岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 667-675.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0050

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于改进Terzarghi方法的桩网地基桩土应力计算

黄宇华1,徐林荣1, 2,周俊杰1,蔡雨1   

  1. 1. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075;2. 中南大学 高速铁路建造技术国家工程实验室,湖南 长沙 410075
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-09 修回日期:2019-06-06 出版日期:2020-02-11 发布日期:2020-02-12
  • 通讯作者: 徐林荣,男,1964年生,博士,教授,主要从事地基基础方面的教学、科研工作。E-mail: lrxu@csu.edu.cn E-mail: huangyuhua@csu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:黄宇华,男,1994年生,硕士研究生,主要从事特殊地基处理方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51778634)

Calculation of pile-soil stress in pile-net composite foundation based on improved Terzarghi method

HUANG Yu-hua1, XU Lin-rong1, 2, ZHOU Jun-jie1, CAI Yu1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 2. National Engineering Laboratory for High Speed Railway Construction, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China
  • Received:2019-01-09 Revised:2019-06-06 Online:2020-02-11 Published:2020-02-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778634).

摘要: 桩土应力比是桩网复合地基承载力和沉降计算的重要参数,其与地基的固结沉降相关,具有明显的时变特性。已有基于Terzarghi土拱模型的松动土压力计算理论是在滑动面土体均达到极限状态的假定上讨论的,不适用于桩网地基小变形条件下桩土应力的计算。为此,在Terzarghi模型的基础上,相对位移面摩阻力传递函数采用等刚度理想弹塑性模型,结合土体单元的平衡方程与变形协调方程,导出了桩土应力及土拱高度理论解,系统分析了桩土应力及拉膜效应随各设计参数的定量变化规律。分析结果表明,改进方法与现有土拱效应模型相比适用性较好,随着桩土差异沉降增加,土拱高度和桩土应力比逐渐增大,土拱率呈双曲线形减小,同时拉膜效应逐渐发挥。增加填筑荷载对土拱效应有显著削弱作用,桩土应力比随桩距增大而减小,随黏聚力增大而增大。结合改进方法与已有现场实测数据,分析了桩土应力的时变特性,验证了该方法的合理性,可为桩网地基桩土应力计算提供参考。

关键词: 桩网复合地基, 桩土应力比, 土拱效应, 拉膜效应, 时变特性

Abstract: The pile-soil stress ratio is an important parameter for calculating the bearing capacity and settlement of the pile-net composite foundation, which is related to the consolidation settlement of the foundation and has obvious time-varying characteristics. The calculation theory of loosening earth pressure based on Terzarghi soil arch model is discussed on the assumption that the soil of sliding surface reaches limit state, and it is not suitable for the calculation of pile-soil stress under the condition of small deformation of pile-net foundation. Therefore, on the basis of Terzarghi model, the equivalent stiffness ideal elastic-plastic model is adopted for the transfer function of relative displacement surface, and the theoretical solutions of pile-soil stress and soil arch height are derived by combining the equilibrium equation of soil element with the deformation coordination equation. The quantitative variation of pile-soil stress and the membrane effect with each design parameter is analyzed systematically. The results show that the improved method is more applicable than the existing arching algorithm model. With the increase of pile-soil differential settlement, the arching height and pile-soil stress ratio gradually increased, and the arching ratio decreased in hyperbolic shape, while the membrane effect works gradually. The arching effect is significantly weakened by increasing the filling load, and the pile-soil stress ratio decreases with the increase of pile spacing and increases with the increase of cohesive force. Based on the improved method and the field measured data, the time-varying characteristics of pile-soil stress are analyzed, and the rationality of the method is verified. The method proposed can be used as a reference for the calculation of pile-soil stress on the pile-netted foundation.

Key words: pile-net composite foundation, pile-soil stress ratio, soil arching effect, membrane effect, time-varying characteristics

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 芮瑞, LIN A H, 杨俊超, 杨硕, . 被动活动门试验中的土拱效应演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1657-1666.
[2] 孙珊珊, 贾世文, 梁忠旭, 刘墨林, 张常光. 基于填土荷载传递二项式分布模式的沟埋式涵洞竖向土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1501-1510.
[3] 王洪涛, 刘容利, 赵晓东, 赵耀辉, 赵万里, . 钢管桩-灌注桩复合支护下桩间土拱力学效应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1228-1239.
[4] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[5] 姚嘉楠, 徐长节, 迟民良, 王艳萍, 习跃来, 王伟锋, 冯国辉, 孙佳政, . RBT模式下刚性挡墙非极限主动土压力的离散元模拟及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 640-652.
[6] 陕耀, 董雅丞, 张旭辉, 姚西平, . 双层地下连续墙土压力的现场实测研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 507-516.
[7] 王家全, 陈家明, 林志南, 唐毅, . 基于三角形滑移面的地基松动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 697-707.
[8] 钟卫, 张 帅, 贺拿. 基于相对变形方法的桩后土拱模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 315-326.
[9] 戴天毅, 肖世国, . 考虑路堤−加固区相互作用的刚性桩复合 地基沉降算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 479-489.
[10] 邓友生, 李令涛, 彭程谱, 李龙, 刘俊聪, 付云博. 静动荷载下桩网结构路基模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2149-2156.
[11] 黎春林. 盾构开挖面三维曲面体破坏模型 及支护力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2092-2102.
[12] 张恒志, 徐长节, 何寨兵, 黄展军, 何小辉, . 基于离散元方法的不同挡墙变位模式下有 限土体主动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 257-267.
[13] 牛婷婷, 孙广超, . 高速铁路X形桩桩网复合地基动态响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1266-1280.
[14] 朱晟, 张远, 加力别克·阿哈力别克, 喻建清, 何兆升, . 基于增量分析的堆石坝瞬变-流变参数联合反演[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1453-1461.
[15] 崔蓬勃, 朱永全, 刘勇, 朱正国, 潘英东, . 非饱和砂土隧道土拱效应模型试验 及颗粒流数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3451-3466.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!