岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 1895-1905.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0736CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0736

• 压缩空气储能地下工程专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

压缩空气储能储气库密封钢板厚度选择方法探讨

戴洪军1,杨雪2,蔡升华1,蒋中明2,刘益平1,张勇1   

  1. 1. 中国能源建设集团江苏省电力设计院有限公司,江苏 南京 211100;2. 长沙理工大学 水利与海洋工程学院,湖南 长沙 410114
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-14 接受日期:2026-04-15 出版日期:2026-06-11 发布日期:2026-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 蒋中明,男,1969年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程和能源地下存储方面的研究与开发工作。E-mail: zzmmjiang@163.com
  • 作者简介:戴洪军,男,1970年生,博士,正高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程勘察及设计、能源地下存储方面的研究与开发工作。 E-mail: daihongjun@jspdi.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国电力工程顾问集团有限公司重大科技专项(No.DG3-G01-2023);国家自然科学基金(No.52178381)。

Investigation on thickness selection method of sealing steel plate for CAES gas storage caverns

DAI Hong-jun1, YANG Xue2, CAI Sheng-hua1, JIANG Zhong-ming2, LIU Yi-ping1, ZHANG Yong1   

  1. 1. Jiangsu Power Design Institute Co., Ltd. of China Energy Engineering Group, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211100, China; 2. School of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, China
  • Received:2025-07-14 Accepted:2026-04-15 Online:2026-06-11 Published:2026-06-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the China Power Engineering Consulting Group Corporation Major Scientific and Technological Projects (DG3-G01-2023) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52178381).

摘要: 钢板作为压缩空气储能(compressed air energy storage,简称CAES)人工硐室储气库密封层的选择方案之一,其厚度设计至关重要。采用数值模拟法对密封钢板在洞径尺寸、围岩模量和储气内压等因素影响下的受力特性进行全面深入分析,进而拟合出钢板厚度与上述因素之间的关系。此外,采用理论分析法对外水压力作用下钢板屈曲临界厚度和运行环境条件下钢板的腐蚀厚度进行了分析。最后综合密封钢板的受力变形与屈曲特征以及腐蚀速率等影响因素,提出了密封钢板厚度的确定方法。研究成果表明:拟合得到的储气内压−钢板厚度间的经验公式推求临界压力或临界厚度时的误差较小,应力控制计算得到的误差仅为2.37%,应变控制计算得到的误差仅为2.35%;不设加劲环钢板的临界厚度随着外压的增加呈现非线性增加趋势,设置加劲环钢板的临界厚度随着外压的增加呈现线性增加趋势;在高温高湿环境下,钢板表面会出现全面不均匀腐蚀现象,局部锈蚀严重,在钢衬厚度设计时增加相应的腐蚀富裕厚度。最后提出的钢衬临界厚度确定方法在本研究条件范围内具有较好的适用性,可为钢板密封方案设计提供有益借鉴。

关键词: 压缩空气储能, 人工硐室, 钢衬, 钢板厚度

Abstract: The design of steel plate thickness holds substantial significance in the context of the sealing layer design for compressed air energy storage (CAES) artificial caverns. To ascertain the relationship between the steel plate thickness and factors such as the cavern diameter, surrounding rock modulus, and internal gas storage pressure, a numerical simulation method was used to analyze the stress characteristics of the steel plate under the influence of these aforementioned factors. Furthermore, a theoretical analysis method was adopted to examine the critical buckling thickness of the steel plate under external water pressure and the corrosion thickness of the steel plate under the operating environmental conditions of the CAES artificial caverns. Ultimately, considering the influencing factors such as stress deformation, buckling characteristics, and corrosion rate of the sealing steel plate, a method for determining the thickness of the sealing steel plate was proposed. The research results show that the fitted empirical formula, which establishes the relationship between gas storage pressure and steel plate thickness, exhibits minimal error when calculating critical pressure or critical thickness. Specifically, the error calculated by stress control is a mere 2.37%, while that calculated by strain control is only 2.35%. The critical thickness of steel plate without stiffening ring presents a nonlinear increasing trend as external pressure rises, whereas the critical thickness of steel plate with stiffening ring exhibits a linear increasing trend with the augmentation of external pressure. In the environment characterized by high temperature and high humidity, the surface of steel plate undergoes overall uneven corrosion, with severe localized corrosion. Consequently, the thickness of steel lining should be increased accordingly. Finally, the method proposed in this paper for determining the critical thickness of the steel lining demonstrates favorable applicability under the research conditions delineated herein, thereby offering valuable insights for the design of steel plate sealing strategies.

Key words: compressed air energy storage, artificial caverns, steel liner, steel plate thickness

中图分类号: TU57
[1] 卢巧荣, 李奇龙, 毛新莹, 周佳庆, 陈益峰. 压缩空气储能人工硐室衬砌结构优化设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 1878-1894.
[2] 张国华, 徐宇, 任兴伟, 张世殊, 纪文栋, 华东杰. 压气储能地下内衬储气库的开裂与屈服特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 1847-1864.
[3] 谢传金, 罗红梅, 白冰, 李继岩, 杨横涛, 郑文召. 含水层压缩空气储能空间封闭性评价:理论与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 562-570.
[4] 胡港, 芮瑞, 江强强, 王永平, 张文涛. 压缩空气储能隧道式硬岩储气硐起裂角与起裂压力二维数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 549-561.
[5] 刘顺, 程昊德, 贾宁, 王洪播, 尹宏磊. 压缩空气储能隧道式地下内衬硐库的伯努利管温控方案研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 539-548.
[6] 曹校勇, 关少钰, 叶欣欣. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬储气洞室群上覆岩体稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 530-538.
[7] 张国华, 郭辉, 张世殊, 周芝仪, 相月, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能地下储气库椭圆形断面最佳轴比及运行压力区间确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 515-529.
[8] 孙冠华, 王章星, 王娇, 董沂鑫, 石露, 刘治军, 林姗. 基于FDEM的地下内衬硐库密封结构-衬砌分缝协同优化设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 497-514.
[9] 程昊德, 贾宁, 刘顺, 聂会建, 梁昊. 压缩空气储能人工硐库多层密封结构热传递算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 470-484.
[10] 曹校勇, 刘瑞辉, 李建斐, 叶欣欣, 耿珺洋, 谭海星. 中硬岩地层人工地下储气硐室衬砌结构密封体系及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[11] 葛鑫博, 黄俊, 赵同彬, 陶刚, 马洪岭, 王威. 人工智能在压缩空气储能地下工程中的应用综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 413-425.
[12] 张国华, 相月, 张世殊, 王薪锦, 郭辉, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能硐库运行全过程围岩弹塑性变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 383-401.
[13] 黄浚鸣, 赵向阳, 马洪岭, 王磊, 张佳敏. 盐穴压缩空气储能耦合沉渣储热的综合利用可行性分析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 373-382.
[14] 孙冠华, 耿璇, 姜长飞, 石露, 张金涛, 江巍. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬硐库围岩破坏区解析模型及演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 359-372.
[15] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!