岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 905-914.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0306

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

水平和竖向地震作用下液化场地群桩基础 动力响应试验研究

张恒源,钱德玲,沈超,戴启权   

  1. 合肥工业大学 土木与水利工程学院,安徽 合肥 230009
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-30 修回日期:2019-06-05 出版日期:2020-03-11 发布日期:2020-05-25
  • 通讯作者: 钱德玲,女,1956年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail: dlqian@sina.com E-mail: hyzhanghfut@foxmail.com
  • 作者简介:张恒源,男,1993年生,硕士研究生,主要从事结构抗震和土-结构动力相互作用研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然基金资助项目(No.51378168)

Experimental investigation on dynamic response of pile group foundation on liquefiable ground subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake excitations

ZHANG Heng-yuan, QIAN De-ling, SHEN Chao, DAI Qi-quan   

  1. College of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009, China
  • Received:2019-01-30 Revised:2019-06-05 Online:2020-03-11 Published:2020-05-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China(51378168).

摘要: 为研究水平和竖向(双向)耦合地震作用下液化场地群桩基础的动力响应,设计了可液化地基?群桩基础?框筒结构动力相互作用体系振动台模型试验。选取不同类型模拟地震波作为振动台试验激励,通过对比水平地震作用和双向耦合地震作用下土体加速度、超孔隙水压力和群桩应变等试验结果,进而分析双向耦合地震作用对可液化地基和群桩基础动力响应的影响。研究结果表明:双向耦合地震作用下,液化场地土体竖向加速度峰值随土体埋深高度的减小而逐渐增大;饱和砂土的液化效应与双向耦合地震作用和输入地震波的类型有关;相比水平地震作用,不同种类波双向耦合地震作用下群桩基础桩身中部和底部的应变峰值增大,桩顶应变峰值变化略有不同;双向耦合地震作用加剧了建筑结构群桩体系的摇摆和倾斜。研究结果对可液化地基上群桩基础的抗震设计和防灾减灾具有十分重要的研究意义。

关键词: 水平和竖向地震作用, 振动台试验, 液化, 桩?土?结构动力相互作用, 动力响应

Abstract: To investigate the dynamic response of pile group foundation on liquefiable ground subjected to horizontal and vertical (bidirectional) coupling earthquake excitations, a shaking table model test for a dynamic interaction system with liquefiable ground- pile group foundation-frame tube structure was conducted. Different types of earthquake motions were selected as the excitations for the shaking table test, and then the influence of bidirectional coupling earthquake excitations on the dynamic response of liquefiable ground and pile group foundation were analyzed by comparing the test results of soil acceleration, excess pore water pressure and pile group strain subjected to horizontal unidirectional and bidirectional coupling excitations. The results indicate that under the bidirectional coupling earthquake excitations, the vertical peak acceleration of liquefiable soil gradually increases with the decrease of buried depth; the liquefaction effect of saturated sand is related to the bidirectional coupling earthquake excitations and the type of input earthquake motions; besides, compared with the horizontal earthquake excitation, the peak strain in the central and bottom of pile group foundation are larger than those under the bidirectional coupling earthquake excitations, the variation of peak strain of pile top is different; also, the swaying and tilting of the pile group system of the building structure are exacerbated by the bidirectional coupling earthquake excitations. The research results are of great significance to both the seismic design of pile group on liquefiable foundation and disaster prevention and mitigation.

Key words: horizontal and vertical earthquake excitations, shaking table test, liquefaction, pile-soil-structure dynamic interaction, dynamic response

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 范猛, 李敬军, 杨正权, 刘小生, 朱凯斌, 赵剑明, . 基于标准贯入试验的液化判别方法对深埋砂土适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[2] 可文海, 杨文海, 李源, 吴磊, . SH波作用下斜坡地形中桩基的动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[3] 周文强, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 肖卓琦, 罗義錬, 魏明, . 锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[4] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[5] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[6] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[7] 慕焕东, 邓亚虹, 赵勋昌, 何乃楠, 郑龙浩, 何也, . 基于非饱和剪切体变特征的马兰黄土液化评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3197-3207.
[8] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[9] 龙潇, 孙锐, 郑桐, . 基于卷积神经网络的液化预测模型及可解释性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[10] 马建勋, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, 庞盼望, 李文枭, 闫洪祥. 考虑土−结构相互作用的地下室层对高层建筑地震反应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[11] 许文昊, 王志华, 申志福, 高洪梅, 刘殷强, 张鑫磊, . 基于CFD-DEM方法的饱和砂土场地液化模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2492-2501.
[12] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[13] 杨洋, 魏怡童. 基于分类树的液化概率等级评估新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2175-2186.
[14] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[15] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 潘申鑫, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 地震作用下桩板墙-锚索组合支护基覆型边坡的动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!