岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 1906-1916.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0559CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0559

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于拉压表观黏度的饱和砂土液化流动特性和物态判别研究

姚肖飞1, 2,陈育民1, 2, 3,陈润泽3,王志华4,冯义5   

  1. 1. 河海大学 精细爆破全国重点实验室,江苏 南京 210024;2. 河海大学 土木与交通学院,江苏 南京 210024;3. 苏州科技大学 土木工程学院,江苏 苏州 215011;4. 南京工业大学 城市地下空间研究中心,江苏 南京 210009;5. 中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司,陕西 西安 710043
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-29 接受日期:2025-07-25 出版日期:2026-06-11 发布日期:2026-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 陈育民,男,1981年生,博士,教授,主要从事土动力学与土工抗震方面的研究工作。E-mail: ymch@hhu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:姚肖飞,男,1996年生,博士研究生,主要从事土动力学方面的研究。E-mail: 220204030002@hhu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52179101,No.51879090);江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目(No.KYCX24_0848)。

Evaluation of liquefaction flow characteristics and soil state of saturated sand based on tension and compression apparent viscosity

YAO Xiao-fei1, 2, CHEN Yu-min1, 2, 3, CHEN Run-ze3, WANG Zhi-hua4, FENG Yi5   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Precision Blasting, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210024, China; 2. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210024, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215011, China; 4. Research Center of Urban Underground Space, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China; 5. China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Xi’an, Shaanxi 710043, China
  • Received:2025-05-29 Accepted:2025-07-25 Online:2026-06-11 Published:2026-06-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52179101, 51879090) and the Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX24_0848).

摘要: 针对南海钙质砂、福建标准砂和南京细砂开展了一系列不排水循环三轴试验,提出了拉压表观黏度ηct的概念,研究了不同影响因素下饱和砂土的液化流动特性和物态演变机制。主要结论如下:(1)考虑到饱和砂土在加载过程中的剪应力−剪应变率滞回曲线在拉伸和压缩阶段是非对称的,提出了考虑两阶段流动性差异的拉压表观黏度的概念来评价土体的液化流动特性。(2)归一化的拉压表观黏度比ηct / ηo为第1个振次的ηct 值)与超静孔压比ru的关系基本不受相对密实度Dr、加载频率f、固结围压 σ'c和循环应力比CSR的影响,且首次发现了归一化的黏度比ηct / η和双幅剪应变γDA的唯一性发展模式不受砂土种类、土体初始状态及加载条件的影响。(3)流动性差异参数λ、拉压表观黏度梯度Δηct / ηct均随着ru的增加先增大后减小,两者峰值点对应的孔压基本是一致的,可以视作土体的初始液化点,提出了将砂土的液化过程划分为固体、固液和流体的物态判别方法。

关键词: 拉压表观黏度, 液化流动特性, 物态, 孔压比, 双幅剪应变

Abstract:

A series of undrained cyclic triaxial tests were conducted on calcareous sand from the South China Sea, Fujian silica sand, and Nanjing fine sand. The liquefaction flow characteristics and evolution mechanism of soil state of saturated sand under different influencing factors were studied based on the proposed tension and compression apparent viscosity ηct  . The main conclusions are summarized as follows: (1) Considering that the hysteresis loop of shear stress-strain rate of saturated sand during cyclic loading is asymmetric during the extension and compression stages, a definition of ηct / ηo that accounts for the disparity in fluidity during these two stages is proposed to assess the liquefaction flow characteristics of sand. (2) The relationship between normalized apparent viscosity ratio (ηct / η, where ηo is the ηct -value of the first cycle) and the excess pore ratio (ru) is found to be independent of relative density (Dr), loading frequency (f), cyclic stress ratio (CSR) and consolidation confining pressure ( σ'c). It is initially identified that the unique development mode between ηct / ηand double-amplitude shear strain (γDA) remains unaffected by variations in sand type, the initial soil state, and loading conditions. (3) Both flowability difference parameter λ and the tension and compression apparent viscosity gradient Δηct / ηct  initially increase and subsequently decrease as ru increases, and the ru corresponding to the peak value of these two are essentially identical, and can be regarded as the initial liquefaction point of soil. A method is proposed for distinguishing the physical states of sandy soil during liquefaction into solid, solid-liquid, and fluid stages.

Key words: tension and compression apparent viscosity, liquefaction flow characteristic, soil state, pore pressure ratio, double amplitude shear strain

中图分类号: TU441
[1] 宋林辉, 张静轩, 郭易龙, 杨天娇, 李志明, 梅国雄. 裂隙岩层中的地铁车站基底孔压实测与分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1364-1372.
[2] 张峰, 陈国兴, 吴琪, 周正龙. 波浪荷载下饱和粉土不排水动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2695-2702.
[3] 许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 杜修力, 陈苏, 韩俊艳, . 液化自由场地震响应大型振动台模型试验分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3767-3777.
[4] 刘家顺,张向东,孙嘉宝,杨建军,方天健. 主应力轴旋转下K0固结饱和粉质黏土孔压及变形特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2787-2794.
[5] 周恩全, 朱晓冬, 陆建飞, 王炳辉, . 液化后砂土流体特性测试装置的研发及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4698-4706.
[6] 杨继红 ,董金玉 ,黄志全 ,马述江 ,耿运生,. 夯扩挤密碎石桩加固液化砂土地基的动力数值分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 593-599.
[7] 何剑平 陈卫忠. 地下结构碎石排水层抗液化措施数值试验[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3177-3184.
[8] 王淑云,鲁晓兵,赵 京,王爱兰. 粉质黏土周期荷载后的不排水强度衰化特性[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2991-2995.
[9] 张 嘎 ,张建民 ,吴 伟 . 考虑物态变化的粗粒土亚塑性本构模型[J]. , 2008, 29(6): 1530-1534.
[10] 李宏儒,胡再强,陈存礼,谢定义. 基于物态本构模型的路基动力反应分析[J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 1069-1074.
[11] 邵生俊,谢定义. 砂土的物态本构模型[J]. , 2002, 23(6): 667-972.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!