岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 11-22.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2277

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土 一维弹黏塑性固结分析

刘忠玉,夏洋洋,张家超,朱新牧   

  1. 郑州大学 土木工程学院,河南 郑州 450001
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-17 修回日期:2019-04-28 出版日期:2020-01-13 发布日期:2020-01-05
  • 作者简介:刘忠玉,男,1968年生,博士,教授,主要从事土力学与基础工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51578511)

One-dimensional elastic visco-plastic consolidation analysis of saturated clay considering Hansbo’s flow

LIU Zhong-yu, XIA Yang-yang, ZHANG Jia-chao, ZHU Xin-mu   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China
  • Received:2018-12-17 Revised:2019-04-28 Online:2020-01-13 Published:2020-01-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51578511).

摘要: 为进一步深入探讨饱和黏土的固结机制,引入考虑时间效应的统一硬化(UH)本构模型描述饱和黏土变形的弹黏塑性,以及Hansbo渗流方程描述固结过程中的非Darcy渗流,修正了饱和黏土一维固结方程,并利用有限差分法进行了求解。通过与文献中一维流变固结试验结果和理论计算结果的对比,验证了所提计算方法和UH模型的适用性。然后探讨了Hansbo渗流参数及UH模型参数对流变固结过程的影响。计算结果表明:土体的黏滞效应是引起流变固结初期地基不排水面附近出现孔压升高现象的主要原因,而渗流的非Darcy特性增强了这一效应,同时土体的这两个特性还延缓了固结中后期饱和黏土地基中孔压的整体消散和地基的沉降。另外,随着回弹指数和超固结参数的增大,或渗透指数的减小,上述流变固结特性更加明显。但是Hansbo渗流参数和渗透指数对地基最终沉降量均无影响。

关键词: 土力学, 饱和黏土, 流变固结, Hansbo渗流, 弹黏塑性, 有限差分法, 孔隙水压力, 地基沉降

Abstract: To further investigate the consolidation mechanism of saturated clay, the unified-hardening (UH) constitutive model considering the time effect was introduced to describe the elastic visco-plasticity of saturated clay soil as well as the Hansbo’s equation to describe the non-Darcy flow in the consolidation process. Accordingly, Terzaghi’s one-dimensional consolidation equation of saturated clay was modified, and the numerical analysis was conducted by using the finite difference method. In order to verify the applicability of the present method and the UH model, the numerical solutions provided by the present method for the cases that the flow of pore water obeys Darcy’s law were compared with the theoretical and experimental results based on one-dimensional rheological consolidation theory in the literature. Then the effects of Hansbo’s flow parameters and the UH model parameters on the rheological consolidation process were investigated. The calculation results show that the viscous effect of soil leads to an increase of pore water pressure near the impervious boundary at the early stage of consolidation, and the behaviour of the non-Darcy flow enhances this phenomenon. These two characteristics of soil also control the overall dissipation rate of excess pore water in the saturated clay layer, thereby reduce the settlement rates of the soil layer during the middle and late stage of consolidation. In addition, these aforementioned consolidation behaviours become more obvious with the increase of swelling index and overconsolidation parameter of soil. But the parameters of Hansbo’s flow and the permeability index have no effect on the ultimate settlement of the soil layer.

Key words: soil mechanics, saturated clay, rheological consolidation, Hansbo’s flow, elastic visco-plasticity, finite difference method, pore water pressure, ground settlement

中图分类号: TU 433
[1] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[2] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[3] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[4] 常仕奇, 董晓强, 刘晓凤, 李江山, 刘晓勇, 张豪儒, 黄寅豪, . 水位变动引发干法赤泥堆场坝体失稳的模型试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1122-1130.
[5] 王彪, 陈星欣, 尹清锋, 郭力群, 何明高, . 软土地层盾构地中对接法孔压扰动规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 535-549.
[6] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[7] 王立安, 余云燕, 任新, 陈辉, . 循环荷载作用下分数阶饱和黏土地基的动力固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2279-2289.
[8] 谢森林, 胡安峰, 肖志荣, 汪美慧, 胡训健, 陈俞超, . 基于广义Voigt模型的半渗透边界隧道周围饱和软土固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2024-2036.
[9] 金丹丹, 鲁先东, 王炳辉, 施展, 张雷, . 冲击荷载下含夹层饱和砂土孔压变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1081-1091.
[10] 李文博, 甘晓露, 刘念武, 吴昊, 谌珊珊. 基于短梁−弹簧模型的盾构隧道施工期上浮变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3755-3767.
[11] 潘鹏志, 王兆丰, 封雨捷, 李雨芯, . 深空探测任务中岩土力学若干问题及研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3153-3172.
[12] 陈成, 吴勋, 孙中华, 张先伟, 王勇, 张军杰, 余颂, . 基于弹黏塑性模型的部分排水柱孔扩张分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3259-3270.
[13] 朱建民, 郑建国, 于永堂, 蔡晶, 夏辉, . 新型电控式钻孔剪切仪的研制及测试验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 687-697.
[14] 李尧, 李嘉评. 复杂初始应力状态下松砂多向循环单剪特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2555-2565.
[15] 王晓磊, 刘理腾, 刘润, 刘历波, 董林, 任海. 地震历史对各深度土体抗液化性影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2657-2666.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!