岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 23-31.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2359

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

南沙珊瑚砂的动剪切模量和阻尼比特性试验研究

梁珂1,何杨1,陈国兴1, 2   

  1. 1. 南京工业大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 210009;2. 南京工业大学 江苏省土木工程防震技术研究中心,江苏 南京 210009
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-29 修回日期:2019-04-28 出版日期:2020-01-13 发布日期:2020-01-05
  • 通讯作者: 陈国兴,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土动力学与岩土地震工程研究。E-mail: gxc6307@163.com E-mail:liangk91@163.com
  • 作者简介:梁珂,男,1991年生,博士研究生,主要从事珊瑚砂动力特性方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51678299);国家重点研发计划项目(No.2017YFC1500403);江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(No.KYCX18_1057)。

Experimental study of dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio characteristics of coral sand from Nansha Islands

LIANG Ke1, HE Yang1, CHEN Guo-xing1, 2   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Tech. University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China; 2. Civil Engineering and Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Tech. University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China
  • Received:2018-12-29 Revised:2019-04-28 Online:2020-01-13 Published:2020-01-05
  • About author:First author: LIANG Ke, male, (1991-), PhD candidate, Research interest: dynamic properties of coral sand. E-mail: liangk91@163.com Corresponding author: CHEN Guo-xing, male, (1963-), PhD, Professor, Research interest: soil dynamics and geotechnical earthquake engineering, E-mail: gxc6307@163.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678299), the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC1500403) and the Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX18_1057).

摘要: 珊瑚砂的物理力学性质与陆相沉积物有显著的差异。对南沙岛礁饱和珊瑚砂进行了不排水应变控制分级循环加载动三轴试验,研究了有效围压 和相对密实度Dr对饱和珊瑚砂动剪切模量和阻尼比特性的影响。通过与陆源砂砾土试验结果的对比发现:珊瑚砂与陆源砂砾土在最大动剪切模量Gmax、动剪切模量比G/Gmax曲线及其上下界、参考剪应变 、阻尼比? 曲线及其上下界等均存在显著的差异;珊瑚砂的Gmax比陆源砂的大,采用陆源砂Gmax的经验模型,珊瑚砂的Gmax将被低估约30%;珊瑚砂的非线性稍弱于陆源砂砾土,陆源砂砾土G/Gmax和? 的经验公式不适用于珊瑚砂。给出了珊瑚砂G/Gmax和? 的经验公式及相关参数。

关键词: 南沙珊瑚砂, 最大动剪切模量, 动剪切模量比, 阻尼比, 动三轴试验

Abstract: The physical and engineering mechanical behaviors between coral sand and terrigenous sandy soils are considerably different. To study these behaviours, a series of undrained multistage strain-controlled cyclic triaxial tests was conducted on saturated coral sand from Nansha Islands, South China Sea. The influence of effective confining pressure and relative density Dr on the dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of coral sand was studied. Compared with the test results of coral sand and terrigenous sandy soil and gravel, significant differences were found in the maximum shear modulus Gmax, the shapes and the upper and lower boundaries of shear modulus ratio G/Gmax curves, reference shear strains , the shapes and the upper and lower boundaries of damping ratio ? curves. The maximum shear modulus Gmax of coral sand is higher than that of terrigenous sandy soil and gravel, and the Gmax of coral sand predicted by empirical equations of terrigenous sandy soil is underestimated by 30%. The nonlinearity of coral sand is slightly weaker than that of terrigenous sandy soil and gravel. The empirical formulas for predicting G/Gmax and ? of terrigenous sandy soil and gravel are not applicable for Nansha coral sand. The empirical formulas for predicting G/Gmax and ? of coral sand are proposed.

Key words: Nansha coral sand, the maximum shear modulus, shear modulus ratio, damping ratio, cyclic triaxial test

中图分类号: TU 411.8
[1] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[2] 王梦洁, 张莎莎, 杨晓华, 张超, 晏长根, . 循环荷载作用下漫灌区粉质黏土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1215-1227.
[3] 王滢, 刘嘉怡, 高盟, 孔祥霄, . 地震作用下深海含气能源土动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 457-466.
[4] 刘璐, 李帅学, 张鑫磊, 高洪梅, 王志华, 肖杨. 微生物加固珊瑚砂动剪切模量与阻尼比特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3410-3420.
[5] 张大伟, 李昊泽, 刘飞禹, 冯忞, . 双向循环荷载作用下胶−砂粒径比对橡胶砂剪切特性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 239-247.
[6] 肖思奇, 黄科锋, 周红波, . 基于动三轴试验的软黏土软化系数的分析与预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 133-146.
[7] 王丽艳, 蒋飞, 庄海洋, 王炳辉, 张雷, 李明, . 考虑水化期影响的橡胶−钢渣填料动力特性与微观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 53-62.
[8] 张杰, 聂如松, 黄茂桐, 谭永长, 李亚峰, . 道砟嵌入路基土三轴试验及离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1720-1730.
[9] 黄锋, 米吉龙, 杨永浩, 董广法, 张班, 刘星辰, . 分级动荷载下土石混合体滞回曲线形态特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 674-684.
[10] 周恩全, 白宇航, 姚缘, 王龙, 陆建飞, . 橡胶混合黏土小应变剪切模量特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 705-713.
[11] 陈国兴, 韩勇, 梁珂, . 徐州城区黏性土与粉土的动剪切模量与阻尼比特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 163-172.
[12] 王盛年, 苏俊, 郭双枫, 谷雷雷, 陈泽玮, 赵凯, . 地聚物稳定粗粒填料静动力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 350-364.
[13] 杨奇, 王晓雅, 聂如松, 陈琛, 陈缘正, 徐方, . 间歇循环荷载作用下饱和砂土累积塑性变形及孔压特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1671-1683.
[14] 李雪, 王滢, 高盟, 陈青生, 彭晓东, . 地震荷载作用下南海非饱和钙质砂动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 821-833.
[15] 李丽华, 张东方, 肖衡林, 王翠英, 邓永锋. 加筋稻壳灰改性土动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3360-3369.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!