岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 886-894.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0483

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

循环荷载下竖向土拱演化规律试验研究

毕宗琦1,宫全美1,周顺华1,程茜1, 2   

  1. 1. 同济大学 道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室,上海 201804;2. 远洋控股集团有限公司,上海 200335
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-10 修回日期:2019-07-29 出版日期:2020-03-11 发布日期:2020-05-25
  • 通讯作者: 宫全美,女,1967年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程、线路工程系统动力学、轨道交通结构设计理论与施工技术等方面的研究。E-mail: gongqm@tongji.edu.cn E-mail:bizongqi@tongji.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:毕宗琦,男,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事铁路路基工程、动力安定性分析方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.41472247);国家留学基金资助(No.201806260145)。

Experimental study of the evolution law of vertical soil arch under cyclic loading

BI Zong-qi1, GONG Quan-mei1, ZHOU Shun-hua1, CHENG Qian1, 2   

  1. 1. The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804; 2. Sino-Ocean Group Holding Limited, Shanghai 200335
  • Received:2019-03-10 Revised:2019-07-29 Online:2020-03-11 Published:2020-05-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41472247) and China Scholarship Council(201806260145).

摘要: 土拱效应广泛存在于结构?土相互作用体系中,并不可避免地受到动荷载的影响。为探究循环荷载下土拱的演化过程,开展了循环加载下的活动门试验,结合粒子图像测速法(PIV),对土拱的结构形态、位移场及竖向应力的变化规律进行了分析。结果表明,初始土拱形成时活动门上方产生三角形脱空区,施加循环荷载后该结构边界逐渐沿竖向延伸并向填土表面发展,位移场影响范围呈扇形向两侧扩大。根据初始差异沉降的不同,土拱的发展演化呈现出最终状态的差异:达到新的稳定状态,或发生失稳破坏。循环荷载下,初始活动门位移较大时土拱更易趋于破坏,表现为脱空区贯通填土表面并形成竖向滑裂面。土拱结构的稳定性受到脱空区土体堆积对其下边界的支撑作用影响。

关键词: 土拱, 活动门试验, 循环荷载, 粒子图像测速法, 稳定性

Abstract: Arching effect is a common phenomenon in the systems of soil-structure interaction, and has been found to be inevitably affected by dynamic loading. The present study is devoted to investigate the evolution process of soil arch under the cyclic loading. To this end, a series of tests was conducted by using a trapdoor apparatus equipped with a cyclic loading system. By using particle image velocimetry (PIV) together with a set of dynamic load cells, evolution behaviors of the soil arch are observed and analyzed, including the geometric features, particle displacement fields and variation of vertical stresses. Based on the test results, it is found that the settlement of moving gates generates a void area over the trapdoor with a triangular boundary as the soil arch is initially formed. After applying cyclic loads, the structural boundary of the void area gradually extends vertically and moves upward to the filling surface, while the displacement region spreads in a fan-shaped patterns and extends to the sides with increasing base angles. Depending on the differences of initial trapdoor displacements and cyclic loads, two typical categories of the final stability of soil arch under cyclic loading are identified in the tests, namely the new stable cases and collapse cases. The results show that soil arch with a larger initial trapdoor displacement is more likely to experience a final collapse, as the void area extends along the filling height and a vertical slip surface is generated. The stability of soil arch under is related to the supporting effect of the accumulated soil within the void area to the lower boundary of the soil arch.

Key words: soil arch, trapdoor test, cyclic loading, particle image velocimetry, stability

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[2] 冯德銮, 余洋, 梁仕华. 碱激发地聚物固化滨海软土的强度和水稳定性研究进展与评述[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 13-39.
[3] 徐全, 侯靖, 杨剑, 杨昕光, 倪绍虎, 陈鑫. 基于合成岩体技术的岩质边坡稳定性精细化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2062-2070.
[4] 芮瑞, LIN A H, 杨俊超, 杨硕, . 被动活动门试验中的土拱效应演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1657-1666.
[5] 孙珊珊, 贾世文, 梁忠旭, 刘墨林, 张常光. 基于填土荷载传递二项式分布模式的沟埋式涵洞竖向土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1501-1510.
[6] 李邵军, 张世殊, 李永红, 柳秀洋, 李治国, 徐鼎平, 程丽娟, 江权, 汤大明, 陈刚, . 双江口水电站极高应力大型地下厂房硬岩破坏机制与稳定性控制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1581-1594.
[7] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[8] 刘祥宁, 张文杰, . 酸性干湿循环下铬污染土固化体浸出行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1196-1204.
[9] 王洪涛, 刘容利, 赵晓东, 赵耀辉, 赵万里, . 钢管桩-灌注桩复合支护下桩间土拱力学效应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1228-1239.
[10] 孙文超, 王君豪, 徐文杰, 董晓阳, 任禾, 王洪兵, 张学杰, 王恒威, . 基于物质点法的高速公路弃渣场稳定性及 灾害动力学分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 991-1000.
[11] 曹虎, 张广清, 李世远, 汪文瑞, 谢彭旭, 孙伟, 李帅, . 基于断裂过程区的压裂驱油水力裂缝 扩展模型及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 798-810.
[12] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[13] 姚嘉楠, 徐长节, 迟民良, 王艳萍, 习跃来, 王伟锋, 冯国辉, 孙佳政, . RBT模式下刚性挡墙非极限主动土压力的离散元模拟及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 640-652.
[14] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[15] 钱法桥, 邓亚虹, 慕焕东, 杨楠, 刘凡, 王梦晨, . 基于小波变换和拟动力法的边坡地震稳定性评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 88-96.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!