工程中的应用综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 413-425.
[13] 张国华, 相月, 张世殊, 王薪锦, 郭辉, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能硐库运行全过程围岩弹塑性变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 383-401.
[14] 黄浚鸣, 赵向阳, 马洪岭, 王磊, 张佳敏. 盐穴压缩空气储能耦合沉渣储热的综合利用可行性分析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 373-382.
[15] 孙冠华, 耿璇, 姜长飞, 石露, 张金涛, 江巍. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬硐库围岩破坏区解析模型及演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 359-372.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!