岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 2189-2200.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0548CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0548

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

花岗岩残积土双向循环直剪试验及离散元法模拟

陈一鹏1,金亦飞2,刘飞禹2, 3,杨阳1   

  1. 1. 上海核工程研究设计院有限公司,上海 200233;2. 上海大学 力学与工程科学学院,上海 200444; 3. 华东交通大学 土木建筑学院,江西 南昌330013
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-26 接受日期:2025-08-18 出版日期:2026-06-11 发布日期:2026-06-08
  • 通讯作者: 刘飞禹,男,1976年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地基处理和土动力学方面的研究。E-mail: lfyzju@shu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈一鹏,男,1975年生,学士,高级工程师,主要从事核电厂结构研究设计方面的工作。E-mail: chenyipeng@snerdi.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52378355)。

Bidirectional cyclic direct shear tests and discrete element method simulations of granite residual soil

CHEN Yi-peng1, JIN Yi-fei2, LIU Fei-yu2, 3, YANG Yang1   

  1. 1. Shanghai Nuclear Engineering Research & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200233, China; 2. School of Mechanics and Engineering Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China
  • Received:2025-05-26 Accepted:2025-08-18 Online:2026-06-11 Published:2026-06-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52378355).

摘要: 在我国东南沿海地区,花岗岩残积土常被用作路基填料,其动力特性值得深入研究。交通荷载是具有多方向性的动荷载,而土体在交通荷载等多向循环荷载作用下的动力特性显著区别于单向循环荷载下的动力特性。采用双向循环大型直剪仪,在不同频率(0.02、0.05、0.1、0.15、0.2 Hz)的法向应力下对花岗岩残积土开展了一系列法向循环荷载作用下水平循环直剪试验,并基于离散元法(discrete element method,简称DEM)对花岗岩残积土的双向循环试验进行了模拟。研究结果表明:当法向应力频率从0.02 Hz增加至0.2 Hz时,花岗岩残积土的动剪切强度减小了15.29%,竖向位移增加了21.00%,能量耗散能力增大了25.71%。法向应力频率的增大导致颗粒集合体最大力链数量减少了6.14%,总力学配位数和细接触力学配位数分别增大了0.64%和0.81%,法向应力频率主要影响细颗粒的接触特性,进而导致总的接触特性发生变化。随着法向应力频率的增加,滑移能、滚动滑移能与冲击能分别增加了69.35%、50.52%和92.79%。

关键词: 循环荷载, 法向应力频率, 花岗岩残积土, 循环剪切特性, 离散元法

Abstract: In the southeastern coastal regions of China, granite residual soil (GRS) is widely used as subgrade fill, and its dynamic characteristics merit thorough investigation. Vehicle loads and seismic actions are inherently multidirectional, and the dynamic behavior of soils under such multidirectional cyclic loading differs significantly from that under unidirectional cyclic loading. To explore these effects, a series of horizontal cyclic direct shear tests under normal cyclic loading was conducted on GRS using a large-scale bidirectional cyclic direct shear apparatus. The tests were performed under different normal stress frequencies (0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2 Hz), and discrete element method (DEM) simulations were carried out to reproduce and further interpret the bidirectional cyclic behavior of GRS. The results indicate that as the frequency of cyclic normal stress increases from 0.02 Hz to 0.2 Hz, the dynamic shear strength of GRS decreases by 15.29%, the vertical displacement increases by 21.00%, and the energy dissipation capacity improves by 25.71%. An increase in normal stress frequency results in a 6.14% reduction in the maximum number of strong force chains within the particle assembly. Meanwhile, the total and fine contact mechanical coordination numbers increase by 0.64% and 0.81%, respectively. The normal stress frequency primarily influences the contact behavior of fine particles, thereby altering the overall contact characteristics of the soil. Additionally, sliding dissipation, rolling-sliding dissipation, and dashpot dissipation increase by 69.35%, 50.52%, and 92.79%, respectively, with increasing normal stress frequency.

Key words: cyclic loading, normal stress frequency, granite residual soil, cyclic shear characteristic, discrete element method

中图分类号: TU449
[1] 蒋明镜, 杨越群, 王思远. 深海能源砂土直剪试验下力学特征与应变局部化离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1431-1442.
[2] 张昕, 张茹梦, 刘晨, 刘思宇, 郭博文. 循环荷载作用下螺旋锚桩动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1147-1159.
[3] 伍玲玲, 胡苏诚, 黄梅钟, 胡林, 田亚坤, 郑槐淼, 喻清, 韦昌富, 张志军. 微生物矿化处理铀尾砂强度非均质性分析:试验与模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 717-730.
[4] 林沛元, 刘彤, 杨翔云, 丁庆峰, 袁勋. 土钉-花岗岩残积土界面抗剪强度水弱化累积效应试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 229-244.
[5] 孙闯, 蒲云波, 敖云鹤, 陶琦, . 冻融饱水裂隙砂岩力学特性及细观破裂演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2339-2352.
[6] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[7] 高品红, 高晨博, 彭成威, 刘飞禹, . 降雨作用下花岗岩残积土边坡模型试验及离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1632-1642.
[8] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[9] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[10] 姚嘉楠, 徐长节, 迟民良, 王艳萍, 习跃来, 王伟锋, 冯国辉, 孙佳政, . RBT模式下刚性挡墙非极限主动土压力的离散元模拟及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 640-652.
[11] 吴鹏, 陈健, 付晓东, 黄珏皓, . 循环荷载作用下干燥与饱和泥质粉砂岩变形特性及其能量演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 195-207.
[12] 王立安, 余云燕, 任新, 陈辉, . 循环荷载作用下分数阶饱和黏土地基的动力固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2279-2289.
[13] 高鲁超, 戴国亮, 张继生, 万志辉, 姚中原, 王洋, . 软黏土大直径单桩水平循环加载离心机模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2411-2420.
[14] 金磊, 叶阳, 王宇, 李晶晶, . 抗转动对散粒介质三轴剪切力学行为的影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3779-3790.
[15] 骆祚森, 朱作祥, 苏卿, 李建林, 邓华锋, 杨超, . 基于平行黏结模型的水-岩作用下砂岩蠕变模拟及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2445-2457.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!